- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[Octavia] Monitor through Listener Prometheus Protocol
by Vu Tuan Dat 15 Aug '22

15 Aug '22

HI, I installed Prometheus on controller nodes. However, My prometheus instance cannot connect to Listener Prometheus endpoint because it's binded to VIP only in network namespace. Anyone can help? Thanks in advanced, Dat

2 1

[Ansible] [Yoga] Set rsyslog not to containerise
by Father Vlasie 15 Aug '22

15 Aug '22

Hello everyone! I am trying to deploy Openstack Ansible with Rocky Linux 8.6. I have a rsyslog host that is somewhat underpowered (RAM and CPU) and I thought it might help to run rsyslog without containerisation. I have searched but I have not been able to find an example of this.My guess is that I need to create a file in /etc/openstack_deploy/env.d What syntax and commands do I need? I have searched but I could not find any examples... Thank you very much! Father Vlasie

2 1

[ironic] Proposing Jacob Anders to sushy-core
by Iury Gregory 15 Aug '22

15 Aug '22

Hello ironic-cores and sushy-cores, I would like to propose Jacob Anders (janders irc) for sushy-core. He made great contributions to improve sushy to cover corner cases from different HW in the last releases, you can find some of his contributions in [1], please vote with +1/-1. [1] https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:janders%2540redhat.com+project:openstack… -- *Att[]'s* *Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira * *MSc in Computer Science at UFCG* *Ironic PTL * *Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat Brazil* *Social*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/iurygregory *E-mail: iurygregory(a)gmail.com <iurygregory(a)gmail.com>*

3 2

[Ansible] [Yoga] Not recognising Rocky Linux as supported
by Father Vlasie 13 Aug '22

13 Aug '22

Hello everyone! I am trying to deploy Openstack Ansible with Rocky Linux 8.6 on my target hosts. The documentation here (https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/latest/ta…) says " • Centos 8 Stream 64-bit * Derivitives: Rocky Linux” under the list of supported operation systems. Ansible does not seem to check for the existence of RHEL 8 systems. :( But when I run “openstack-ansible setup-hosts.yml” I get the error: TASK [Check for a supported Operating System] ***************************************************************************************** fatal: [infra1]: FAILED! => { "assertion": "(ansible_facts['distribution'] == 'Debian' and ansible_facts['distribution_release'] == 'bullseye') or (ansible_facts['distribution'] == 'Ubuntu' and ansible_facts['distribution_release'] == 'focal') or (ansible_facts['distribution'] == 'Ubuntu' and ansible_facts['distribution_release'] == 'jammy') or (ansible_facts['os_family'] == 'RedHat' and ansible_facts['distribution_major_version'] == '9')", "changed": false, "evaluated_to": false, "msg": "The only supported platforms for this release are Debian 11 (Bullseye), Ubuntu 20.04 LTS (Focal), Ubuntu 22.04 (Jammy) and CentOS 9 Stream.\n” What should I do? Thank you!

3 2

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary 2022 Aug 12: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 13 Aug '22

13 Aug '22

Hello Everyone, Here is this week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. TC Meetings: ============ * We had this week's meeting on Aug 11. Most of the meeting discussions are summarized in this email. Meeting full logs are available @https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-08-11-15.00.log.html * Next TC weekly meeting will be on Aug 18 Thursday at 15:00 UTC, feel free to add the topic on the agenda[1] by Aug 17. 2. What we completed this week: ========================= * None in this week. 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for Zed cycle ------------------------------ * Zed tracker etherpad includes the TC working items[3], Two are completed and others items are in-progress. Open Reviews ----------------- * Two open reviews for ongoing activities[4]. OpenStack TC + Board member meeting ------------------------------------------------ As you might know, OpenStack TC and Board member had a informal meeting on Aug 10[5][6], I am summarizing the discussion here. The Openstack TC has presented the 'OpenStack Updates' to Board meeting in berlin. One of the key part of the updates were 'OpenStack community Challenges' and we could not finish the discussion or brainstorm on these in berlin meeting. We decided to continue the discussion on those (Slide#21)[7]. In this call, we can only cover the first challenge only 'Less Interaction with Operators & Users'. There is no doubt that we are facing this issue at noticeable level (RBAC is good example where we lacked the operator/user feedback). A lot of things including ML, events are discussed on why it is happening and how to improve it. Having ops meetup as a separate event is something many members raised concern about and it will be good to merge these events into other community events like Summit, PTG etc. To try the first step towards that we can invite or welcome operators in Oct virtual PTG and give them a feeling on merging the events with developers event can be beneficial to both the group. On that, Dan suggested the idea of scheduling the 'Operatos Hours' per project in PTG and there we will keep the discussion on operator-centric and the format they want. We continued the discussion on this in TC weekly meeting where we had mixed suggestions on the 'Operator Hours' schedule, either to ask each project to schedule it in their room and operator join or other way around. Before deciding any format, we will be asking operators about their preference. We will continue the discussion on 'OpenStack community Challenges' in the next call which is schedule on 20:00 UTC on Wednesday, November 16[8]. If anyone is interested, feel free to join it. 2023.1 cycle Technical Election (TC + PTL) planning ------------------------------------------------------------- Not much update on this but we will be seeing the election schedule proposed soon. 2023.1 cycle TC PTG planning ------------------------------------ We discussed about how to best encourage/invite operators into the PTG (I wrote in the above section) and based on the operators feedback we will proceed next. We will continue the discussion in the next meeting also. 2021 User Survey TC Question Analysis ----------------------------------------------- No update on this. The survey summary is up for review[9]. Feel free to check and provide feedback. Zed cycle Leaderless projects ---------------------------------- Dale Smith volunteer to be PTL for Adjutant project [10] Fixing Zuul config error ---------------------------- Requesting projects with zuul config error to look into those and fix them which should not take much time[11]12]. Project updates ------------------- * Retire openstack-helm-addons[13] 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[14]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15 UTC [15] 3. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/849997 [3] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker [4] https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+status:open [5] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-August/029886.… [6] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2022-08-board-openstack-sync [7] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1yCiZy_9A6hURXD0BRdr33OlK7Ugch5EgSvF… [8] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-August/029968.… [9] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/836888 [10] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/849606 [11] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zuul-config-error-openstack [12] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-May/028603.html [13] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/849997 [14] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [15] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting -gmann

1 0

Re: [Ansible] [Yoga] Not recognising Rocky Linux as supported
by Father Vlasie 13 Aug '22

