October 2021 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[all] Dynamic Zuul results table in Gerrit 3
by Radosław Piliszek 05 Aug '22

05 Aug '22

Hello Fellow OpenStack and OpenDev Folks! TL;DR click on [3] and enjoy. I am starting this thread to not hijack the discussion happening on [1]. First of all, I would like to thank gibi (Balazs Gibizer) for hacking a way to get the place to render the table in the first place (pun intended). I have been a long-time-now user of [2]. I have improved and customised it for myself but never really got to share back the changes I made. The new Gerrit obviously broke the whole script so it was of no use to share at that particular state. However, inspired by gibi's work, I decided to finally sit down and fix it to work with Gerrit 3 and here it comes: [3]. Works well on Chrome with Tampermonkey. Not tested others. I hope you will enjoy this little helper (I do). I know the script looks super fugly but it generally boils down to a mix of styles of 3 people and Gerrit having funky UI rendering. Finally, I'd also like to thank hrw (Marcin Juszkiewicz) for linking me to the original Michel's script in 2019. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/019051… [2] https://opendev.org/x/coats/src/commit/444c95738677593dcfed0cfd9667d4c4f0d5… [3] https://gist.github.com/yoctozepto/7ea1271c299d143388b7c1b1802ee75e Kind regards, -yoctozepto

5 7

[all] PyCharm Licenses Renewed till July 2021
by Swapnil Kulkarni 13 Jul '22

13 Jul '22

Hello, Happy to inform you the open source developer license for Pycharm has been renewed for 1 additional year till July 2021. Best Regards, Swapnil Kulkarni coolsvap at gmail dot com

8 13

Nova not updating to new size of an extended in-use / attached cinder volume (Ceph RBD) to guest
by Christian Rohmann 28 Jun '22

28 Jun '22

Hello Openstack-Discuss, after some digging I found out that cinder learned to resize attached (in-use) volumes quite a while ago with the introduction of the initial "extend 'in-use' volume" feature: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/454287/ The support was then extended to also cover Ceph RBD backed volumes with: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/613039/ Since this is only about the cinder part, I was wondering if nova would ever find out and would actively rescan the device / volume and quintessentially present an increased new size to the guest. Apparently this is where a certain volume-extended event comes into play: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/454322/ that is to be emitted by cinder when a volume had been extened. I then went head and tried this with the openstack cli (as Horizon does not seem to support / offer to resize in-use volumes. I run Openstack Train with Ceph RBD as storage. First I ran into an issue with the openstack cli (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1871759/comments/2 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1871759/comments/2>) but using cinder extend $volumeid $newsize I was able to resize in-use volumes just fine. The only thing missing was the propagation to the guest. I played around with SCSI rescans, but that did not work, reboots also failed to do anyting in this regards. Stopping and starting the VM did work, but why having the capability to online-resize an attached volume when not being able to resize the guest volume as well? Apparently there seems to be an old and somewhat similar observation / bug with https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1369465 So I was simply wondering if this is expected to be working? Are there any special settings / options I need to set to enable this feature? Thanks and with kind regards Christian

4 9

[oslo] Propose to EOL stable/queens, stable/rocky on all the oslo scope
by Herve Beraud 25 Jun '22

25 Jun '22

Hi, On our last meeting of the oslo team we discussed the problem with broken stable branches (rocky and older) in oslo's projects [1]. Indeed, almost all these branches are broken. Előd Illés kindly generated a list of periodic-stable errors on Oslo's stable branches [2]. Given the lack of active maintainers on Oslo and given the current status of the CI in those branches, I propose to make them End Of Life. I will wait until the end of month for anyone who would like to maybe step up as maintainer of those branches and who would at least try to fix CI of them. If no one will volunteer for that, I'll EOLing those branches for all the projects under the oslo umbrella. Let us know your thoughts. Thank you for your attention. [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-10-04-15.00.log.t… [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-July/023939.html -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud

5 5

[ops][nova][victoria] Power State = Suspended?
by DHilsbos＠performair.com 24 Jan '22

24 Jan '22

All; I had something unusual happen this morning; one of my VMs was showing "Suspended" under the Power State in the Horizon dashboard. I've never seen that. What does it mean? Any search that I do points me to a bunch of resources for Status Suspended. Thank you, Dominic L. Hilsbos, MBA Vice President - Information Technology Perform Air International Inc. DHilsbos(a)PerformAir.com www.PerformAir.com

