[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Etherpad from the Ops Meetup

Ryan Moats rmoats at us.ibm.com
Wed Aug 19 21:11:55 UTC 2015


One thing came up during lunch was including unit and functional testing of
dual stack in the check and gate queues - I was regaled over lunch with one
operator's experiences in trying to run Neutron on a dual stack system.

Ryan Moats (regXboi)

Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote on 08/19/2015 03:43:44 PM:

> From: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 08/19/2015 03:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Etherpad from the Ops Meetup
>
> Actually, there were very few requirements collected. So, your
> summary is correct.
>
> I feel that this time we did not get a lot of input s we got during
> the Ops meet-up in Philadelphia.
>
> I also recommend to read the burning issues ether pads, there are
> few suggestions on the networking side. Actually, I believe
> Operators has expressed in this session some good feedback that they
> probaly did not want to repeat during the networking section.
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PAO-ops-burning-issues
>
> Cheers,
>
> Edgar
>
> From: Assaf Muller
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 1:34 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Etherpad from the Ops Meetup
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com
> > wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I just want to share with you the feedback collected today during
> the networking session on Ops Meet-up:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PAO-ops-network-model
>
> Special thanks to Ryan and Doug for helping on some questions.
>
> The only action items for Neutron developers that I can spot are:
> 1. Linux bridge + DVR / multi host
> 2. Prevent data loss when restarting the OVS agent (The patch [1] is
> very close to merge anyway, nothing more to do here)
> 3. Work as described by [2] (Big deployers team)
> The rest is either polling (Who uses what feature / plugin / etc) or
> generic comments with no actionable bugs or RFEs.
> Did I miss anything?
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182920/
> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Network_Segmentation_Usecases
>
> Cheers,
>
> Edgar
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

>
__________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150819/a52694e7/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list