13 Aug '22

> On Aug 12, 2022, at 3:13 PM, openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org wrote: > > Comparing https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/stable/yoga/play… <https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/stable/yoga/play…> to https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/master/playbooks… <https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/master/playbooks…> it appears that OpenStack Ansible has removed CentOS Stream/RHEL/Rocky 8 support on master, but the assertion allows it under Yoga. Based on the failure above you must be running master OSA? I would try running the Yoga branch instead. > > The master branch documentation likely needs to be updated as well. That worked perfectly, thank you! :)

1 0

[tc] November 2022 OpenInfra Board Sync
by Jeremy Stanley 12 Aug '22

12 Aug '22

The Open Infrastructure Foundation Board of Directors is endeavoring to engage in regular check-ins with official OpenInfra projects. The goal is for a loosely structured discussion one-hour in length, involving members of the board and the OpenStack TC, along with other interested community members. This is not intended to be a formal presentation, and no materials need to be prepared in advance. I've started an Etherpad where participants can brainstorm potential topics of conversation, time-permitting: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2022-11-board-openstack-sync At the conclusion of the August 10 discussion, we agreed to tentatively schedule the next call for 20:00 UTC on Wednesday, November 16, so I've attached a calendar file which can serve as a convenient schedule hold for this, in case anyone needs it. -- Jeremy Stanley

1 0

OpenStack User Survey
by Jimmy McArthur 12 Aug '22

12 Aug '22

Hi Everyone - Just a quick reminder to please take the OpenStack User Survey [1] This vitally important survey provides direct, anonymized feedback to our Project Teams to help them build better software. If you run a deployment, no matter the size, please take 30 min out of your day to take this survey! Thank you, Jimmy [1] https://openstack.org/user-survey/

1 0

[release] Release countdown for week R-7, Aug 15 - 19
by Előd Illés 12 Aug '22

12 Aug '22

Development Focus ----------------- We are entering the last weeks of the Zed development cycle. From now until the final release, we'll send a countdown email like this every week. It's probably a good time for teams to take stock of their library and client work that needs to be completed yet. The non-client library freeze is coming up, followed closely by the client lib freeze. Please plan accordingly to avoid any last minute rushes to get key functionality in. General Information ------------------- Next week is the Extra-ATC freeze, in preparation for elections. All contributions to OpenStack are valuable, but some are not expressed as Gerrit code changes. Please list active contributors to your project team who do not have a code contribution this cycle, and therefore won't automatically be considered an Active Technical Contributor and allowed to vote. This is done by adding extra-atcs to https://opendev.org/openstack/governance/src/branch/master/reference/projec… before the Extra-ATC freeze on August 18th, 2022. A quick reminder of the upcoming freeze dates. Those vary depending on deliverable type: * General libraries (except client libraries) need to have their last feature release before Non-client library freeze (August 25th, 2022). Their stable branches are cut early. * Client libraries (think python-*client libraries) need to have their last feature release before Client library freeze (September 1st, 2022) * Deliverables following a cycle-with-rc model (that would be most services) observe a Feature freeze on that same date, September 1st, 2022. Any feature addition beyond that date should be discussed on the mailing-list and get PTL approval. After feature freeze, cycle-with-rc deliverables need to produce a first release candidate (and a stable branch) before RC1 deadline (September 15th, 2022) * Deliverables following cycle-with-intermediary model can release as necessary, but in all cases before Final RC deadline (September 29th, 2022) Finally, now is also a good time to start planning what highlights you want for your deliverables in the cycle highlights. The deadline to submit an initial version for those is set to Feature freeze (September 1st, 2022). Background on cycle-highlights: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125613.html Project Team Guide, Cycle-Highlights: https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html#cycle… knelson [at] openstack.org/diablo_rojo on IRC is available if you need help selecting or writing your highlights Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- Extra-ATC freeze: August 18th, 2022 (R-7 week) Non-client library freeze: August 25th, 2022 (R-6 week) Client library freeze: September 1st, 2022 (R-5 week) Zed-3 milestone: September 1st, 2022 (R-5 week) Next PTG: October 17-21, 2022 (virtual PTG!!!) Előd Illés irc: elodilles

1 0

[tripleo] gate blocker tripleo-ci-centos-9-undercloud-upgrade
by Marios Andreou 12 Aug '22

12 Aug '22

o/ tripleo please hold rechecks on master tripleo branch - we have a gate blocker for tripleo-ci-centos-9-undercloud-upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1984175 package/conflict/mirror issue not clear yet - grateful for pointers if you have them

5 10

About the meaning of compute nodes
by 정재철 11 Aug '22

11 Aug '22

If there are many nodes, is it possible to create a high-performance VM? (e.g. Can 2 1 core cpu nodes create 1 2 core cpu VM)

5 5

[tc] August 2022 OpenInfra Board Sync
by Jeremy Stanley 11 Aug '22

11 Aug '22

The Open Infrastructure Foundation Board of Directors is endeavoring to engage in regular check-ins with official OpenInfra projects. The goal is for a loosely structured discussion one-hour in length, involving members of the board and the OpenStack TC, along with other interested community members. This is not intended to be a formal presentation, and no materials need to be prepared in advance. I've started an Etherpad where participants can brainstorm potential topics of conversation, time-permitting: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2022-08-board-openstack-sync I've also created a Framadate poll has in order to identify a few preferred dates and times. Responses must be submitted by Friday, 2022-07-15, in order to provide the board members with time to pick from the available options. The poll can be found here: https://framadate.org/atdFRM8YeUtauSgC Feel free to reply here on the mailing list, or you can reach out to me directly by E-mail or as fungi in the #openstack-tc IRC channel, with any questions you may have. -- Jeremy Stanley

1 3

[kolla] Best way to restart controllers
by Yves Gd 11 Aug '22

11 Aug '22

Hi all, We are looking for the best way to process system upgrades on our controller nodes and especially the best way to restart them (we have 3 controllers nodes with routers ha). If we just restart them one by one (waiting long time between each), we have already seen rabbitmq cluster errors (needing a complete restart of rabbitmq). With a kolla stop, a restart and a kolla deploy, some docker containers are restarted on others nodes. The administration guides describes how to add or remove a node but not this simple case. How do you proceed securely? Thanks for all, Yves

1 0

[all][tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting on 2022 Aug 11 at 1500 UTC
by Ghanshyam Mann 11 Aug '22

11 Aug '22

Hello Everyone, The technical Committee's next weekly meeting is scheduled for 2022 Aug 11, at 1500 UTC. If you would like to add topics for discussion, please add them to the below wiki page by Wednesday, Aug 10 at 2100 UTC. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting -gmann

