- OpenStack-I18n - lists.openstack.org

IRC meeting today
by Ying Chun Guo 07 Jan '16

07 Jan '16

Hello, team I hope you had a good new year holiday. We will have our first IRC meeting in 2016 today, at 0600UTC in #openstack-meeting. I'm going to cover following topics: * Glossary management process discussion * Open discussions Feel free to propose other topics if you like. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)

2 1

Re: [Openstack-i18n] How do we manage glossary?
by Kato, Tomoyuki 06 Jan '16

06 Jan '16

> >> Expected workflow: > >> * add an entry to the master glossary: > >> - Update glossary/master.yaml and review it on gerrit > >> - Once approved, glossary-tool sync will update per-language glossary > >> files and propose the update to gerrit (jenkins jos) > > > > In your design, when the changes to master.yaml is approved, how to trigger > > the jenkins job ? using a tag ? > > I think we could add one more action in this Jenkins job: automatically send > > an email to i18n to notify that the glossary is changed. > > We can use 'post' pipeline to trigger some jobs when each change is merged. I'm not fully contexted, but generally agree to 'post' pipeline idea. KATO Tomoyuki

1 0

Fw: [OpenStack-docs] Travel support for Summit, April 25-29, Austin, TX
by Ying Chun Guo 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

Hi, team If you need the travel support for Austin Summit, you could apply now. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) ----- Forwarded by Ying Chun Guo/China/IBM on 2016/01/05 17:01 ----- Anne Gentle <annegentle(a)justwriteclick.com> wrote on 2016/01/05 01:43:00: > From: Anne Gentle <annegentle(a)justwriteclick.com> > To: "openstack-docs(a)lists.openstack.org" <openstack-docs(a)lists.openstack.org> > Date: 2016/01/05 01:45 > Subject: [OpenStack-docs] Travel support for Summit, April 25-29, Austin, TX > > Hi all, > Want to be sure that documentarians know about the travel support > program to get contributors to the Summit. Read all about it and apply here: > > https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/austin-and-travel/#travel-supp… > > Thanks, > Anne > > -- > Anne Gentle > Rackspace > Principal Engineer > www.justwriteclick.com_______________________________________________ > OpenStack-docs mailing list > OpenStack-docs(a)lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs

1 0

Re: [Openstack-i18n] How do we manage glossary?
by Akihiro Motoki 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

Hi Daisy and the team, 2015-12-17 19:35 GMT+09:00 Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com>: > Hi, Akihiro > > Please let me know your comments to https://review.openstack.org/258924 I commented your above review. I proposed a counter proposal https://review.openstack.org/261767. This is just an idea. I am open to the input. Comments inline below. > Answers to your question: > > 1. Context > > The current solution in my patch could not satisfy this requirement about > context. > If we want to put context to glossary, we need to develop our own extension > of sphinx-build. > How do you think the priority to support context ? IMHO supporting contexts is important to make discussion on glossary productive. As you can see in Japanese glossary on OpenStack wiki [1], I believe that discussion contexts are important for further discussions and it also helps new contributors understand the background. In my proposal https://review.openstack.org/261767, we maintain all contexts in YAML glossary files. > 2. Process > > If people want to change the glossary, e.g. add, update, change the > comments, add coments > following process is designed. > > a> the requestor submits a patch to i18n repo > b> core team approve the patch > c> the auto uploading process is triggered. terminology.pot is uploaded to > Zanata for translation > d> translators finish translation > e> Zanata admin manually patch terminology.pot and its translation po files, > and upload to Zanata IMO the glossary needs to be reviewed more carefully compared to regular translations. In regular translations, all translated strings are imported, but for glossary it is better that only reviewed strings are imported. Another choice is to use gerrit for the glossary review. My proposal https://review.openstack.org/261767 implements the latter option. Thought? Thanks, Akihiro > > Best regards > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) > > > Akihiro Motoki <amotoki(a)gmail.com> wrote on 2015/12/02 02:29:44: > >> From: Akihiro Motoki <amotoki(a)gmail.com> >> To: "openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org" >> <Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org> >> Date: 2015/12/02 02:32 >> Subject: [Openstack-i18n] How do we manage glossary? > >> >> Hi team, >> >> Recently we added the glossary to the i18n repo [1]. >> I wonder how we can manage the glossary and am sending this mail. >> The glossary can be referred to in Zanata, so it would be useful. >> >> Mainly I have two questions. >> >> The first point is what is the expected process to manage the glossary. >> How can we update the glossary? >> When is it uploaded to Zanata for translations? >> >> The second point is how we can have the context. >> I think the second point is also important. >> Each entry in our glossary has some background, for example >> why we reach the current consensus. >> This kind of context is important to discuss for further improvements. >> >> I updated the glossary for Japanese translation last week >> and I added various description about backgrounds of the glossary. >> I feel it is important to keep the context. >> How can we manage the context? >> >> I don't have a good idea now. >> I would like to raise these questions for broader discussion. >> >> Thanks, >> Akihiro >> >> [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/i18n/tree/i18n >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openstack-i18n mailing list >> Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n >> >

