[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

Banashankar KV banveerad at gmail.com
Tue Sep 22 23:40:20 UTC 2015


Ok, sounds good. So now the question is how should we name the new V2
resources ?


Thanks
Banashankar


On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov> wrote:

> Yes, hence the need to support the v2 resources as seperate things. Then I
> can rewrite the templates to include the new resources rather then the old
> resources as appropriate. IE, it will be a porting effort to rewrite them.
> Then do a heat update on the stack to migrate it from lbv1 to lbv2. Since
> they are different resources, it should create the new and delete the old.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Banashankar KV [banveerad at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:16 PM
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2
>
> But I think, V2 has introduced some new components and whole association
> of the resources with each other is changed, we should be still able to do
> what Kevin has mentioned ?
>
> Thanks
> Banashankar
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> There needs to be a way to have both v1 and v2 supported in one engine....
>>
>> Say I have templates that use v1 already in existence (I do), and I want
>> to be able to heat stack update on them one at a time to v2. This will
>> replace the v1 lb with v2, migrating the floating ip from the v1 lb to the
>> v2 one. This gives a smoothish upgrade path.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kevin
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Brandon Logan [brandon.logan at RACKSPACE.COM]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 3:22 PM
>> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2
>>
>> Well I'd hate to have the V2 postfix on it because V1 will be deprecated
>> and removed, which means the V2 being there would be lame.  Is there any
>> kind of precedent set for for how to handle this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brandon
>> On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 14:49 -0700, Banashankar KV wrote:
>> > So are we thinking of making it as ?
>> > OS::Neutron::LoadBalancerV2
>> >
>> > OS::Neutron::ListenerV2
>> >
>> > OS::Neutron::PoolV2
>> >
>> > OS::Neutron::PoolMemberV2
>> >
>> > OS::Neutron::HealthMonitorV2
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > and add all those into the loadbalancer.py of heat engine ?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Banashankar
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Sergey Kraynev
>> > <skraynev at mirantis.com> wrote:
>> >         Brandon.
>> >
>> >
>> >         As I understand we v1 and v2 have differences also in list of
>> >         objects and also in relationships between them.
>> >         So I don't think that it will be easy to upgrade old resources
>> >         (unfortunately).
>> >         I'd agree with second Kevin's suggestion about implementation
>> >         new resources in this case.
>> >
>> >
>> >         I see, that a lot of guys, who wants to help  with it :) And I
>> >         suppose, that me and Rabi Mishra may try to help with it,
>> >         because we was involvement in implementation of v1 resources
>> >         in Heat.
>> >         Follow the list of v1 lbaas resources in Heat:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Neutron::LoadBalancer
>> >
>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Neutron::Pool
>> >
>> >
>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Neutron::PoolMember
>> >
>> >
>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Neutron::HealthMonitor
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >         Also, I suppose, that it may be discussed during summit
>> >         talks :)
>> >         Will add to etherpad with potential sessions.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >         Regards,
>> >         Sergey.
>> >
>> >         On 22 September 2015 at 22:27, Brandon Logan
>> >         <brandon.logan at rackspace.com> wrote:
>> >                 There is some overlap, but there was some incompatible
>> >                 differences when
>> >                 we started designing v2.  I'm sure the same issues
>> >                 will arise this time
>> >                 around so new resources sounds like the path to go.
>> >                 However, I do not
>> >                 know much about Heat and the resources so I'm speaking
>> >                 on a very
>> >                 uneducated level here.
>> >
>> >                 Thanks,
>> >                 Brandon
>> >                 On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:38 +0000, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
>> >                 > We're using the v1 resources...
>> >                 >
>> >                 > If the v2 ones are compatible and can seamlessly
>> >                 upgrade, great
>> >                 >
>> >                 > Otherwise, make new ones please.
>> >                 >
>> >                 > Thanks,
>> >                 > Kevin
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >
>>  ______________________________________________________________________
>> >                 > From: Banashankar KV [banveerad at gmail.com]
>> >                 > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:07 AM
>> >                 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
>> >                 usage questions)
>> >                 > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat
>> >                 support for
>> >                 > LbaasV2
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >                 > Hi Brandon,
>> >                 > Work in progress, but need some input on the way we
>> >                 want them, like
>> >                 > replace the existing lbaasv1 or we still need to
>> >                 support them ?
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >                 > Thanks
>> >                 > Banashankar
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >                 > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Brandon Logan
>> >                 > <brandon.logan at rackspace.com> wrote:
>> >                 >         Hi Banashankar,
>> >                 >         I think it'd be great if you got this going.
>> >                 One of those
>> >                 >         things we
>> >                 >         want to have and people ask for but has
>> >                 always gotten a lower
>> >                 >         priority
>> >                 >         due to the critical things needed.
>> >                 >
>> >                 >         Thanks,
>> >                 >         Brandon
>> >                 >         On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 17:57 -0700,
>> >                 Banashankar KV wrote:
>> >                 >         > Hi All,
>> >                 >         > I was thinking of starting the work on
>> >                 heat to support
>> >                 >         LBaasV2,  Is
>> >                 >         > there any concerns about that?
>> >                 >         >
>> >                 >         >
>> >                 >         > I don't know if it is the right time to
>> >                 bring this up :D .
>> >                 >         >
>> >                 >         > Thanks,
>> >                 >         > Banashankar (bana_k)
>> >                 >         >
>> >                 >         >
>> >                 >
>> >                 >         >
>> >                 >
>> >
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >                 >         > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
>> >                 for usage questions)
>> >                 >         > Unsubscribe:
>> >                 >
>> >
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >                 >         >
>> >                 >
>> >
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >                 >         OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
>> >                 usage questions)
>> >                 >         Unsubscribe:
>> >                 >
>> >
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >                 >
>> >
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >                 >
>> >
>>  __________________________________________________________________________
>> >                 > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> >                 questions)
>> >                 > Unsubscribe:
>> >
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >                 >
>> >
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>> >
>>  __________________________________________________________________________
>> >                 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> >                 questions)
>> >                 Unsubscribe:
>> >
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>  __________________________________________________________________________
>> >         OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >         Unsubscribe:
>> >         OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150922/40aa68c6/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list