1 1

[cinder] Bug deputy report for week of 08-10-2022
by Sofia Enriquez 10 Aug '22

10 Aug '22

This is a bug report from 08-03-2022 to 08-10-2022. Agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Low - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1984169 "RBD pool stats are reported inaccurately." Fix proposed to master. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1984000 "Infinidat Cinder driver consistency groups feature is broken." Fix proposed to master. Cheers, Sofia -- Sofía Enriquez she/her Software Engineer Red Hat PnT <https://www.redhat.com> IRC: @enriquetaso @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

1 0

[neutron][ovn] ovn-bgp-agent EVPN mode question
by Satish Patel 10 Aug '22

10 Aug '22

Folks, I am trying to set up the following lab and so far everything looks good and working but I have some doubts or questions to make sure it's really working as expected. Lab Ref: https://ltomasbo.wordpress.com/2021/06/25/openstack-networking-with-evpn/ rack-1-host-1 (controller) rack-1-host-2 (compute1 - This is hosting cr-lrp ports, inshort router) rack-2-host-1 (compute2) I have created two vms vagrant@rack-1-host-1:~$ nova list nova CLI is deprecated and will be a removed in a future release +--------------------------------------+------+--------+------------+-------------+--------------------------------------+ | ID | Name | Status | Task State | Power State | Networks | +--------------------------------------+------+--------+------------+-------------+--------------------------------------+ | aecb4f10-c46f-4551-b112-44e4dc007e88 | vm1 | ACTIVE | - | Running | private-test=10.0.0.105 | | ceae14b9-70c2-4dbc-8071-0d64d9a0ca84 | vm2 | ACTIVE | - | Running | private-test=10.0.0.86, 172.16.1.200 | +--------------------------------------+------+--------+------------+-------------+--------------------------------------+ # on rack-1-host-2 when i spun up vm2 which endup on rack-1-host-2 hence it created vrf-2001 on dummy lo-2001 interface and exposed vm2 ip address 10.0.0.86/32 96: vrf-2001: <NOARP,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65575 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 22:cc:25:b3:7b:96 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 97: br-2001: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master vrf-2001 state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 0a:c3:23:7a:8f:0c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::851:67ff:fe64:b2c3/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 98: vxlan-2001: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-2001 state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 0a:c3:23:7a:8f:0c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::8c3:23ff:fe7a:8f0c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 99: lo-2001: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master vrf-2001 state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether d6:60:da:91:2e:6d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 10.0.0.86/32 scope global lo-2001 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::d460:daff:fe91:2e6d/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever # on rack-2-host-1 when i created vm1 which endup on rack-2-host-1 but it doesn't expose the vm ip address. Is that normal behavior? When I attach a floating ip to vm2 then why does my floating ip address not get exposed in BGP? Thank you in advance

1 0

Openstack Graphical processors virtualisation
by KK CHN 10 Aug '22

10 Aug '22

1. Does Openstack support GPU virtualization ? We are running a cloud using ussuri with KVM hypervisors. Is creation of vGPUs possible? Does KVM support GPU virtualization or any limitations? 2. What are the supported GPU types? (GRID GPU or GPUs attached to physical blades ) 3. If it supports GPU attached to physical blades, will live migration of the VM be supported. Will OpenStack be able to identify the next host which has an attached GPU and perform live migration, in case of the Failure of One Blade with attached GPU with resident VM. 4. What are the virtualization options if vGPU options are not supported by a particular GPU model? Thanks in advance, Krish

4 4

[PTG] [ironic] Antelope PTG new Etherpad
by Iury Gregory 10 Aug '22

10 Aug '22

Hello everyone, We changed the etherpad link to track the topics we will discuss at the PTG, instead of https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-ptg-planing-Columbus-OH we will be using https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-antelope-ptg Feel free to add any topics =) -- *Att[]'s* *Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira * *MSc in Computer Science at UFCG* *Ironic PTL * *Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat Brazil* *Social*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/iurygregory *E-mail: iurygregory(a)gmail.com <iurygregory(a)gmail.com>*

1 0

Need help on rabbitmq
by AJ_ sunny 10 Aug '22

10 Aug '22

Hi team I am using kolla-ansible based openstack infra and getting below error in logs seems frequent rabbitmq disconnections <0.5023.16> closing AMQP connection <0.5023.16> (10.80.0.13:40356 -> 10.80.0.13:5672 - mod_wsgi:19:d3196668-57e5-46dc-8b69-78d73b5873a0): missed heartbeats from client, timeout: 60s AMQP server on 10.80.0.13:5672 is unreachable: [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer. Trying again in 1 seconds.: ConnectionResetError: [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer Is this bug or any resolution for fixing this issue? Thanks Arihant Jain

4 4

[tacker] IRC meeting on Aug 16 cancelled
by Yasufumi Ogawa 10 Aug '22

10 Aug '22

Hi team, Since many of us are going to have a vacation next week, I'll cancel the meeting on Aug 16th. Thanks, Yasufumi

1 0

Correct way to add firewall rules in tripleo | Wallaby
by Swogat Pradhan 10 Aug '22

10 Aug '22

Hi, I am trying to add a rule for zabbix in my tripleo wallaby setup on top of centos 8 stream. i followed https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/feature… but got the error message: [ERROR]: Failed, module return: {'msg': 'value of action must be one of: append, insert, got: accept', 'failed': True, 'invocation': {'module_args': {'state': 'present', 'action': 'accept', 'jump': 'ACCEPT', 'chain': 'INPUT', 'protocol': 'tcp', 'source': '172.25.161.50', 'ctstate': ['NEW'], 'ip_version': 'ipv4', 'comment': '301 allow zabbix ipv4', 'destination_port': '10050', 'table': 'filter', 'match': [], 'syn': 'ignore', 'flush': False}}, 'warnings': ["The value 10050 (type int) in a string field was converted to '10050' (type string). If this does not look like what you expect, quote the entire value to ensure it does not change."], '_ansible_parsed': True} [ERROR]: Failed, return data: {'stdout': None, 'stderr': None, 'msg': 'value of action must be one of: append, insert, got: accept', 'cmd': None, 'rc': 0, 'failed': True} 2022-07-21 01:27:33.335477 | 48d539a1-1679-1e80-25fd-000000005aa1 | TASK | Manage firewall rules 2022-07-21 01:27:33.351515 | 48d539a1-1679-1e80-25fd-000000005542 | FATAL | Manage firewall rules | overcloud-controller-0 | error={"changed": false, "cmd": null, "msg": "value of action must be one of: append, insert, got: accept", "rc": 0, "stderr": null, "stdout": null} When i tried the following link: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/15… <https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/15…> my script is running fine but rules are not updated in iptables for zabbix. Can you please suggest a correct approach to open port 10050 in tripleo? With regards, Swogat Pradhan

2 1

Security vulnerabilities in Horizon dashboard | Openstack Wallaby | Tripleo | Openstack Horizon
by Swogat Pradhan 09 Aug '22

09 Aug '22

Hi, I am setting up an openstack wallaby cloud for a client using tripleo. After setting everything up the client ran a WEB scan and found some vulnerabilities (attached snapshot for reference). Can you please guide me on how to fix these vulnerabilities in the dashboard service? With regards, Swogat pradhan

2 3

[openstack-ansible] Meeting on August 16 is cancelled
by Dmitriy Rabotyagov 09 Aug '22

09 Aug '22

Hi everyone, Since several core participants won't be able to present at the meeting it was decided to cancel the Team meeting on 16th of August 2022.

