- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[election][Requirements] PTL candidacy
by Matthew Thode 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the Requirements project. The project was recently updated to allow multiple PTLs this cycle and I imagine tony will be my better half. The following will be my goals for the cycle, in order of importance: 1. The primary goal is to keep a tight rein on global-requirements and upper-constraints updates. (Keep things working well) 2. Un-cap requirements where possible. 3. Fix some automation of generate contstraints (pkg-resources being added and setuptools being dropped) 4. Audit global-requirements and upper-constraints for redundancies. One of the rules we have for new entrants to global-requirements and/or upper-constraints is that they be non-redundant. Keeping that rule in mind, audit the list of requirements for possible redundancies and if possible, reduce the number of requirements we manage. 5. introduce better python version range support into constraints. An image with all the python versions we want is likely needed. I look forward to continue working with you in this cycle, as your PTL or not. Thanks for your time, -- Matthew Thode

3 5

[election][Ironic] PTL Candidacy
by Jay Faulkner 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

Hi all, I wanted to let you know I'm running for PTL of Ironic for the Antelope cycle. You can read my candidate statement[1] for full information, but feel free to ask me any questions you'd like here if you have them. Thanks, Jay Faulkner [1] - https://governance.openstack.org/election/#antelope-ptl-candidates

1 0

[horizon] instance filtering dropdown default
by John Ratliff 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

When I load certain pages in horizon, like the compute instances page, the default filter is "Instance ID". How can I change the default to "Instance Name" instead? Thanks. --John Ratliff

1 0

Horizon
by Atharva Dhanwate 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

4 3

[neutron] Bug deputy report for week of August 29th
by Brian Haley 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

Hi, I was Neutron bug deputy last week. Below is a short summary about the reported bugs. BTW, you don't have to wait for me to be deputy to file all your bugs :) -Brian Critical bugs ------------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1988026 - Neutron should not create security group with project==None - Talked to Security Response Team and they decided to add a tracker to it since the quota system doesn't seem to limit how many random default security groups one can create. - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/855580 High bugs --------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1988037 - Neutron does not find an existing route - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/854986 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1988296 - neutron-lib pep8 CI failing with pylint==2.15.0 - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/855061 Medium bugs ----------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1988069 - neutron-dhcp-agent fails when small tenant network mtu is set - Could not reproduce issue reported with MTU as 70 for network, only saw that instances could not do DHCP with it so small. Looks like a potential kernel bug since this works on later versions. * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1988199 - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/855257 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1988220 - large unused dependency ncclient + paramiko in os-ken - Assigned to Rodolfo since he made change to remove nose https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-ken/+/850631 - closed (won't-fix) as ncclient is required for os-ken, just wasn't explicitly called-out in requirements. * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1988549 - Trunk status is down after a live-migration - Arnau Verdaguer took ownership Low bugs -------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1988298 - [neutron-lib] "registry.has_resource_extenders" is the same as "resource_extend.has_resource_extenders" - Needs owner * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1586731 - restart neutron ovs agent will leave the fanout queue behind - Old bug re-opened - Partial patch posted, asked commenter to submit to master Misc bugs --------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1988281 - neutron dhcp agent state not consistent with real status - After a restart, the agent status is UP even though it is still doing a full-sync operation, is there a way to signify this status? See bug for further discussion. * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1988382 - L3 agent(agent_mode=dvr_snat) restart, fip namespace removed rfp-port, resulting in fip not connecting - Failure is seen in code from 2019, asked submitter to try tip of stable/victoria and reproduce since there have been fixed in this area since then. Wishlist bugs ------------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1988077 - Noisy neutron-openvswitch-agent service - There are some deployments that wanted more logging which is why the agent is more verbose. Will have to have a further discussion to see if there is a way to address concern of log being noisy, besides using more aggressive log rotation as suggested. * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1988188 - Create an automated tool to retrieve the needed OVS version depending on the OVN one - Suggested by Rodolfo to help improve gate dependencies. * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1988542 - [RFE] OVN support for vnic type virtio-forwarder - Will need to add to Drivers meeting agenda

1 0

Two containers fail
by Derek O keeffe 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

Hi, I recently successfully installed OSA and I am now trying to install it again from scratch with all the configuration changes I needed in place. Unfortunately this time around it is failing on setup_hosts.yml here: TASK [lxc_container_create : Create container (dir)] ******************************************************************ok: [infra1_memcached_container-b92f4db7 -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]ok: [infra1_rabbit_mq_container-d286a482 -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]ok: [infra1_utility_container-05f756fc -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]ok: [infra1_galera_container-5beef059 -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]ok: [infra1_aodh_container-639f5ad8 -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]ok: [infra1_neutron_server_container-f67e972d -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]ok: [infra1_horizon_container-dfeaa0dc -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]ok: [infra1_placement_container-350e4ede -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]ok: [infra1_heat_api_container-82cbd764 -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]ok: [infra1_nova_api_container-b30c38d1 -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]ok: [infra1_repo_container-f16e50a9 -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]ok: [infra1_ceilometer_central_container-910a888f -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]ok: [infra1_keystone_container-32dcd68b -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]ok: [infra1_gnocchi_container-30ccb451 -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]fatal: [infra1_cinder_api_container-840a18bb -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]: FAILED! => {"changed": false, "error": "Failed to start container [ infra1_cinder_api_container-840a18bb ]", "lxc_container": {"init_pid": -1, "interfaces": [], "ips": [], "name": "infra1_cinder_api_container-840a18bb", "state": "stopped"}, "msg": "The container [ infra1_cinder_api_container-840a18bb ] failed to start. Check to lxc is available and that the container is in a functional state.", "rc": 1}fatal: [infra1_glance_container-b50e16a6 -> infra1(CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS)]: FAILED! => {"changed": false, "error": "Failed to start container [ infra1_glance_container-b50e16a6 ]", "lxc_container": {"init_pid": -1, "interfaces": [], "ips": [], "name": "infra1_glance_container-b50e16a6", "state": "stopped"}, "msg": "The container [ infra1_glance_container-b50e16a6 ] failed to start. Check to lxc is available and that the container is in a functional state.", "rc": 1} I don't understand how 14 containers are fine (can be attached to and commands run through lxc-attach) and 2 containers are failing. I have a deploy host, controller and two computes all with a fresh install of Ubuntu 20.04. The bootstrap_ansible script ran fine on the deploy host and the setup_hosts playbook ran through fully as after the above it skipped cinder and glance containers every where else. Can anybody please point me in the direction of getting more info or a possible cause. Thanks in advance.

