Open Stack

Don’t get it, are you talking about the Neutron FWaaS ? If so, yes it would
avoid the so called High traffic situation that I talked about on baremetal.

Docker is less subject to such issue as the workload would so be
distributed among multiple nodes thanks to LBaaS, LB Solution such as
HAProxy/Vendor solutions or even ingress technics.

I would however agree for small docker clusters but I highly doubt that
professional company would indeed choose to host such services without
having correctly forecasted enough hardware.
Le jeu. 1 févr. 2018 à 21:34, Christian Berendt <
berendt at betacloud-solutions.de> a écrit :

>
>
> > On 1. Feb 2018, at 19:42, Flint WALRUS <gael.therond at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think that indeed make sens as because now a day most the
> installations tend to either be within a dockerized solution or a
> relatively fair amont (3/4) of large hw nodes.
> >
> > One situation that would require dedicated hw would be a very large
> installation requiring you to lower the network pression on your
> controllers or docker workers in order to avoid noisy behaviors.
>
> Depending on the firewall concept, dedicated networks make sense in
> smaller environments using Docker.
>
> Christian.
>
> --
> Christian Berendt
> Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
>
> Mail: berendt at betacloud-solutions.de
> Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de
>
> Betacloud Solutions GmbH
> Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland
>
> Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt
> Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart
> Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20180201/66aa8a11/attachment.html>