2 1

Re: [Openstack-i18n] Transifex
by Ian Y. Choi 23 Dec '15

23 Dec '15

Hello Daisy, Thank you so much for your kind explanation. I agree that all of translation data are successfully moved to Zanata, and I have no objection to remove current Transifex not to be confused for OpenStack translation contributor candidates. I just worried that some guys might want to see previous Transifex history: who contributed to OpenStack translations later, since, the author of translation results from Transifex to Zanata is "OpenStack Infra", not actual translators, as far as I know. However, I also think that it is very difficult to keep all the history to public. For my OpenStack translation stuff, I do not need Transifex any more. So if other translators also do not need to see to track previous translators in Transifex, then there is no more additional reason to remove Transifex except querying statistics. And one more idea: although some previous translators are not regarded as ATC, I think it would be much better to mention their Transifex ID (at least) to acknowledge their previous contribution or credit on somewhere, such as OpenStack wiki. Let's discuss on today IRC meeting :) With many thanks, /Ian Ying Chun Guo wrote on 12/17/2015 2:39 PM: > > Ian Y, > > I will not use the official i18n repo to store those materials. > I plan to store it in a personal repo in github, > just to keep the history. > > We have moved all data into Zanata while we migrated to Zanata in > September. > 4 months passed, we didn't get any complains about any missing data. > We could be sure that all data have been moved to the new tool. > So it's not that necessary to back up. > > The only reason to support to not delete OpenStack from Transifex is that: > it's easy to query the contribution data in any certain period through > the web UI of Transifex. > If we remove OpenStack from Transifex, we will lost the ability to query. > I could export the contribution data for a certain period, for > example, the last 3 years, from Transifex, > and store the export data somewhere. > But I will lost the ability to query any periods, for example, the > data from 2015.4-2015.10 will not be able to get. > > So we could discuss whether we need this ability in the meeting today. > If we don't need, Transifex is no use for us. We could delete it safely. > > Best regards > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) > > > "Ian Y. Choi" <ianyrchoi(a)gmail.com> wrote on 2015/12/17 12:21:34: > > > From: "Ian Y. Choi" <ianyrchoi(a)gmail.com> > > To: Ying Chun Guo/China/IBM@IBMCN, Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.com> > > Cc: Robert Simai <robert.simai(a)suse.com>, > openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > Date: 2015/12/17 12:22 > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Transifex > > > > Hello Andreas, > > > > I am copying & pasting from Andreas's comment to this thread: > > > > +++ > > "Sorry, let me clarify this again: > > * ATC is one year (voting rights for i18n) > > * Free passes for OpenStack conference is 6 months > > > > For ATC, you could take a one time snapshot as well now - going back > > to 1st of April, instead of saving it for later," > > > > > > => Thank you so much for your nice clarification on ATC status and > > summit free passes. > > > > We would vote this issue (removing on Transifex site) on today's IRC > > meeting, and yes. > > We need contribution statistics data from Transifex, and I agree that > > we can query and save Transifex statistics data (from April 1 2015 > > to now) and later > > we would merge this data with Zanata statistics data on next April. > > > > And I am not sure exactly, but we might use openstack/i18n repo to > > store Transfex related data > > into a specific branch, not a master branch. > > > > > > With many thanks, > > > > /Ian > > > > > > Ying Chun Guo wrote on 12/17/2015 1:21 AM: > > If we don't need the contribution data in Transifex, I think we > > could remove it. > > > > As to the back up, it's a personal habit. I just want to keep it as > > the history. > > I will use a repo in github to store the documents, including an > > Excel file with the contribution statistic data. > > > > Best regards > > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) > > > > > > -----Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.com> wrote: ----- > > > > >To: "Ian Y. Choi" <ianyrchoi(a)gmail.com>, Robert Simai > > ><robert.simai(a)suse.com> > > >From: Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.com> > > >Date: 12/16/2015 09:59PM > > >Cc: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > >Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Transifex > > > > > >On 2015-12-16 14:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > >> On 2015-12-16 14:34, Ian Y. Choi wrote: > > >>> Hello Robert, > > >>> > > >>> As far as I remember, on the last i18n irc meeting (Dec 03 2015 +6 > > >UTC), > > >>> we discussed this issue. > > >>> > > >>> During the meeting, meeting attendees found that querying to > > >Transifex > > >>> statistics data > > >>> is needed to check ATC status for the next OpenStack release, > > >Mitaka. > > >> > > >> ATC status is handed out only for people active in the current > > >release, > > >> so for the next summit in Austin, only for people that were active > > >in > > >> Mitaka time frame. And since we used Zanata for all of Mitaka, > > >there's > > >> no need to query transifex IMO. > > >> > > >> Katamo is wrong with ATC status for one year, this has changed, > > > > > >See > > >https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/45531/atc-pass-for-the-openstac > > >k-summit/ > > >with information for Tokyo summit (1st of April was cut-off-date), > > > > > >Andreas > > >-- > > > Andreas Jaeger aj(a){suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi > > > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > > > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, > > > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > > > GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 > > >A126 > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Openstack-i18n mailing list > > >Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n > > > > > > >