1 0

[nova] Review guide for PCI tracking for Placement patches
by Balazs Gibizer 09 Aug '22

09 Aug '22

Hi Nova, The first batch of patches are up for review for the PCI tracking for Placement feature. These mostly covers two aspects of the spec[1]: 1) renaming [pci]passthrough_whitelist to [pci]device_spec 2) pci inventory reporting to placement, excluding existing PCI allocation healing in placement This covers the first 4 sub chapters of Proposed Change chapter of the spec[1] up until "PCI alias configuration". I noted intentional deviations from the spec in the spec review [2] and I will push a follow up to the spec at some point fixing those. I tried to do it in small steps hence the long list of commits[3]: #2) pci inventory reporting to placement, excluding existing PCI allocation healing in placement 5827d56310 Stop if tracking is disable after it was enabled before a4b5788858 Support [pci]device_spec reconfiguration 10642c787a Reject devname based device_spec config b0ad05fb69 Ignore PCI devs with physical_network tag f5a34ee441 Reject mixed VF rc and trait config c60b26014f Reject PCI dependent device config 5cf7325221 Extend device_spec with resource_class and traits eff0df6a98 Basics for PCI Placement reporting #1) renaming [pci]passthrough_whitelist to [pci]device_spec adfe34080a Rename whitelist in tests ea955a0c15 Rename exception.PciConfigInvalidWhitelist to PciConfigInvalidSpec 55770e4c14 Rename [pci]passthrough_whitelist to device_spec There is a side track branching out from "adfe34080a Rename whitelist in tests" to clean up the device spec handling[4]: 514500b5a4 Move __str__ to the PciAddressSpec base class 3a6198c8fb Fix type annotation of pci.Whitelist class f70adbb613 Remove unused PF checking from get_function_by_ifname b7eef53b1d Clean up mapping input to address spec types 93bbd67101 Poison /sys access via various calls in test 467ef91a86 Remove dead code from PhysicalPciAddress 233212d30f Fix PciAddressSpec descendants to call super.__init__ ad5bd46f46 Unparent PciDeviceSpec from PciAddressSpec cef0d2de4c Extra tests for remote managed dev spec 2fa2825afb Add more test coverage for devname base dev spec adfe34080a Rename whitelist in tests This is not a mandatory part of the feature but I think they improve the code in hand and even fixing some small bugs. I will continue with adding allocation healing for existing PCI allocations. Any feedback is highly appreciated. Cheers, gibi [1] https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/zed/approved/pci-dev… [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/791047 [3] https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp/pci-device-tracking-in-placement [4] https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp/pci-device-spec-cleanup

1 2

[publiccloud-sig] A new start for Public Cloud SIG
by Tobias Rydberg 09 Aug '22

09 Aug '22

Hi everyone, In Berlin it became clear that there is a big interest in restarting the Public Cloud SIG. Thank you all for your contributions in that forum session [0] and the interest in participating in the work of this SIG. A lot of good ideas of what we should focus on was identified, with a clear focus of interoperability and standardization, to make the experience of using OpenStack as an end-user even better. Standardization of images and flavors - naming, metadata etc - being one of them, working closely with InterOp WG regarding the checks and governance of the OpenStack Powered Program another. The ultimate goal could be to reach a state where it is possible to start to federate between the public clouds, but for that to be possible on a more global scale we need to start with aligning the simple things. To kick this off, we will start with bi-weekly IRC meetings again, shape the goals kick of some work towards identified goals. Since we have an IRC channel (#openstck-publiccloud) my suggestion is that we will start there. Let's decide on suggestions for day and time for our bi-weekly meetings during the kick off meeting. Kick off meeting =========== When: Wednesday 10th of August at 1400 UTC Where: IRC in channel #openstack-publiccloud I created an etherpad for our first meeting [1], feel free to add items to the agenda or other suggestions on goals etc that you might have prior to the meeting. Hope to see at IRC in August! [0] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/berlin-summit-future-public-cloud-sig [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/publiccloud-sig-kickoff BR, Tobias Rydberg

2 2

[announcement] [debian] Debian Buster with OpenStack Rocky will receive LTS support
by Thomas Goirand 08 Aug '22

08 Aug '22

Hi! After some discussion with the folks taking care of the Debian LTS project, we decided that we will attempt to support OpenStack Rocky, running on Debian 10 (aka: Buster), for another 2 years, together with the rest of the distribution. In the past, we decided that we wouldn't do it, and that OpenStack would be part of the list of unsupported packages, because it was too difficult to maintain. However, it is my opinion that this has changed, because: - The codebase is evolving slower - I do have all the tooling to re-do a Rocky deployment if needed - There's a lot less CVE per year than it used to be (10 years ago, it was 1 every 2 weeks on average, now we have like 2 grave issue per year...). - I'm confident that if there's a grave issue, I'll be able to find help from the this wonderful community (it happened in the past...). Also, some sponsors of the Debian LTS project are actually running OpenStack Rocky on Debian. So it makes sense to help them. It is to be noted that I will not be the person doing the actual security backports, but I'll be there in case the person doing it needs help from me (for example, to do a deployment and manual regression testing). Hoping this will help OpenStack users running on Debian, Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

1 0

[all] Automatic update of Python jobs in Zuul project configuration
by Pierre Riteau 08 Aug '22

08 Aug '22

Hello, A patch submitted to python-blazarclient by yoctozepto [1] made me realise the automatic change of Python jobs from yoga to zed missed various repositories [2], mostly python clients. Is there a reason for this? Also, one can easily find projects which are using even older job templates (xena or earlier). Thanks, Pierre Riteau (priteau) [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-blazarclient/+/851903 [2] https://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=openstack-python3-yoga-jobs&i=nope&lite…

3 6

[kolla-ansible] why does not the bootstrap create the docker bridge?
by wodel youchi 08 Aug '22

08 Aug '22

Hi, The bootstrap installs docker but it does not create the docker bridge, why? Regards.

2 1

[Oslo] IRC meeting.
by Daniel Mats Niklas Bengtsson 08 Aug '22

08 Aug '22

Hi there, I'm sorry, I was on vacation and then I had personal problems. We are still in the summer period and I think there are still people on vacation, I suggest resuming meetings in September. What do you think?