4 8

[nova][dev] Revisiting qemu emulation where guest arch != host arch
by Apsey, Christopher 05 Jan '22

05 Jan '22

All, A few years ago I asked a question[1] about why nova, when given a hw_architecture property from glance for an image, would not end up using the correct qemu-system-xx binary when starting the guest process on a compute node if that compute nodes architecture did not match the proposed guest architecture. As an example, if we had all x86 hosts, but wanted to run an emulated ppc guest, we should be able to do that given that at least one compute node had qemu-system-ppc already installed and libvirt was successfully reporting that as a supported architecture to nova. It seemed like a heavy lift at the time, so it was put on the back burner. I am now in a position to fund a contract developer to make this happen, so the question is: would this be a useful blueprint that would potentially be accepted? Most of the time when people want to run an emulated guest they would just nest it inside of an already running guest of the native architecture, but that severely limits observability and the task of managing any more than a handful of instances in this manner quickly becomes a tangled nightmare of networking, etc. I see real benefit in allowing this scenario to run natively so all of the tooling that exists for fleet management 'just works'. This would also be a significant differentiator for OpenStack as a whole. Thoughts? [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2018-August/015653… Chris Apsey Director | Georgia Cyber Range GEORGIA CYBER CENTER 100 Grace Hopper Lane | Augusta, Georgia | 30901 https://www.gacybercenter.org

2 2

[stable][requirements][zuul] unpinned setuptools dependency on stable
by Balazs Gibizer 16 Dec '21

16 Dec '21

Hi, The latest setuptools (58.0) removed support for "use_2to3" [1] (deprecated since 46.2). Many OpenStack modules defines decorator==3.4.0 as lower constraints[2]. However, decorator 3.4.0 cannot be installed anymore with the latest setuptool as it depends on "use_2to3". On master, this can be solved easily by bumping the dependency to decorator 4.0.0. On stable/xena we can still solve it the same way with a new RC. But on older stable branches such solution might be against the stable policy as it would require a major bump on our dependencies. This issue is not limited to lower-constraints testing it just hit us there first. A similar break could happen in our upper constraints as well on old stable branches. The root of the problem is that we always use the latest setuptools in our CI testing even on old stable branches. Zuul's ensure-tox task[4] installs tox which installs the virtualenv package which bundles the latest setuptools package. This happens without applying any constraints. Then tox is used to install the project's dependencies under lower or upper constraints with the unconstrained setuptools available. During and after yesterday's nova meeting [3] we discussed possible solutions. Option 1: Bump the major version of the decorator dependency on stable. Pros: * easy to implement Cons: * might against the policy / breaks downstream packagers * needs to be done in each affected project[3] separately * not future proof. After a future setuptools release we can see a similar break with another of our dependencies. @Stable Cores: how do you feel about such bump? Option 2: Pin the setuptools version during tox installation Pros: * single solution for all affected projects * future proof against breaks introduced by future setuptools releases Cons: * complex change as it probably requires to extend the base task in zuul itself Option 3: turn off lower-constraints testing Pros: * easy to implement * some of us want to get rid of lower constraints anyhow Cons: * needs per project changes * not future proof against similar break affecting our upper constraints on old stable branches. Option 4: utilize pyproject.toml[6] to specify build-time requirements Unfortunately, I'm not sure if it is possible to restrict the maximum setuptools version with it As a side note I tried applying [tox]requires in tox.ini to restrict setuptools version[7] but It does not seem to take effect in our case[8]. @Stable Cores: what do you think what could be the way forward? Cheers, gibi [1] https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/history.html#v58-0-2 [2] https://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=decorator%3D%3D3.4.0&i=nope&literal=nop… [3] https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.20… [4] https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/ensure-tox/tasks… [5] https://tox.readthedocs.io/en/latest/config.html#conf-requires [6] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0518/ [7] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/810293/1/tox.ini [8] https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/f78a0300c8734e7c8475309af1d2e1a4…

11 28

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary 15th Oct, 21: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 11 Dec '21