5 5

How do we manage glossary?
by Akihiro Motoki 17 Dec '15

17 Dec '15

Hi team, Recently we added the glossary to the i18n repo [1]. I wonder how we can manage the glossary and am sending this mail. The glossary can be referred to in Zanata, so it would be useful. Mainly I have two questions. The first point is what is the expected process to manage the glossary. How can we update the glossary? When is it uploaded to Zanata for translations? The second point is how we can have the context. I think the second point is also important. Each entry in our glossary has some background, for example why we reach the current consensus. This kind of context is important to discuss for further improvements. I updated the glossary for Japanese translation last week and I added various description about backgrounds of the glossary. I feel it is important to keep the context. How can we manage the context? I don't have a good idea now. I would like to raise these questions for broader discussion. Thanks, Akihiro [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/i18n/tree/i18n

2 1

Re: [Openstack-i18n] Transifex
by Ian Y. Choi 17 Dec '15

17 Dec '15

Hello Andreas, I am copying & pasting from Andreas's comment to this thread: +++ "Sorry, let me clarify this again: * ATC is one year (voting rights for i18n) * Free passes for OpenStack conference is 6 months For ATC, you could take a one time snapshot as well now - going back to 1st of April, instead of saving it for later," => Thank you so much for your nice clarification on ATC status and summit free passes. We would vote this issue (removing on Transifex site) on today's IRC meeting, and yes. We need contribution statistics data from Transifex, and I agree that we can query and save Transifex statistics data (from April 1 2015 to now) and later we would merge this data with Zanata statistics data on next April. And I am not sure exactly, but we might use openstack/i18n repo to store Transfex related data into a specific branch, not a master branch. With many thanks, /Ian Ying Chun Guo wrote on 12/17/2015 1:21 AM: > If we don't need the contribution data in Transifex, I think we could > remove it. > > As to the back up, it's a personal habit. I just want to keep it as > the history. > I will use a repo in github to store the documents, including an Excel > file with the contribution statistic data. > > Best regards > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) > > > -----Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.com <mailto:aj@suse.com>> wrote: ----- > > >To: "Ian Y. Choi" <ianyrchoi(a)gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi@gmail.com>>, > Robert Simai > ><robert.simai(a)suse.com <mailto:robert.simai@suse.com>> > >From: Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.com <mailto:aj@suse.com>> > >Date: 12/16/2015 09:59PM > >Cc: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > <mailto:openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org> > >Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Transifex > > > >On 2015-12-16 14:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> On 2015-12-16 14:34, Ian Y. Choi wrote: > >>> Hello Robert, > >>> > >>> As far as I remember, on the last i18n irc meeting (Dec 03 2015 +6 > >UTC), > >>> we discussed this issue. > >>> > >>> During the meeting, meeting attendees found that querying to > >Transifex > >>> statistics data > >>> is needed to check ATC status for the next OpenStack release, > >Mitaka. > >> > >> ATC status is handed out only for people active in the current > >release, > >> so for the next summit in Austin, only for people that were active > >in > >> Mitaka time frame. And since we used Zanata for all of Mitaka, > >there's > >> no need to query transifex IMO. > >> > >> Katamo is wrong with ATC status for one year, this has changed, > > > >See > >https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/45531/atc-pass-for-the-openstac > >k-summit/ > >with information for Tokyo summit (1st of April was cut-off-date), > > > >Andreas > >-- > > Andreas Jaeger aj(a){suse.com <mailto:aj@%7Bsuse.com>,opensuse.org} > Twitter: jaegerandi > > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, > > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > > GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 > >A126 > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Openstack-i18n mailing list > >Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > <mailto:Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org> > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n > > > >

2 1

IRC meeting today
by Ying Chun Guo 17 Dec '15

17 Dec '15

Hi, team We will have IRC meeting today, at 1300UTC in #openstack-meeting. I'm going to cover following topics. * Status update: Liberty installation guide translation * Discussion: Midcycle spring/virtual spring * Vote: delete OpenStack from Transifex * Open discussions Feel free to propose other topics if you like. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)

1 0

Transifex
by Ying Chun Guo 16 Dec '15

16 Dec '15

Hello, team I have handled all the team join requests to OpenStack in Transifex, sending emails to inform the tool change and then rejecting them. I noticed there was no translations happened in Transifex after Oct. I think we could start to remove Openstack projects from Transifex. We may find a place to back up firstly, and then remove. Any objections to the remove ? Any suggestions about the back up ? Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)

4 6

How to set accept language tag to Dutch (nl) in OpenStack Tempest test framework?
by durga rao 15 Dec '15

15 Dec '15

I have latest tempest downloaded from GitHub.Here is my test requirement:We have a set of test scripts for compute, storage and network. For all the REST calls made by tempest test framework, I want to set the "Accept Language" tag to Dutch [nl] (Netherlands Dutch).It might just be one configuration file change. I want to know the configuration file that needs to be changed.Quick response is appreciated.Thank you

1 0