1 0

[neutron] Bug Deputy Report August 01 - 07
by Elvira Garcia Ruiz 08 Aug '22

08 Aug '22

Hi, I was the bug deputy last week. Find the summary below: High: ------- - [ovn]router_interface port probability cannot be up https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1983530 Fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/851997 - l2_pop does unnecessary db fetches for incompatible network types https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1983558 Fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/852089 Medium: ----------- - [OVN] Old DNS servers are served by DHCP after dns_servers option is updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1983270 Assigned to me Low: ------- - Neutron should clean up ACLs in OVN NB DB when a remote security group is deleted https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1983600 Unassigned Kind regards! Elvira

1 0

[Cinder][NFS][Openstack-Ansible]
by Dave Hall 08 Aug '22

08 Aug '22

Hello, I seem to have gotten myself in a bit of a mess trying to set up Cinder with an NFS back-end. After working with Glance and NFS, I started on Cinder. I noticed immediately that there weren't any NFS mounts in the Cinder-API containers like there were in the Glance-API containers. Also that there were no NFS packages in the Cinder-API containers. In reading some Cinder documentation, I also got the impression that each Cinder host/container needs to have its own NFS store. Pawing through the playbooks and documentation I saw that unlike Glance, Cinder is split into two pieces - Cinder-API and Cinder-Volume. I found cinder-volume.yml.example in env.d, activated it, and created Cinder-Volume containers on my 3 infra hosts. I also created 3 separate NFS shares and changed the storage-hosts section of my openstack_user_config.yml accordingly. After this I found that while I was able to create volumes, the prep_volume part of launching an instance was failing. Digging in, I found: # openstack volume service list +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+------+---------+-------+----------------------------+ | Binary | Host | Zone | Status | State | Updated At | +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+------+---------+-------+----------------------------+ | cinder-volume | C6220-9@nfs_volume | nova | enabled | down | 2022-07-23T02:46:13.000000 | | cinder-volume | C6220-10@nfs_volume | nova | enabled | down | 2022-07-23T02:46:14.000000 | | cinder-volume | C6220-11@nfs_volume | nova | enabled | down | 2022-07-23T02:46:14.000000 | | cinder-scheduler | infra36-cinder-api-container-da8e100f | nova | enabled | up | 2022-08-06T13:29:10.000000 | | cinder-scheduler | infra38-cinder-api-container-27219f93 | nova | enabled | up | 2022-08-06T13:29:10.000000 | | cinder-scheduler | infra37-cinder-api-container-ea7f847b | nova | enabled | up | 2022-08-06T13:29:10.000000 | | cinder-volume | C6220-9@nfs_volume1 | nova | enabled | up | 2022-08-06T13:29:10.000000 | | cinder-volume | infra37-cinder-volumes-container-5b9635ad@nfs_volume | nova | enabled | down | 2022-08-04T18:32:53.000000 | | cinder-volume | infra36-cinder-volumes-container-77190057@nfs_volume1 | nova | enabled | down | 2022-08-06T13:03:03.000000 | | cinder-volume | infra38-cinder-volumes-container-a7bcfc9b@nfs_volume | nova | enabled | down | 2022-08-04T18:32:53.000000 | | cinder-volume | infra37-cinder-volumes-container-5b9635ad@nfs_volume2 | nova | enabled | down | 2022-08-06T13:03:05.000000 | | cinder-volume | C6220-10@nfs_volume2 | nova | enabled | up | 2022-08-06T13:29:10.000000 | | cinder-volume | C6220-11@nfs_volume3 | nova | enabled | up | 2022-08-06T13:29:10.000000 | | cinder-volume | infra38-cinder-volumes-container-a7bcfc9b@nfs_volume3 | nova | enabled | down | 2022-08-06T13:03:03.000000 | +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+------+---------+-------+----------------------------+ Thinking I could save this, I used containers-lxc-destroy.yml to destroy my cinder-volumes containers and deactivated cinder-volume.yml.example. Then I ran setup-hosts.yml, which has restored the cinder-volumes containers even though is_metal: false has been removed. Clearly a stronger intervention will be required. I would like to fully get rid of the cinder-volumes containers and go back to an is_metal: true scenario. I also need to get rid of the unnumbered nfs_volume referenes, which I assume are in some cinder config file somewhere. Below is a clip from my openstack_user_config.yml: storage_hosts: infra36: ip: 172.29.236.36 container_vars: cinder_backends: nfs_volume1: volume_backend_name: NFS_VOLUME1 volume_driver: cinder.volume.drivers.nfs.NfsDriver nfs_mount_options: "rsize=65535,wsize=65535,timeo=1200,actimeo=120" nfs_shares_config: /etc/cinder/nfs_shares_volume1 shares: - { ip: "172.29.244.27", share: "/NFS_VOLUME1" } infra37: ip: 172.29.236.37 container_vars: cinder_backends: nfs_volume2: volume_backend_name: NFS_VOLUME2 volume_driver: cinder.volume.drivers.nfs.NfsDriver nfs_mount_options: "rsize=65535,wsize=65535,timeo=1200,actimeo=120" nfs_shares_config: /etc/cinder/nfs_shares_volume2 shares: - { ip: "172.29.244.27", share: "/NFS_VOLUME2" } infra38: ip: 172.29.236.38 container_vars: cinder_backends: nfs_volume3: volume_backend_name: NFS_VOLUME3 volume_driver: cinder.volume.drivers.nfs.NfsDriver nfs_mount_options: "rsize=65535,wsize=65535,timeo=1200,actimeo=120" nfs_shares_config: /etc/cinder/nfs_shares_volume3 shares: - { ip: "172.29.244.27", share: "/NFS_VOLUME3" } Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. -Dave -- Dave Hall Binghamton University kdhall(a)binghamton.edu

4 8

Guide for Openstack installation with HA, OVN ?
by 박경원 07 Aug '22

07 Aug '22

3 2

[release] Release countdown for week R-8, Aug 08 - 12
by Előd Illés 06 Aug '22

06 Aug '22

General Information ------------------- The following cycle-with-intermediary deliverables have not done any intermediary release yet during this cycle: Ironic: * bifrost * ironic-prometheus-exporter * ironic-python-agent-builder * ironic-ui * networking-baremetal * networking-generic-switch OpenStackSDK: * python-openstackclient Swift: * swift Since these deliverables are traditionally released after our warning, we did not propose to change the release model to cycle-with-rc for them this time. Please let us know if any of the above project is considering the release model change anyway and we propose those patches. Otherwise immediately release an intermediary release, or acknowledge that a release needs to be done before RC1! We also published a proposed release schedule for the upcoming Antelope cycle. Please check out the separate thread: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-July/029767.ht… Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- Non-client library freeze: August 26th, 2022 (R-6 week) Client library freeze: September 1st, 2022 (R-5 week) Zed-3 milestone: September 1st, 2022 (R-5 week) Előd Illés irc: elodilles