2 2

[Octavia][release] Requesting exception for python-octaviaclient
by Gregory Thiemonge 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

Hi Folks, I am requesting a Feature Freeze Exception for the release of python-octaviaclient for Zed. One patch [0] was merged at the end of last week in python-octaviaclient (we were waiting for the related feature to get merged in the octavia repo) and a new release (3.1.0) was proposed for Zed in the release repo [1], but it wasn't merged in time. We would like to get the approval for this new release so we could base the stable/zed branch on this new tag (we would need to update [2]). Thanks, Gregory [0] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-octaviaclient/+/664473 [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855675 [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855912

2 1

[election][tripleo] PTL Candidacy for Antelope cycle
by Rabi Mishra 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

Hi All, I would like to nominate myself for Antelope cycle TripleO PTL. As some of you would know, I have been part of the OpenStack community for a long time and have been a core contributor for TripleO and Heat. I have also served as Heat PTL for Ocata cycle. James has done a great job as PTL for the last few cycles. I would like to take the opportunity to thank him for all his effort and we all would agree that he needs a well deserved break. I am looking forward to take the opportunity to help the community to achieve some of the already planned goals and in-progress workstreams like standalone roles, multi-rhel and other challenges that come along the way. Also, as before, our focus would continue to be on review prioritization, in progress work streams and collaboration on common priorities. Regards, Rabi Mishra

9 8

[nova]How to confirm whether a arm64 node supports hardware acceleration for virtual machines
by 韩光宇 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

Hello, I see `egrep -c '(vmx|svm)' /proc/cpuinfo` in nova install documentation[1]. It can be used to confirm whether a node supports hardware acceleration for virtual machines on x86 architecture. But it is not applicable in the ARM architecture. Do we have an officially recommended method to confirm in ARM architecture? Thanks, Han Guangyu [1]https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/install/compute-install-rdo.html#f…

3 2

[oslo][relmgmt][taskflow][nova] fasteners.ReaderWriterLock and oslo.concurrency's fair lock is broken if used in eventlet
by Balazs Gibizer 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

Hi, It is hard to properly figure out which OpenStack project is affected exactly. But I want to give a heads up. If the following is true for your project then you are affected: * using eventlet and * using oslo.concurrency fair internal lock (external lock or non fair locks are not affected) or using fasteners.ReaderWriterLock directly. I know that nova is affected and based on code search taskflow is affected at least. The oslo.concurrency's fair lock uses fasteners.ReaderWriterLock[1]. The fasteners.ReaderWriterLock relies on threading.current_thread to identify a thread and decide if a thread already has a lock and therefore can reenter the lock. However in an eventlet monkey patched environment, a thread that is created with eventlet.spawn_n() or the patched threading.Thread() the threading.current_thread call does not return an eventlet unique ID. This causes that the lock can be reentered from multiple eventlets at the same time. We have 4 ways forward: 0) Fix eventlet. There is an open issue in eventlet[3] for this open since October 2021. Based on the ticket this direction does not seems to feasible. 1) Sean recently opened an issue[4] on fasteners to restore a previously existing workaround that could fix our issues. If an new fasteners lib is released with the workaround[5] then at least oslo.concurrency requirements needs to be bumped and a new oslo release is pushed. 2) If the fasteners' maintainer does not accept [4][5] in time then I have an oslo.concurrency patch[6] that implements a workaround in oslo. This also requires a new olso.concurrency release. Also this means that projects that are using fasteners.ReaderWriterLock directly need to re-implement the fix locally. 3) If all odds fails I have a nova only patch[7] that implements the workaround locally in nova. Note that this issue is present in stable/yoga and on master. On stable/xena we uses fasteners < 0.15.0 which is not affected. Cheers, gibi [1] https://github.com/openstack/oslo.concurrency/blob/052b2f23572900601b0f4138… [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.concurrency/+bug/1988311 [3] https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/issues/731 [4] https://github.com/harlowja/fasteners/issues/96 [5] https://github.com/harlowja/fasteners/pull/97 [6] https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug/1988311+project:openstack/oslo.concu… [7] https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug/1988311+project:openstack/nova

2 2

[ops][largescale-sig] rabbitmq and the durability of reply_ queues
by Felix Hüttner 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

Hi everyone, the largescale-sig currently recommends the following rabbitmq policy [1]: '^(?!(amq\.)|(.*_fanout_)|(reply_)).*'. If I found the history of this setting correctly, it resulted from this mailinglist thread [2] which came to the conclusion: > * use durable-queue and replication for long-running queues/exchanges > * use non-durable-queue without replication for short (fanout, reply_) queues However I am unsure if reply_ queues are actually shorted lived than the "long-running" ones. If we take the example of the cinder-scheduler we have the following queues: * cinder-scheduler: Tied to the lifetime of the whole cinder-scheduler cluster; currently durable + replicated * cinder-scheduler.myhostname: Tied to the lifetime of the cinder-scheduler service, but not removed when the service stops; currently durable + replicated * cinder-scheduler_fanout_somerandomid: Tied to the lifetime of the cinder-scheduler service, but removed when the service stops; currently neither durable nor replicated * reply_somerandomid: Tied to the lifetime of the cinder-scheduler service, but removed when the service stops; currently neither durable nor replicated If I read got all of the above correctly then reply_ and fanout queues are actually not shorter lived than the normal queue to send requests to that service. The only difference is that we remove them when the service itself stops. Therefor I want to propose the question if we should not also make these queues durable and replicated. Thank you [1]: https://docs.openstack.org/large-scale/other/rabbitmq.html#pattern [2]: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-August/016562.… -- Felix Huettner Diese E Mail enthält möglicherweise vertrauliche Inhalte und ist nur für die Verwertung durch den vorgesehenen Empfänger bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfänger sein, setzen Sie den Absender bitte unverzüglich in Kenntnis und löschen diese E Mail. Hinweise zum Datenschutz finden Sie hier<https://www.datenschutz.schwarz>.