11 Dec '21

Hello Everyone, Here is this week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. TC Meetings: ============ * TC this week IRC meeting held on Oct 14th Thursday. * Most of the meeting discussions are summarized below (Completed or in-progress activities section). Meeting full logs are available @ - https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-10-14-15.00.log.html * Next week's meeting is cancelled as we are meeting in PTG. We will have the next IRC meeting on Oct 28th, Thursday 15:00 UTC, feel free the topic on agenda[1] by Oct 27th. 2. What we completed this week: ========================= * None in this week. 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for Xena cycle ------------------------------ * TC is using the etherpad[2] for Xena cycle working item. We will be checking it in PTG * Current status is: 9 completed, 3 to-be-discussed in PTG, 1 in-progress Open Reviews ----------------- * Six open reviews for ongoing activities[3]. New project 'Skyline' proposal ------------------------------------ * You might be aware of this new dashboard proposal in the previous month's discussion. * A new project 'Skyline: an OpenStack dashboard optimized by UI and UE' is now proposed in governance to be an official OpenStack project[4]. * Skyline team is planning to meet in PTG on Tue, Wed and Thu at 5UTC, please ask your queries or have feedback/discussion with the team next week. Place to maintain the external hosted ELK, E-R, O-H services ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * We had a final discussion or I will say just a status update on this which was mentioned in last week's email summary[5]. * Now onwards, discussion and migration work will be done in TACT SIG (#openstack-infra IRC channel). Add project health check tool ----------------------------------- * No updates on this, we will continue discussing it in PTG for the next steps on this and what to do with TC liaison things. * Meanwhile, we are reviewing Rico proposal on collecting stats tools [6]. Stable Core team process change --------------------------------------- * Current proposal is under review[7]. Feel free to provide early feedback if you have any. Call for 'Technical Writing' SIG Chair/Maintainers ---------------------------------------------------------- * As agreed in last week's TC meeting, we will be moving this SIG work towards TC. * TC members have been added to the core members list in the SIG repos. * We will be discussing where to move the training repos/work in PTG. TC tags analysis ------------------- * Operator feedback is asked on open infra newsletter too, and we will continue the discussion in PTG and will take the final decision based on feedback we receive, if any[9]. Complete the policy pop up team ---------------------------------------- * Policy pop team has served its purpose and we have new RBAC as one of the the community-wide goal for the Yoga cycle. * We are marking this popup team as completed[10]. Project updates ------------------- * Retiring js-openstack-lib [11] Yoga release community-wide goal ----------------------------------------- * Please add the possible candidates in this etherpad [12]. * Current status: "Secure RBAC" is selected for Yoga cycle[13]. PTG planning ---------------- * We will be meeting in PTG next week, please check the details in this etherpad [14] * Do not forget to join the TC+community leaders sessions on Monday, Oct 18 15 UTC - 17 UTC. Test support for TLS default: ---------------------------------- * Rico has started a separate email thread over testing with tls-proxy enabled[15], we encourage projects to participate in that testing and help to enable the tls-proxy in gate testing. 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[16]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15 UTC [17] 3. Office hours: The Technical Committee offers a weekly office hour every Tuesday at 0100 UTC [18] 4. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-xena-tracke [3] https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+status:open [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/814037 [5]http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/02525… [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/810037 [7] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/810721 [9] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/tags/index.html [10] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/814186 [11] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/798540 [12] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/807163 [13] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/y-series-goals [14] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-yoga-ptg [15] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-June/023000.html [16] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [17] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting [18] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Office_hours -gmann

9 25

[puppet] Propose retiring old stable branches(Stein, Rocky and Queens)
by Takashi Kajinami 26 Nov '21

26 Nov '21

Hello, In puppet repos we have plenty of stable branches still open, and the oldest is now stable/queens. However recently we haven't seen many backports proposed to stein, rocky and queens [1], so I'll propose retiring these three old branches now. Please let me know if anybody is interested in keeping any of these three. Note that currently CI jobs are broken in these three branches and it is likely we need to investigate the required additional pinning of dependent packages. If somebody is still interested in maintaining these old branches then these jobs should be fixed. [1] https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:%255Eopenstack/puppet-.*)AND(NOT+proj… Thank you, Takashi Kajinami

2 2

[all][sphinx] "rST localisation for language "foo" not found" error
by Stephen Finucane 24 Nov '21

24 Nov '21

We've seen issues in some projects, whereby attempting to build translations as part of the 'openstack-tox-docs' zuul job [1] can result in the following warning: Warning, treated as error: ../doc/source/contributor/contributing.rst::rST localisation for language "id" not found. Based on [2], this issue appears to have been introduced by a recent version bump of docutils, which was in turn introduced by the introduction of Sphinx 4.x. We don't have a resolution for this bug yet but we'll update when we do. Hopefully this email will improve the "Google'ability" of this bug. Stephen [1] https://opendev.org/openstack/openstackdocstheme/src/commit/08461c5311aa692… [2] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2021-April/120848.html

2 2