1 0

[charms] General release of charmhub OpenStack xena/stable, ceph pacific/stable, OVN 21.09/stable tracks for Ubuntu 20.04 (focal) LTS
by Alex Kavanagh 06 Aug '22

06 Aug '22

Hi All The title may seem a bit odd because surely yoga is the current release, and zed is the current cycle? This is true, so a little explanation is in order. As the charm-guide [1] explains, in the previous cycle, the OpenStack, and supporting, charms moved from a single stable charm (for each component) that supported multiple releases, to a charm+track that targets a specific release [2]. The current release for the OpenStack charms is 'yoga' and thus there is a yoga/stable track. For a full explanation, please see [1]. Today, as part of our ongoing charmhub stable migration work this cycle, we have (re)released the 21.10 charms (that supported queens -> xena) as "xena" charms for OpenStack, "pacific" charms for Ceph, and "21.09" charms for OVN. The xena, pacific and 21.09-OVN channel charms have the same features as the existing 21.10 charms, include bug-fixes and relevant backports since the 21.10 charms were released, and have been re-tested and verified as a set prior to being released to the xena/stable channel. The full list of charms for a "Xena" OpenStack system, including ceph, OVN, mysql8, hacluster, rabbitmq-server, vault and others can be seen in the docs at [3]. The xena/pacific/21.09 charms have been designed to be upgradable from the 21.10 charms if you are running a xena OpenStack, but please consult the docs [4] about how to go about upgrading charms. The charms also are able to perform the OpenStack upgrade from wallaby -> xena, and again please consult the docs [5] for upgrading OpenStack. Our next stable maintenance release will be wallaby/pacific/20.12 (ovn), so please keep an eye out on the mailing lists. Thanks! [1] https://docs.openstack.org/charm-guide/latest/project/charm-delivery.html [2] https://juju.is/docs/olm/deploy-a-charm-from-charmhub#heading--specify-a-ch… [3] https://docs.openstack.org/charm-guide/latest/project/charm-delivery.html#c… [4] https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/charm-deployment-guide/late… [5] https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/charm-deployment-guide/late… -- Alex Kavanagh - Software Engineer OpenStack Engineering - Data Centre Development - Canonical Ltd

1 0

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary 2022 Aug 5: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 05 Aug '22

05 Aug '22

Hello Everyone, Here is this week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. TC Meetings: ============ * We had this week's meeting on Aug 4. Most of the topics I am summarizing in this email. This was a video call and recordings are available @https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CFrDKJsnEY * Next TC weekly meeting will be on Aug 11 Thursday at 15:00 UTC, feel free to add the topic on the agenda[1] by Aug 10. 2. What we completed this week: ========================= * Added charmed k8s operators to OpenStack Charms[2] 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for Zed cycle ------------------------------ * Zed tracker etherpad includes the TC working items[3], Two are completed and others items are in-progress. Open Reviews ----------------- * Three open reviews for ongoing activities[4]. 2023.1 cycle Technical Election (TC + PTL) planning ------------------------------------------------------------- As we are in the R-9 week, its time to plan for the 2023.1 cycle election. As first step, we have volunteer to help executing this election. In TC meeting, Amy, Knikolla, and Slaweq volunteer to help and Ian might be available any ways. If you would like to get involved in the elections help, please let us know in #openstack-tc IRC channel. 2023.1 cycle TC PTG planning ------------------------------------ In TC meeting, we were gathering the data on who all will be traveling to in-person PTG or we should consider virtual PTG. But as you might have seen the announcement today, coming PTG will be 100% virtual[5]. 2021 User Survey TC Question Analysis ----------------------------------------------- No update on this. The survey summary is up for review[6]. Feel free to check and provide feedback. Zed cycle Leaderless projects ---------------------------------- Dale Smith volunteer to be PTL for Adjutant project [7] Fixing Zuul config error ---------------------------- Requesting projects with zuul config error to look into those and fix them which should not take much time[8][9]. Project updates ------------------- * Retire openstack-helm-addons[10] 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[11]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15 UTC [12] 3. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/849997 [3] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker [4] https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+status:open [5] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-August/029879.… [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/836888 [7] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/849606 [8] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zuul-config-error-openstack [9] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-May/028603.html [10] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/849997 [11] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [12] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting -gmann

1 0

Fwd: October PTG Update
by Kendall Nelson 05 Aug '22

05 Aug '22

Hello Everyone, I wanted to provide an update on the October Project Teams Gathering (PTG). After discussing with community members and prospective sponsors, we have made the decision to pivot the event to 100% virtual to be as inclusive as possible. I know that this is not the ideal outcome and there are a lot of factors contributing to this decision, but we think it’s the best decision for the global community at this time. We are continuing to receive feedback on the value and importance of in-person PTGs; we just need to wait for other factors to be less of an obstacle If you have already registered, you should have been contacted for a full refund. We are going to use the same week for a virtual PTG and it will be free to attend, just like the previous ones. The registration is already live [1]. If you have any questions or feedback on this decision, please let us know. We will continue to monitor feedback as we make plans for a 2023 PTG. Thank you, Kendall (diablo_rojo) [1] https://openinfra-ptg.eventbrite.com

1 0

[manila] Feature Proposal Freeze in effect
by Carlos Silva 05 Aug '22

05 Aug '22

Greetings, Zorillas and interested stackers! As we defined in the release schedule, this week is the Manila Feature Proposal Freeze [1]. It means that all featureful changes should be already proposed and substantially completed with unit, functional and integration tests by EOW. If you have not managed to submit your featureful changes to gerrit yet, and would like to request an exception, please let me know by responding to this email thread. In case your exception is granted, we can get you some extra time. [1] https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html#z-manila-fpfreeze Thank you! carloss

1 0

[openstack] how to speed up live migration?
by Ignazio Cassano 05 Aug '22

05 Aug '22

Hello All, I am looking for a solution to speed up live migration. Instances where ram is used heavily like java application servers, live migration take a long time (more than 20 minutes for 8GB ram instance) and converge mode is already set to True in nova.conf. I also tried with post_copy but it does not change. After the first live migration (very solow) if I try to migrate again it is very fast. I presume the first migration is slow because memory fragmentation when an instance is running on the same compute node for a long time. I am looking for a solution considering the on my computing node I can have a little ram overcommit. Any case I am increasing the number of compute nodes to reduce it. Thanks Ignazio

6 21

[tripleo] gate blocker - tripleo-ci-centos-9-content-provider-wallaby
by Ananya Banerjee 05 Aug '22

05 Aug '22

Hi, We have a failure in tripleo-ci-centos-9-content-provider-wallaby which is blocking the gate. We are reverting [1] to clear the gate. Related Bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1983585 [1] https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridg… Thanks, Ananya -- Ananya Banerjee, RHCSA, RHCE-OSP Software Engineer Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> anbanerj(a)redhat.com M: +491784949931 IM: frenzy_friday @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com/>

2 1

Large files multipart upload fails - OpenStack Object Storage (swift)
by Komarov, Aleksandr 05 Aug '22

05 Aug '22

Hi to all! Please suggest how to fix the situation. When uploading files larger than 100GB, at the stage of multipart-manifest validation, we get 404 error for some segments that were previously uploaded successfully. As a result, the client receives a 400 response. Uploading a large file is not possible. Logs: Aug 1 13:18:30 swift01-object01 object-server: IP - - [01/Aug/2022:13:18:30 +0000] "PUT /mpathc/12130/AUTH_5affc785b3454cddb2d1f69ce62b4441/bucket/.file-segments/150.file/000 00032" 201 - "PUT http://domain-name/v1/AUTH_5affc785b3454cddb2d1f69ce62b4441/bucket/.file-se…" "tx30e82374b98845bab6883-0062e7d225" "proxy-server 8367" 128.7641 "-" 21577 0 Aug 1 13:18:30 swift01-object01 container-server: IP - - [01/Aug/2022:13:18:30 +0000] "PUT /mpathb/952/AUTH_5affc785b3454cddb2d1f69ce62b4441/bucket/.file-segments/150.file/00 000032" 201 - "PUT http://domain-name/mpathe/12130/AUTH_5affc785b3454cddb2d1f69ce62b4441/bucke…" "tx30e82374b98845bab6883-0062 e7d225" "object-server 24710" 0.0005 "-" 13211 0 Aug 1 14:01:46 swift01-object01 object-server: IP - - [01/Aug/2022:14:01:46 +0000] "HEAD /mpathc/12130/AUTH_5affc785b3454cddb2d1f69ce62b4441/bucket/.file-segments/150.file/00000032" 404 - "HEAD http://domain-name/v1/AUTH_5affc785b3454cddb2d1f69ce62b4441/bucket/.file-se…" "txf09676de38964ca299b77-0062e7dcc8" "proxy-server 8367" 0.0003 "-" 21579 0 At the same time, some segments successfully found. With files less than 50GB everything is fine.

2 2

[neutron] CI meeting on Aug 9 cancelled
by Slawek Kaplonski 05 Aug '22

05 Aug '22

Hi, I will be on PTO next week and on last CI meeting we decided to cancel CI meeting on Tuesday 9th of August. Have a great week and see You on the meeting on August 16th. -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

1 0

How do I deploy OpenStack open source cloud software on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0?
by Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming 05 Aug '22

05 Aug '22

Subject: How do I deploy OpenStack open source cloud software on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0? Good day from Singapore, How do I deploy OpenStack open source cloud software on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0? I have just downloaded RHEL 9.0 ISO using RHEL Free Developer Subscription and installed it as a virtual machine inside Oracle VM VirtualBox. Windows 10 on my laptop is the host. Alternatively, can I deploy Red Hat OpenStack Platform in a Virtual Private Server (VPS)? I can make another order for a VPS just for this purpose. I already have 2 VPS servers just for deploying Virtualmin/Webmin web hosting control panel. If you can give me links to excellent and well-written guides and tutorials, it would be most useful. I want to try out open source software developed by NASA. Also, I have deployed Nextcloud previously. Now I want to try out OpenStack. Thank you. Regards, Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming Targeted Individual in Singapore 5 Aug 2022 Friday Blogs: https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.com https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com

2 2

[glance] Error in store configuration. Adding images to store is disabled.
by Dave Hall 05 Aug '22

05 Aug '22

Hello, (Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. I've been chasing this for 2 weeks now...) I posted the other day that I had solved this issue, but now it's back. The primary glance-api error message is: Error in store configuration. Adding images to store is disabled. So why is my store disabled? Is there some command or config line that controls this? Shouldn't the store be enabled by default? The relevant stanza in my openstack-user-config.yml is image_hosts: # infra38: # ip: 172.29.236.38 # container_vars: # limit_container_types: glance # glance_remote_client: # - what: "172.29.244.27:/images" # where: "/var/lib/glance/images" # type: "nfs" # options: "_netdev,vers=3,proto=tcp,sec=sys" infra38: ip: 172.29.236.38 container_vars: glance_default_store: file glance_nfs_local_directory: "images" glance_nfs_client: - server: "172.29.244.27" remote_path: "/images" local_path: "/var/lib/glance/images" type: "nfs" options: "_netdev,vers=3,proto=tcp,sec=sys,noauto,user" config_overrides: "{}" The stanza that's commented out produced the same result. My user_variables.yaml does not have any lines pertaining to glance. Also, I've removed the stanzas for the other 2 infra hosts. The glance-api.conf file from the container is: [DEFAULT] # Disable stderr logging use_stderr = False debug = False use_journal = True fatal_deprecations = False bind_host = 172.29.238.205 bind_port = 9292 http_keepalive = True digest_algorithm = sha256 backlog = 4096 workers = 16 cinder_catalog_info = volumev3:cinderv3:internalURL enable_v2_api = True transport_url = rabbit:// glance:9e7f205ef620983a542b4f915420e50d33f774@172.29.238.84:5671, glance:9e7f205ef620983a542b4f915420e50d33f774@172.29.238.174:5671, glance:9e7f205ef620983a542b4f915420e50d33f774@172.29.239.33:5671//glance?ssl=1&ssl_version=TLSv1_2&ssl_ca_file= scrub_time = 43200 image_cache_dir = /var/lib/glance/cache/ image_cache_stall_time = 86400 image_cache_max_size = 10737418240 # defaults to true if RBD is used as default store show_image_direct_url = False show_multiple_locations = True enabled_backends = file:file,http:http,cinder:cinder [task] task_executor = taskflow [database] connection = mysql+pymysql:// glance:e6dd6f2ca946c9e6f72bb864387a@172.29.236.36/glance?charset=utf8&ssl_verify_cert=true max_overflow = 50 max_pool_size = 5 pool_timeout = 30 connection_recycle_time = 600 [keystone_authtoken] insecure = False auth_type = password auth_url = http://172.29.236.36:5000/v3 www_authenticate_uri = http://172.29.236.36:5000 project_domain_id = default user_domain_id = default project_name = service username = glance password = c96a36e76208ee26851c78670d34dcaff1c870 region_name = RegionOne service_token_roles_required = False service_token_roles = service service_type = image memcached_servers = 172.29.239.168:11211,172.29.239.242:11211, 172.29.236.80:11211 token_cache_time = 300 # if your memcached server is shared, use these settings to avoid cache poisoning memcache_security_strategy = ENCRYPT memcache_secret_key = 0b65b4b99155a6430e923fc9c24d9674 [oslo_policy] policy_file = policy.yaml policy_default_rule = default policy_dirs = policy.d [oslo_messaging_notifications] topics = notifications driver = messagingv2 transport_url = rabbit:// glance:9e7f205ef620983a542b4f915420e50d33f774@172.29.238.84:5671, glance:9e7f205ef620983a542b4f915420e50d33f774@172.29.238.174:5671, glance:9e7f205ef620983a542b4f915420e50d33f774@172.29.239.33:5671//glance?ssl=1&ssl_version=TLSv1_2&ssl_ca_file= [paste_deploy] flavor = keystone+cachemanagement [glance_store] default_backend = file [file] filesystem_store_datadir = /var/lib/glance/images/ [profiler] enabled = False [oslo_middleware] enable_proxy_headers_parsing = True [cors] allow_headers = origin,content-md5,x-image-meta-checksum,x-storage-token,accept-encoding,x-auth-token,x-identity-status,x-roles,x-service-catalog,x-user-id,x-tenant-id,x-openstack-request-id allow_methods = GET,POST,PUT,PATCH,DELETE allowed_origin = https://osa-portal.cs.binghamton.edu I'd be glad to run glance-api in the foreground with debug (in the container, or course), but it's not obvious from the .service file how to do that. I'd be glad to read source code, but a pointer or two would be handy. If NFS (or Hao's GPFS) just aren't supported anymore please tell me. Thanks. -Dave -- Dave Hall Binghamton University kdhall(a)binghamton.edu