2 2

[puppet] Gate blocker: enabling neutron-ovn-metadata-agent consistently fails in CentOS Stream 9
by Takashi Kajinami 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

Hello, Currently we are facing a problem with integration jobs with ml2+ovn in CentOS Stream 9 ( puppet-openstack-integration-7-scenario00[35]-tempest-centos-9-stream ) and these jobs are consistently failing. Details can be found in https://launchpad.net/bugs/1988552 . I've already reported the issue to RDO and CentOS Stream to get their help while I'm also implementing a temporary workaround. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/puppet-openstack-integration/+/855617 Please avoid rechecking/approving patches until these jobs are fixed. Thank you, Takashi

1 1

Re: Secret getPayload() openstack4j
by Srinivasan T 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

Hi, Does anyone have any idea on this? >From the REST API documentation, it seems GET /v1/secret/{uuid} may not fetch the payload and we need to use a different endpoint GET /v1/secret/{uuid}/payload . Is there any equivalent Java API (openstack4j) for this? Regards, Srini On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 11:08 PM Srinivasan T <tsrini.alr(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Artem for the response. > > I face the same issue when using the below version as well (snippet from > pom.xml), > > <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> > <artifactId>openstack4j-core</artifactId> > <name>OpenStack4j Core</name> > <description>OpenStack Java API</description> > <url>http://github.com/openstack4j/openstack4j/</url> > > Regards, > Srini > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:48 PM Artem Goncharov <artem.goncharov(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The library is not an official OpenStack delivery. I guess nobody here >> would be able to give you proper suggestion. Moreover it does not look like >> being actively maintained. >> >> Regards, >> Artem >> >> On 5. Sep 2022, at 18:03, Srinivasan T <tsrini.alr(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm unable to get the secret's payload from openstack4j, it always >> returns null. >> >> Secret secret = os.barbican().secrets().get("19cbc4e8-cd06-450b-aa5d-2a4d20bf7d60"); >> secret.getPayload(); //Always returns null >> >> The same works when using the OpenStack CLI, >> >> openstack secret get --payload_content_type 'application/octet-stream' --file secret-payload http://x.x.x.x:9311/v1/secrets/19cbc4e8-cd06-450b-aa5d-2a4d20bf7d60 >> >> I'm using the below OpenStack4j version, >> >> Bundle-Name: OpenStack4j Core >> >> Bundle-Version: 3.6.0 >> >> OpenStack is in Queens version. >> >> Let me know if someone can help on this. >> Regards, >> Srini >> >> >>

1 0

Kolla-ansible all-in-one and Hyper Converged solution
by KK CHN 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

Hi, [1 ] I am aiming for a prototype of HCI on a DELL ( R650 2 CPU and 40 cores . 2.4 TB) server machine. The Operating System choice is Debian 10. [2] Right now I am successful in Kolla-ansible all-in-one installation of Wallaby/stable on a Debian 10 Virtual machine with the default configs enabled as in the documentation " https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/kolla-ansible/wallaby/uicks… " in Virtualenv setup. Able to get the horizon dashboard with the default services enabled and created and tested the cirros VM launching .. working fine. [3 ] I have to repeat the same all-in-one deployment on the physical machine as in [1] with the default configs and then convert it as an HCI node. What all features do I need to configure / enable in all-in-on / globals.yml to convert this box as a working HCI node ? Any hints / directives for the essential configurations needed for this server box to convert it as an HCI node are most welcome. kindly shed some light on this and any reference documents/URLs to do this ? Thank you, Krish

5 5

Microstack - VM networking & installation probs
by Tim Kahlke 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

Hi, I tried to install microstack 245 via Canonical and am running into the “old” VM-can’t-connect-external-network problem. OS: Ubuntu 20.04 Microstack v245 Install seems to have worked ok using sudo snap install microstack --beta. However, journalctl -xe shows ovsdb-server[83528]: ovs|26322|socket_util|ERR|6642:0.0.0.0: bind: Address already in use But not sure if that’s related or not. Network setup is the default, i.e., external 10.20.20.0/24 and internal 192.168.1.0/24. From the host machine I can ping the VMs and vice versa, but I can’t get past the host from the VM. I tried to apply some of the solutions I found on the web, so far without success. This one seems to work for people but my microstack doesn’t seem to have the ovs-vsctl command anywhere. Any suggestions would be much appreciated. Tim

2 1

[manila] LVM shares are unmounted on reboot
by Vaibhav 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

Dear All, One of the host running Manila-share service has rebooted. After the reboot the LVMs are not mounted on the Manila mount points. I use LVM Driver with DHSS=False. default_share_type = default_share_type share_name_template = manila-%s rootwrap_config = /etc/manila/rootwrap.conf api_paste_config = /etc/manila/api-paste.ini auth_strategy = keystone my_ip=192.168.82.2 enabled_share_backends = lvm enabled_share_protocols = NFS state_path=/var/lib/manila [lvm] share_backend_name = LVM share_driver = manila.share.drivers.lvm.LVMShareDriver driver_handles_share_servers = False lvm_share_volume_group = VGZunManila lvm_share_export_ips = 192.168.82.2 lvm_share_export_root = $state_path/mnt After the reboot LVMs are there but they are mounted on their respective share location. Any way to solve this and this to be done automatically? Regards, Vaibhav

