Doug, Thanks for the resolution. It is well written and sets appropriate guidelines. I was expecting something terrible – I guess I shouldn’t have expectations ahead of a resolution. Apologies for being a jerk on the ml. Nice work. I left some commentary in the review and left a vote of -1 (just a few things need tidying, not a -1 of the concept in general). Regards -steve -----Original Message----- From: Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org> Date: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 2:54 PM To: openstack-dev <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org> Subject: [openstack-dev] [tc][kolla][stable][security][infra][all] guidelines for managing releases of binary artifacts Based on two other recent threads [1][2] and some discussions on IRC, I have written up some guidelines [3] that try to address the concerns I have with us publishing binary artifacts while still allowing the kolla team and others to move ahead with the work they are trying to do. I would appreciate feedback about whether these would complicate builds or make them impossible, as well as whether folks think they go far enough to mitigate the risks described in those email threads. Doug [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-May/116677.html [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-May/117282.html [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469265/ __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev