Open Stack

The etherpad contains some complaints around DVR implementation that might
deserve furhter exploration.
However, as pointed out by Jay, the comments made leave very little room
for actionable items.
It would be great if the author(s) could fill in with more details.

Salvatore

On 19 August 2015 at 23:11, Ryan Moats <rmoats at us.ibm.com> wrote:

> One thing came up during lunch was including unit and functional testing
> of dual stack in the check and gate queues - I was regaled over lunch with
> one operator's experiences in trying to run Neutron on a dual stack system.
>
> Ryan Moats (regXboi)
>
> Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote on 08/19/2015 03:43:44 PM:
>
> > From: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> > <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> > Date: 08/19/2015 03:44 PM
>
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Etherpad from the Ops Meetup
> >
> > Actually, there were very few requirements collected. So, your
> > summary is correct.
> >
> > I feel that this time we did not get a lot of input s we got during
> > the Ops meet-up in Philadelphia.
> >
> > I also recommend to read the burning issues ether pads, there are
> > few suggestions on the networking side. Actually, I believe
> > Operators has expressed in this session some good feedback that they
> > probaly did not want to repeat during the networking section.
> >
> > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PAO-ops-burning-issues
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Edgar
> >
> > From: Assaf Muller
> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> > Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 1:34 PM
> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Etherpad from the Ops Meetup
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com
> > > wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I just want to share with you the feedback collected today during
> > the networking session on Ops Meet-up:
> > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PAO-ops-network-model
> >
> > Special thanks to Ryan and Doug for helping on some questions.
> >
> > The only action items for Neutron developers that I can spot are:
> > 1. Linux bridge + DVR / multi host
> > 2. Prevent data loss when restarting the OVS agent (The patch [1] is
> > very close to merge anyway, nothing more to do here)
> > 3. Work as described by [2] (Big deployers team)
> > The rest is either polling (Who uses what feature / plugin / etc) or
> > generic comments with no actionable bugs or RFEs.
> > Did I miss anything?
> >
> > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182920/
> > [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Network_Segmentation_Usecases
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Edgar
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150819/33565804/attachment.html>