2 2

[all][elections][ptl][tc] Combined PTL/TC antelope cycle Election Nominations Last Days - FINAL REMINDER
by Amy Marrich 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

This is your last reminder for the election, I know the US , CA, and a few other countries are on holiday today. Please also read Jeremy's early email about the TC seats and governance. Thank, Amy\ ----------------------------------------------- A quick reminder that we are in the last hours for declaring PTL and TC candidacies. Nominations are open until Sep 07, 2022 23:45 UTC. If you want to stand for election, don't delay, follow the instructions at [1] to make sure the community knows your intentions. Make sure your nomination has been submitted to the openstack/election repository and approved by election officials. Election statistics[2]: Nominations started @ 2022-08-24 23:45:00 UTC Nominations end @ 2022-09-07 23:45:00 UTC Nominations duration : 14 days, 0:00:00 Nominations remaining : 2 days, 4:16:33 Nominations progress : 84.44% --------------------------------------------------- Projects[1] : 52 Projects with candidates : 35 ( 67.31%) Projects with election : 0 ( 0.00%) --------------------------------------------------- Need election : 0 () Need appointment : 17 (Adjutant Barbican Keystone Masakari Mistral OpenStackSDK OpenStack_Charms Openstack_Chef Oslo Release_Management Requirements Sahara Senlin Skyline Swift Venus Zun) =================================================== Stats gathered @ 2022-09-05 19:28:27 UTC This means that with approximately 2 days left, 17 projects will be deemed leaderless. In this case the TC will oversee PTL selection as described by [3]. Thank you, [1] https://governance.openstack.org/election/#how-to-submit-a-candidacy [2] Any open reviews at https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:open+project:openstack/election have not been factored into these stats. [3] https://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141128-elections-process-for…

1 0

[neutron] Team meeting on Sept. 6 cancelled
by Lajos Katona 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

Hi, Sorry for late mail, but tomorrow I can't drive the team meeting, so I have to cancel it. I will be otherwise available tomorrow (except around the meeting time), so you can reach me on neutron channel for example. Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)

1 0

Error During installation devstack ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'neutron'
by mahdi n 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

I was installing DevStack on Ubuntu 20.04 when I encountered this error It says that the Neutron module was not found while neutron is installed ++lib/neutron_plugins/ovn_agent:filter_network_api_extensions:439 > /usr/local/bin/python3.8 -c 'from neutron.common.ovn import extensions ;\ > > print(",".join(extensions.ML2_SUPPORTED_API_EXTENSIONS)) > ' > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "<string>", line 1, in <module> > > ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'neutron' > > +lib/neutron_plugins/ovn_agent:filter_network_api_extensions:439 > >

3 2

[all][election][tc] TC election at risk of single-employer majority
by Jeremy Stanley 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

The extended nomination period for the upcoming TC election closes in just over two days. We need to elect people to fill 4 of the 9 seats on the TC during this round. We currently have just enough candidates to fill the open seats, but in so doing we would end up with a majority of the TC members employed by the same company. Appendix 4 of the bylaws of the Open Infrastructure Foundation, the Technical Committee Member Policy[*], states: > In the event of a Technical Committee election that would result > in half or more of the members of the Technical Committee being > Affiliated, the Board of Directors may defer the effective date of > office of the newly elected Technical Committee members who are > Affiliated for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days after a > resolution by the Board of Directors approving such deferral. The > Board of Directors must pass such resolution within thirty (30) > days of the notice of election results from the Technical > Committee. During such period of deferral, the Technical Committee > and the Board of Directors shall work to resolve the issue by > agreement among themselves, such as by a resignation of one or > more Technical Committee members or having the Individual Member > with the next highest number of votes become a member of the > Technical Committee. If the Technical Committee and the Board of > Directors are not able to agree on a resolution within such thirty > (30) day period, the Board of Directors may require another > election for such positions. In order to avoid this outcome, we need additional nominees with a variety of affiliations immediately. If you've considered running for a seat on the OpenStack TC before, now is definitely the time. Please see earlier announcements[**] from the election officials for details on how to submit your nomination. Thanks! [*] https://openinfra.dev/legal/openstack-technical-committee-member-policy [**] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-August/030094.… https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-August/030241.… -- Jeremy Stanley

1 0

Secret getPayload() openstack4j
by Srinivasan T 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

Hi, I'm unable to get the secret's payload from openstack4j, it always returns null. Secret secret = os.barbican().secrets().get("19cbc4e8-cd06-450b-aa5d-2a4d20bf7d60"); secret.getPayload(); //Always returns null The same works when using the OpenStack CLI, openstack secret get --payload_content_type 'application/octet-stream' --file secret-payload http://x.x.x.x:9311/v1/secrets/19cbc4e8-cd06-450b-aa5d-2a4d20bf7d60 I'm using the below OpenStack4j version, Bundle-Name: OpenStack4j Core Bundle-Version: 3.6.0 OpenStack is in Queens version. Let me know if someone can help on this. Regards, Srini

2 1

[adjutant][magnum][mistral][sahara][watcher][zaqar][tc] broken gate for deliverables
by Előd Illés 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

Hi, Now that we have passed Zed-3 milestone, Release team starts to check the health of deliverables via their gate healthiness. The 1st round of checks showed that the following deliverables seem to have blocked gates: python-adjutantclient [1] python-magnumclient [2] python-mistralclient [3] python-saharaclient [4] python-watcherclient [5] python-zaqarclient [6] We are asking the teams to fix their gates and propose a release after it is fixed as soon as possible, otherwise these deliverables might not be part of the official Zed release. [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-adjutantclient/+/855763 [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-magnumclient/+/855778 [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-mistralclient/+/855781 [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-zaqarclient/+/855796 [5] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-watcherclient/+/855795 [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-saharaclient/+/855787 Thanks, Előd Illés irc: elodilles

