<html><body><p>One thing came up during lunch was including unit and functional testing of dual stack in the check and gate queues - I was regaled over lunch with one operator's experiences in trying to run Neutron on a dual stack system.<br><br>Ryan Moats (regXboi)<br><br><tt>Edgar Magana <edgar.magana@workday.com> wrote on 08/19/2015 03:43:44 PM:<br><br>> From: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana@workday.com></tt><br><tt>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <br>> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org></tt><br><tt>> Date: 08/19/2015 03:44 PM</tt><br><tt>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Etherpad from the Ops Meetup</tt><br><tt>> <br>> Actually, there were very few requirements collected. So, your <br>> summary is correct.</tt><br><tt>> <br>> I feel that this time we did not get a lot of input s we got during <br>> the Ops meet-up in Philadelphia.</tt><br><tt>> <br>> I also recommend to read the burning issues ether pads, there are <br>> few suggestions on the networking side. Actually, I believe <br>> Operators has expressed in this session some good feedback that they<br>> probaly did not want to repeat during the networking section.</tt><br><tt>> <br>> <a href="https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PAO-ops-burning-issues">https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PAO-ops-burning-issues</a></tt><br><tt>> <br>> Cheers,</tt><br><tt>> <br>> Edgar</tt><br><tt>> <br>> From: Assaf Muller<br>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"<br>> Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 1:34 PM<br>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"<br>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Etherpad from the Ops Meetup</tt><br><tt>> <br>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana@workday.com<br>> > wrote:</tt><br><tt>> Folks,</tt><br><tt>> <br>> I just want to share with you the feedback collected today during <br>> the networking session on Ops Meet-up:</tt><br><tt>> <a href="https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PAO-ops-network-model">https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PAO-ops-network-model</a></tt><br><tt>> <br>> Special thanks to Ryan and Doug for helping on some questions.</tt><br><tt>> <br>> The only action items for Neutron developers that I can spot are:</tt><br><tt>> 1. Linux bridge + DVR / multi host</tt><br><tt>> 2. Prevent data loss when restarting the OVS agent (The patch [1] is<br>> very close to merge anyway, nothing more to do here)</tt><br><tt>> 3. Work as described by [2] (Big deployers team)</tt><br><tt>> The rest is either polling (Who uses what feature / plugin / etc) or<br>> generic comments with no actionable bugs or RFEs.</tt><br><tt>> Did I miss anything?</tt><br><tt>> <br>> [1] <a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182920/">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182920/</a></tt><br><tt>> [2] <a href="https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Network_Segmentation_Usecases">https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Network_Segmentation_Usecases</a></tt><br><tt>> <br>> Cheers,</tt><br><tt>> <br>> Edgar</tt><br><tt>> <br>> __________________________________________________________________________<br>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<br>> <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br></tt><br><tt>> __________________________________________________________________________<br>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<br>> <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br></tt><BR>
</body></html>