2 2

[all] Dynamic Zuul results table in Gerrit 3
by Radosław Piliszek 04 Aug '22

04 Aug '22

Hello Fellow OpenStack and OpenDev Folks! TL;DR click on [3] and enjoy. I am starting this thread to not hijack the discussion happening on [1]. First of all, I would like to thank gibi (Balazs Gibizer) for hacking a way to get the place to render the table in the first place (pun intended). I have been a long-time-now user of [2]. I have improved and customised it for myself but never really got to share back the changes I made. The new Gerrit obviously broke the whole script so it was of no use to share at that particular state. However, inspired by gibi's work, I decided to finally sit down and fix it to work with Gerrit 3 and here it comes: [3]. Works well on Chrome with Tampermonkey. Not tested others. I hope you will enjoy this little helper (I do). I know the script looks super fugly but it generally boils down to a mix of styles of 3 people and Gerrit having funky UI rendering. Finally, I'd also like to thank hrw (Marcin Juszkiewicz) for linking me to the original Michel's script in 2019. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/019051… [2] https://opendev.org/x/coats/src/commit/444c95738677593dcfed0cfd9667d4c4f0d5… [3] https://gist.github.com/yoctozepto/7ea1271c299d143388b7c1b1802ee75e Kind regards, -yoctozepto

5 7

[Glance] Weekly Meeting Cancelled
by Pranali Deore 04 Aug '22

04 Aug '22

Hello, Since most of the team members will not be around today, so cancelling today's glance weekly meeting. Thanks & Regards, Pranali

1 0

[all][tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting on 2022 Aug 4 at 1500 UTC
by Ghanshyam Mann 04 Aug '22

04 Aug '22

Hello Everyone, Below is the agenda for Today TC meeting schedule at 1500 UTC. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting == Agenda for Today's TC meeting == * Roll call * Follow up on past action items * Gate health check ** Bare 'recheck' state *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary * 2023.1 cycle PTG Planning * 2023.1 cycle Technical Election planning * RBAC feedback in ops meetup ** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/rbac-zed-ptg#L171 ** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/847418 * Open Reviews ** https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open -gmann

1 0

resize or migrate problem
by fereshteh loghmani 03 Aug '22

03 Aug '22

hello I use OpenStack and I create some VMs in different compute in one region. when I resize the VM. if the compute doesn't have enough space, automatically the vm will be migrated to another compute. but my problem is here that when it migrated, the _base file doesn't migrate and remains in the first compute that it doesn't have enough space. because of this, the VM appears with an error status in OpenStack. if I move the _base from first compute to final compute and reboot the server this problem has been solved. so i need to not transfer _base manually and if it migrated to another compute the disk and _base transfer with each other. could you please help me to solve this problem? thanks in advance

2 3

[cinder] Bug deputy report for week of 08-03-2022
by Sofia Enriquez 03 Aug '22

03 Aug '22

This is a bug report from 07-27-2022 to 08-03-2022. Agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Low - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1983237 "Cannot retype volume of lvm to volume of fujitsu." Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1983287 "Infinidat Cinder driver fails to backup attached volume." Fix proposed to master. Cheers, Sofia -- Sofía Enriquez she/her Software Engineer Red Hat PnT <https://www.redhat.com> IRC: @enriquetaso @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

1 0

[security-sig] Any interest in getting together at the PTG?
by Jeremy Stanley 03 Aug '22

03 Aug '22

I was going to bring this up during the monthly meeting, but since I'll be unavailable the next best solution is to raise it here... Are any of the Security SIG participants planning or at least hoping to be in Columbus for the PTG this October? And if so, is there any interest in carving out some spacetime in the schedule for security discussions? We still have another week to decide, but I'm happy to put in a request for us if anyone wants that. -- Jeremy Stanley

2 1

Reminder! PTG October 2022 Team Signup Deadline
by Kendall Nelson 03 Aug '22

03 Aug '22

Hello Everyone, Don't forget to sign your team up for the next Project Teams Gathering (PTG), which will be held in Columbus, OH from Monday, October 17 to Thursday, October 20th, 2022! If you haven't already done so and your team is interested in participating, please complete the survey[1] by August 12th, 2022 at 7:00 UTC. Then make sure to register[2] for the PTG before prices go up on August 15th! Also, please book in the official hotel block for a discounted rate[3]. Booking in the PTG hotel block helps us keep costs low for all attendees, so please encourage your teams to book here. Thanks! -Kendall (diablo_rojo) [1] Team Survey: https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/oct2022_ptg_team_signup [2] PTG Registration: https://openinfra-ptg.eventbrite.com [3] Hotel Block: https://www.hyatt.com/en-US/group-booking/CMHRC/G-L0RT

1 0