2 1

http proxy support
by Oliver Weinmann 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to set a http proxy in kolla-ansible during deployment / update etc. Today I wanted to pull new containers and this saturates our internet connection. What we usually do is have machine that massively download stuff from the internet use a squid proxy that throttles their bandwidth. I found the following feature request: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1829586 And it seems some work had been done, but I can't seem to find any info if the change really made it into production: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/692006/ Any help or hints are highly appreciated. Cheers, Oliver

2 4

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary 2022 Sept 2: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hello Everyone, Here is this week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. TC Meetings: ============ * We had this week's meeting on Sept 01. Most of the meeting discussions are summarized in this email. Meeting full recording is available @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDfOx1m-wog and summary logs are available @https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-09-01-15.01.log.html * Next TC weekly meeting will be on Sept 08 Thursday at 15:00 UTC, feel free to add the topic on the agenda[1] by Sept 07. 2. What we completed this week: ========================= * Appointed Dale Smith as Adjutant PTL for Zed cycle[2] * Switched requirements to distributed leadership [3] * Added Exception for the combined 2023.1(Antelope) elections [4] 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for Zed cycle ------------------------------ * Zed tracker etherpad includes the TC working items[5], four are completed and others items are in-progress. Open Reviews ----------------- * Four open reviews for ongoing activities[6]. 2023.1 cycle Technical Election (TC + PTL) planning ------------------------------------------------------------- By considering the holiday weeks, we decided to extend the nomination by a week[7]. The new deadline for nomination is Sept 7 [8]. We request you not to delay your nomination for PTL or TC. Define 2023.1 cycle testing runtime ------------------------------------------- Testing runtime for the 2023.1 cycle is up for review [9]. 2023.1 cycle TC PTG planning ------------------------------------ Updates on PTG planning: * "TC + Leader interaction" sessions is scheduled for Oct 17 Monday 15-17 UTC[10], * I have created the TC PTG etherpad to collect the topic[11]. * I sent email about the 'Operator Hours' slots in this PTG, please check and reserve the operator hour slot for your project[12] 2021 User Survey TC Question Analysis ----------------------------------------------- No update on this. The survey summary is up for review[13]. Feel free to check and provide feedback. Fixing Zuul config error ---------------------------- Requesting projects with zuul config error to look into those and fix them which should not take much time[14]15]. Project updates ------------------- * Switch release management to distributed leadership[16] 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[17]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15 UTC [18] 3. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/849606 [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/854685 [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/854624 [5] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker [6] https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+status:open [7] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-August/030241.… [8] https://governance.openstack.org/election/ [9] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/854375 [10] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-September/0303… [11] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023-1-ptg [12] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-September/0303… [13] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/836888 [14] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zuul-config-error-openstack [15] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-May/028603.html [16] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/855276 [17] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [18] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting -gmann

1 0

[tc][ptl] TC + Community Leaders interaction in 2023.1 Antelope Virtual PTG
by Ghanshyam Mann 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hello Everyone, We had successful TC+Community leaders interaction sessions in the last couple of PTG, and we will continue the same for 2023.1 cycle PTG also. I have created the poll to select the best suitable time. It will be for two hours (single or two sessions) either on Monday or Tuesday. Please add your preference in the below doodle poll (including TC members): - https://framadate.org/zsOqRxfVcmtjaPBC Also, I have created the below etherpad with the draft agenda, If you as PTL or project representatives or SIG Chair and would like to attend this session, please add your name: - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-leaders-interaction-2023-1 -gmann

1 1

[tripleo] gate blocker tripleo-ci-centos-9-content-provider
by Chandan Kumar 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hello tripleo, Please hold your recheck on master tripleo branch, we have a gate blocker for tripleo-ci-centos-9-content-provider. https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1988514 The team is currently working on fixing it. With Regards, Chandan Kumar

2 1

[PTL][release] Zed Cycle Highlights
by Előd Illés 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hi, This is a reminder, that *this week* is the week for Cycle highlights [1][2]! They need to be added to deliverable yamls so that they can be included in release marketing preparations. (See the details about how to add them at the project team guide [3].) [1]https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html [2]https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html#z-cycle-highlights [3] https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html#cycle… Thanks, Előd Illés irc: elodilles

4 6

[release] Release countdown for week R-4, Sep 05 - 09
by Előd Illés 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Development Focus ----------------- We just passed feature freeze! Until release branches are cut, you should stop accepting featureful changes to deliverables following the cycle-with-rc release model, or to libraries. Exceptions should be discussed on separate threads on the mailing-list, and feature freeze exceptions approved by the team's PTL. Focus should be on finding and fixing release-critical bugs, so that release candidates and final versions of the Zed deliverables can be proposed, well ahead of the final Zed release date. General Information ------------------- We are still finishing up processing a few release requests, but the Zed release requirements are now frozen. If new library releases are needed to fix release-critical bugs in Zed, you must request a Requirements Freeze Exception (RFE) from the requirements team before we can do a new release to avoid having something released in Zed that is not actually usable. This is done by posting to the openstack-discuss mailing list with a subject line similar to: [$PROJECT][requirements] RFE requested for $PROJECT_LIB Include justification/reasoning for why a RFE is needed for this lib. If/when the requirements team OKs the post-freeze update, we can then process a new release. A soft String freeze is now in effect, in order to let the I18N team do the translation work in good conditions. In Horizon and the various dashboard plugins, you should stop accepting changes that modify user-visible strings. Exceptions should be discussed on the mailing-list. By September 15th, 2022 this will become a hard string freeze, with no changes in user-visible strings allowed. Actions ------- stable/zed branches should be created soon for all not-already-branched libraries. You should expect 2-3 changes to be proposed for each: a .gitreview update, a reno update (skipped for projects not using reno), and a tox.ini constraints URL update. Please review those in priority so that the branch can be functional ASAP. The Prelude section of reno release notes is rendered as the top level overview for the release. Any important overall messaging for Zed changes should be added there to make sure the consumers of your release notes see them. Finally, if you haven't proposed Zed cycle-highlights yet, then it's time to do that as soon as possible. Please see the email for details: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-August/030223.… Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- RC1 deadline: September 15th, 2022 (R-3 week) Final RC deadline: September 29th, 2022 (R-1 week) Final Zed release: October 5th, 2022 PTG: October 17-21, 2022 (Virtual!) Előd Illés irc: elodilles

