Open Stack

I couldn't put it better, nice write up Morgan!! +1

On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Morgan Fainberg <morgan.fainberg at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
>
> > On Aug 2, 2015, at 16:00, Daniel Comnea <comnea.dani at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From Operators point of view i'd love to see less technology
> proliferation in OpenStack, if you wear the developer hat please don't be
> selfish, take into account the others :)
> >
> > ZK is a robust technology but hey is a beast like Rabbit, there is a lot
> to massage and over 2 data centers ZK is not very efficient.
> >
>
> Sure, lets evaluate the more far reaching benefits of running the new
> service for all openstack deployments. This is not a "hey neat tech"
> debate, it is a "lets see if this tool solves enough issues that it is
> worth using an 'innovation token' on". I think it is worth it personally,
> but it should be a consistent choice with a strong reason and added value
> beyond a single one-off usecase.
>
> --morgan
>
> Sent via mobile
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150802/1f5b4451/attachment.html>