Open Stack

Let me join the rest of the Neutron team in thanking you for the great effort leading this amazing group of contributors.

I do believe it is great to have a rotational leadership and I do encourage the next Neutron PTL to do the same.

Cheers!

Edgar

From: Kyle Mestery
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date: Friday, September 11, 2015 at 2:12 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Non-Candidacy

I'm writing to let everyone know that I do not plan to run for Neutron PTL for a fourth cycle. Being a PTL is a rewarding but difficult job, as Morgan recently put it in his non-candidacy email [1]. But it goes further than that for me. As Flavio put it in his post about "Being a PTL" [2], it's a full time job. In the case of Neutron, it's more than a full time job, it's literally an always on job.

I've tried really hard over my three cycles as PTL to build a stronger web of trust so the project can grow, and I feel that's been accomplished. We have a strong bench of future PTLs and leaders ready to go, I'm excited to watch them lead and help them in anyway I can.

As was said by Zane in a recent email [3], while Heat may have pioneered the concept of rotating PTL duties with each cycle, I'd like to highly encourage Neutron and other projects to do the same. Having a deep bench of leaders supporting each other is important for the future of all projects.

See you all in Tokyo!
Kyle

[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/074157.html
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/073986.html
[2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/074242.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150914/8cb82c6e/attachment.html>