1 0

Kolla-ansible Openstack : Queries on Metering and Rating Module
by KK CHN 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

I have installed all-in-one using Kolla-ansible wallaby on a Virtual Machine (Debian 10) By default configurations up and running are able to create VMs .. with the default Cirros image. I want the Metering and Billing modules for a deployment scenario. So I used this setup as a PILOT and use ceilometer with cloudkitty and gnocchi.. I have enabled ( correct me If I am wrong or missing any other directives for metering and rating other than this if required => enable_ceilometer : "yes" enable_cloudkitty : "yes" enable_gnocchi : "yes" , enable_horizon_cloudkitty : "{{ enable_cloudkitty |bool }}" cloudkitty_collector_backend: "gnocchi" in /etc/kolla/globals.yml Then re deployed the all in one $ ( (venvopenstack) cloud@wallaby:~$ kolla-ansible -i ./all-in-one bootstrap-servers , (venvopenstack) cloud@Xena:~$ kolla-ansible -i ./all-in-one prechecks, (venvopenstack) cloud@Xena:~$ kolla-ansible -i ./all-in-one deploy ) .. All went well up and able to access horizon dashboard. How to view the metrics and ratings :: I am able to get Admin => Rating tab Enabled the three Rating Modules there. (Hashmap, noop, pyscripts) .. Rating Summary : I am getting as below All CloudTotal 0 LL <http://10.184.48.94/admin/rating_summary/ALL> Cloud Total <http://10.184.48.94/admin/rating_summary/ALL> 0 Hashmap and pyscrips tab nothing to view , its empty. How can I use this Rating module and how to get useful values there ? Or is there any other configurations I have to make to get a better metering and billing utility using these tools. Kindly share your tips and expertise with these tools. What / where to refer to get a nice Rating/metering configurations using these tools.( Or do I need to enable / configure more directives or resources ??) I have not seen a highly populated Rating Module interface in Horizon so it should be. Any reference images and configurations are most welcome. Thank you, Krish

3 5

[heat][elections] PTL Candidacy for Antelope Cycle
by Brendan Shephard 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hi all, I first wanted to thank Rico for his ongoing commitment to the project over the last cycles. He has provided lots of guidance and help to the Heat project for a long time and his contribution deserves recognition. I am proposing my candidacy for Heat PTL during the Antelope cycle. I have worked with the Heat project for several years both as a user and more recently over the last 2 years as a contributor. I see great potential in the project for our users and look forward to continuing work in order to support features and functionality of the project. Some of my objectives for the next few cycles are: Remove the dependencies on legacy python-*client libraries and instead shift to the openstacksdk client library. While the legacy libraries have served us well, they are starting to show their limitations and the delta in servicibilty will only increase as each project moves towards leveraging the openstacksdk. So this change, while quite extensive will ensure future compatibility with the other OpenStack project teams. Continue ensuring Heat supports the most up-to-date and recent features provided by each project. To ensure Heat is the default and best choice for our users, we need to ensure we are able to leverage the latest available features from the complimentary OpenStack projects. This is an ongoing challenge to stay up-to-date with the changes each cycle and work towards implementing them in Heat. Thank you all for you consideration, and I look forward to the next cycle and continuing to work with you all. Regards, Brendan

3 2

Unable to change the app-name / programname for barbican-api service
by Rohit Singh 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hi guys, I am facing issues with barbican-api logging with syslog. I have configured rsyslog for barbican service and want to write the logs on remote host based on %programname properties, But I observed that the barbican-api app-name is not set ,so by default it's logging into loadwsgi.py.log . Is there any way to set the app-name for barbican-api service ? Regards Rohit Singh Mob : +91- 88824 68891

1 0

Unable to change the app-name / programname for barbican-api service
by Rohit Kumar Singh 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hi guys, I am facing issues with barbican-api logging with syslog. I have configured rsyslog for barbican service and want to write the logs on remote host based on %programname properties, but i observed barbican-api app-name is not set ,so by default it's logging into loadwsgi.py.log . I s there any way to set the app-name for barbican-api service ?

1 0

[all][elections][tc] TC Election Non-Candidacy ...
by Jay Bryant 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

All, I wanted to take a moment to let everyone know that I am not going to be running for the TC, this time around. The last two years on the TC have been a great experience and I am grateful for the trust the community put in me. At this point, however, I think it is best to let others who may want to join the TC have the opportunity to do so. Again, thank you for this opportunity to support the community over the last couple of years! Sincerely, Jay Bryant (jungleboyj)

3 2

[manila] Feature freeze exceptions
by Carlos Silva 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hello, Zorillas and interested stackers! During today's Manila weekly meeting we went over the status of our open changes that are eligible for feature freeze. Some candidates for the deadline were successfully merged over the course of this week, but there are also a few other changes that are receiving feedback from reviewers. Those changes will need some extra time to get in. We are in a shortage of reviewers to take care of all of the changes at once, and we are extending the deadline by one week. The changes yet to be merged and receiving the feature freeze exception are: *Metadata for share snapshots [1]* During the Yoga cycle, Manila metadata APIs were changed to be more generic and be able to accommodate metadata for other resources. For Zed, we planned to have metadatas being added to the snapshot resources. This change has received some reviews and seems to be quite close to being merged. During the tests, the manipulation of metadata for share snapshots seems to work just fine, and we are only getting some final tweaks to the implementation. *Refactor the Ceph NFS driver to use Cephadm NFS [2]* This is a driver-only change and it does not impact the Manila core itself. It is important for people consuming the Ceph drivers, and does not impact the current driver implementation. *Support share transfer between project [3]* This change is currently under review and is a good addition to the Manila core. Due to the shortage of reviewers, we only got more people looking at the change and testing the functionality late in the cycle. The three changes aforementioned should be merged by next Thursday (08 september 2022). [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/825008 [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/848987 [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/843832 In case you have questions or concerns, please let me know. Thank you, carloss

