Don’t get it, are you talking about the Neutron FWaaS ? If so, yes it would avoid the so called High traffic situation that I talked about on baremetal.<br><br>Docker is less subject to such issue as the workload would so be distributed among multiple nodes thanks to LBaaS, LB Solution such as HAProxy/Vendor solutions or even ingress technics.<br><br>I would however agree for small docker clusters but I highly doubt that professional company would indeed choose to host such services without having correctly forecasted enough hardware.<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le jeu. 1 févr. 2018 à 21:34, Christian Berendt <<a href="mailto:berendt@betacloud-solutions.de">berendt@betacloud-solutions.de</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
> On 1. Feb 2018, at 19:42, Flint WALRUS <<a href="mailto:gael.therond@gmail.com" target="_blank">gael.therond@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> I think that indeed make sens as because now a day most the installations tend to either be within a dockerized solution or a relatively fair amont (3/4) of large hw nodes.<br>
><br>
> One situation that would require dedicated hw would be a very large installation requiring you to lower the network pression on your controllers or docker workers in order to avoid noisy behaviors.<br>
<br>
Depending on the firewall concept, dedicated networks make sense in smaller environments using Docker.<br>
<br>
Christian.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Christian Berendt<br>
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)<br>
<br>
Mail: <a href="mailto:berendt@betacloud-solutions.de" target="_blank">berendt@betacloud-solutions.de</a><br>
Web: <a href="https://www.betacloud-solutions.de" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.betacloud-solutions.de</a><br>
<br>
Betacloud Solutions GmbH<br>
Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland<br>
<br>
Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt<br>
Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart<br>
Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>