1 0

[all] [oslo.messaging] Interest in collaboration on a NATS driver
by Tobias Urdin 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hello everyone, Before continuing on, yes this kind of is a massive effort but it doesn’t have to be, it would be very cool to get a replacement for RabbitMQ as I’m probably not the only one not satisfied with it. I've proposed a very bare POC in [1] but it's long way from being finished, but atleast some basic devstack is passing. NATS [2] is a cloud-native scalable messaging system that supports the one-to-many and pub-sub methods that we can use to implement it as a oslo.messaging driver. This would make OpenStack easier to deploy in a highly available fashion, reduce outages related to RabbitMQ, free up memory and CPU usage by RabbitMQ (it’s insane when using clustering) and embrace a more cloud-native approach for our software that runs the cloud, alternatives is also welcome :) The POC has a lot of things that could be improved for example: • Do retries and acknowledgements in the library (since NATS does NOT persist messages like RabbitMQ could) • Handle reconnects or interruptions (for example resubscribe to topics etc) • Timeouts need to be implemented and handled • Investigate maximum message payload size • Find or maintain a NATS python library that doesn't use async like the official one does • Add a lot of testing • Cleanup everything noted as TODO in the POC code Now I couldn’t possibly pull this off myself without some collaboration with all of you, even though I’m very motivated to just dig in and do this for the rest of the year and migrate our test fleet there I unfortunately (like everyone else) is juggeling a lot of balls at the same time. If anybody, or any company, out there would be interested in collaborating in a project to bring this support and maintain it feel free to reach out. I’m hoping somebody will bite but atleast I’ve put it out there for all of you. Best regards Tobias [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.messaging/+/848338 [2] https://nats.io

4 7

[neutron] Drivers meeting - Friday 02.09.2022 - cancelled
by Lajos Katona 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hi Neutron Drivers! Due to the lack of agenda, let's cancel tomorrow's drivers meeting. See You on the meeting next week. Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)

1 0

[cinder] experiences with S3 cinder-backup driver // client-side encryption feature
by Christian Rohmann 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hello openstack-discuss and cinder-backup users! There is an S3 driver available for cinder-backup since the Wallaby release already, see https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/cinder/wallaby.html#relnotes-18-0-0…. 1) I was wondering if anybody already used that on a somewhat larger scale and what you experiences are about performance, stability and compatibility? 2) What object storage implementation or external service were / are you using? 3) While there are options like "backup_s3_sse_customer_algorithm" and "backup_s3_sse_customer_key" make use of server-side-encryption (SSE), there seems to be no way to encrypt the data before actually sending it to the remote S3 (read: client-side encryption). Since the boto3 Python SDK by AWS is used, which does not actually implement CSE, like other language SDKs do (see my issue: https://github.com/boto/boto3/issues/3395) it seems obvious why that is not a totally low-hanging fruit. But there are ways to add this, check out the references to e.g. https://github.com/StephenSorriaux/s3-encryption in the mentioned boto3 issue. Encrypting data before sending it off to a potentially externally operated service seems like a nice feature. Even a single encryption key would then protect that data from having to trust a 3rd party. I know encrypted cinder volumes would also work, but they are not as commonly used. * Is CSE something that others would also like to see for the S3 driver? * Cinder devs, would this maybe be worth a spec for the next cycle? Regards Christian

1 0

[ovn-bgp-agent][neutron] - expose_tenant_networks bug
by Satish Patel 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Folks, I am setting up ovn-bgp-agent lab in "BGP mode" and i found everything working great except expose tenant network https://ltomasbo.wordpress.com/2021/02/04/ovn-bgp-agent-testing-setup/ Lab Summary: 1 controller node 3 compute node ovn-bgp-agent running on all compute node because i am using "enable_distributed_floating_ip=True" ovn-bgp-agent config: [DEFAULT] debug=False expose_tenant_networks=True driver=ovn_bgp_driver reconcile_interval=120 ovsdb_connection=unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock I am not seeing my vm on tenant ip getting exposed but when i attach FIP which gets exposed in loopback address. here is the full trace of debug logs: https://paste.opendev.org/show/buHiJ90nFgC1JkQxZwVk/

2 9

help: set ironic inspect autodiscovery failed
by 陈薇 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi All, I'm trying the ironic inspect autodiscovery but failed. What I did: Set the inspector.conf 1. [discovery] enroll_node_driver = ipmi [processing] permit_active_introspection = true processing_hooks = $default_processing_hooks,extra_hardware,lldp_basic Configure the python agent: inspection_callback_url: There's no node automatically added. I enter the host and read the log of python agent, no inspect related log. Could anybody give any advice about how to triage or setup correctly? Thanks & Regards, Wei

1 1

[election][openstack-ansible] PTL candidacy for Antelope cycle
by Dmitriy Rabotyagov 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hello. I want to self-nominate for the role of OpenStack-Ansible PTL for the Antelope release cycle. As always, my goal will be to constantly improve existing code, make deployments and further operations as reliable as possible. For the previous cycle we have reached some of previously defined goals, like adding a `service` role, finally implementing service_token_roles and support of CentOS 9 Stream, but there is still room for improvement for role testing. With the return of live events I will do my best to ensure project presence on them and get in touch with operators to gain feedback for project future improvement. -- Kind regards, Dmitriy Rabotyagov

2 1

[all][tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting on 2022 Sept 1 at 1500 UTC
by Ghanshyam Mann 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hello Everyone, Below is the agenda for Tomorrow's TC meeting schedule at 1500 UTC. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting * Roll call * Follow up on past action items * Gate health check ** Bare 'recheck' state *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary * Checks on Zed cycle tracker ** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker * 2023.1 cycle PTG Planning ** TC + Leaders interaction sessions *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-leaders-interaction-2023-1 ** TC PTG etherpad *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023-1-ptg ** Schedule 'operator hours' as a separate slot in PTG(avoiding conflicts among other projects 'operator hours') *** https://twitter.com/osopsmeetup/status/1561708283492196353 *** https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/bD9kR2yd * 2023.1 cycle Technical Election ** https://governance.openstack.org/election/ * Open Reviews ** https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open -gmann

1 0

[cinder] Extending Feature Freeze Deadline by 1 week
by Rajat Dhasmana 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi All, As discussed in the cinder meeting today, due to the abundance of features proposed[1] and the shortage of review bandwidth, we are planning to extend the feature freeze by one week. Current feature freeze date (for cinder): 01 September 2022 New feature freeze date (for cinder): 08 September 2022 Kindly let me know if there are any objections to the above proposal else all the features proposed are eligible for the feature freeze exception of 1 week. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-zed-features Thanks and regards Rajat Dhasmana

1 0

[election][manila] PTL Candidacy for Antelope cycle
by Carlos Silva 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Greetings, Zorillas and interested stackers, I would like to announce my candidacy to be the Manila PTL during the Antelope cycle. I have been the PTL for Manila since the Zed cycle, and have been contributing to OpenStack since the Stein release. It has been an awesome experience. Over the Zed cycle my focus was to continue mentoring and adding new core reviewers to the Manila repositories; Pursuing feature parity and complete support for manila in OSC (also increasing our functional tests coverage), tackling the tech debt; enhancing the documentation to help third party drivers to set up their CI systems; promoting events to gather the community members and getting bugs fixed and implementations moving faster. I am happy with the progress we made in those areas, but I still think there is room for improvement. During the Antelope cycle, I would like to focus on: - Continue our efforts to mentor contributors and increase the amount of active reviewers through engaging them in the community, teaching the OpenStack way and making it collaboratively as we did in the past cycles, promoting hackathons, bug squashes and collaborative review sessions. - Getting more features already available in the Manila core to Manila UI and get more attention to our changes to OpenStack SDK; - Continue pushing Manila to cover the tech debt areas we identified over the past cycles; - Enforcing maintainers to collaboratively cover the lack of documentation we have on third party CI setups for Manila, helping potential new vendors to quickly setup up their CI systems; Thank you for your consideration! Carlos da Silva IRC: carloss

3 2

[cinder] Antelope PTG Planning
by Rajat Dhasmana 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi All, The virtual PTG for Antelope/2023.1 cycle will be held between 17-21 October 2022. The proposed schedule for cinder is as follows: Dates: Tuesday (18th October) to Friday (21st October) 2022 Time: 1300 to 1700 UTC Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/antelope-ptg-cinder-planning Please add topics to the etherpad as early as possible since that will help arrange the topics day wise in the actual PTG etherpad. Thanks and regards Rajat Dhasmana

1 0

[QA][ironic] cycle-with-intermediary deliverables without any release
by Előd Illés 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi, Quick reminder that we'll need a release very soon for a number of deliverables following a cycle-with-intermediary release model but which have not done *any* release yet in the Zed cycle: [ironic*] bifrost ironic-prometheus-exporter ironic-python-agent-builder ironic-ui networking-baremetal networking-generic-switch [Quality Assurance] patrole Those should be released ASAP, and in all cases before September 15th, so that we have a release to include in the final Zed release. (* actually, we DID discuss this already with Ironic release liaisons [1], so this is just a formal reminder for them) [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-release/%23openstack-rele… Előd Illés irc: elodilles

1 0

[OVN] Error while creating a new instance due to port binding failure
by 박경원 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

1 0

[largescale-sig] Next meeting: August 31st, 15utc
by Thierry Carrez 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi everyone, The Large Scale SIG is back from its extended vacation! We will be meeting this Wednesday in #openstack-operators on OFTC IRC, at 15UTC. You can check how that time translates locally at: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20220831T15 Feel free to add topics to the agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting Regards, -- Thierry Carrez

1 1

Take the OpenStack User Survey! Deadline Today!
by Allison Price 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi everyone, I wanted to remind you that today is the last day to complete your 2022 OpenStack User Survey. If you (or a customer) is operating an OpenStack environment, please take time to complete the deployment survey. If you have completed it before, you will just need to update your information, but your previous responses will auto-populate. Complete here: https://www.openstack.org/usersurvey <https://www.openstack.org/usersurvey> Please let me know if you have any issues. Cheers, Allison

1 0

[charms] Nominate Luciano Giudice for charms-ceph core
by Chris MacNaughton 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hello all, I'd like to propose Luciano as a new Ceph charms core team member. He has contributed quality changes over the last year, and has been providing quality reviews for the Ceph charms. patches: https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:luciano.logiudice%2540canonical.com reviews: https://review.opendev.org/q/reviewedby:luciano.logiudice%2540canonical.com I hope you will join me in supporting Luciano. Chris MacNaughton

4 3

[election][cloudkitty] PTL candidacy for Antelope
by Rafael Weingärtner 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi all, I would like to self-nominate for the role of PTL of CloudKitty for the Antelope release cycle. I have been PTL since the Victoria cycle and I am willing to continue in this role. I will keep working with existing contributors to maintain CloudKitty for their use cases and encourage the addition of new functionalities. -- Rafael Weingärtner

1 0