- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

Attach Nvidia Jetson as compute node to openstack (aarch64)
by Pavlos Basaras 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

Hello everyone, I am relatively new to the community, thanks in advance for your time and help. I have an openstack cluster ready, working with several compute nodes based on x86 architecture. My current installation is based on Ussuri. I have recently acquired a couple of nvidia Jetson devices ( https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/autonomous-machines/embedded-systems/jetson-ag…) which I want to connect to the cluster. The arm cpu model name is ARMv8 Processor rev 0 (v8l). CPU flags on the arm architecture are different and hence egrep -c '(vmx|svm)' /proc/cpuinfo is empty to the best of my knowledge. However, i re-build the custom linux kernel (i.e, Tegra) of the Jetson device, enabling the KVM module. So once i used: *sudo kvm-ok* INFO: /dev/kvm exists KVM acceleration can be used *dmesg | grep -i kvm* [ 1.372478] kvm [1]: 16-bit VMID [ 1.372489] kvm [1]: IDMAP page: 80fa1000 [ 1.372498] kvm [1]: HYP VA range: 4000000000:7fffffffff [ 1.374185] kvm [1]: Hyp mode initialized successfully [ 1.374299] kvm [1]: vgic-v2@3884000 [ 1.374763] kvm [1]: vgic interrupt IRQ1 [ 1.374790] kvm [1]: virtual timer IRQ4 *dmesg | grep -i 'CPU features'* [ 0.687366] CPU features: detected feature: Privileged Access Never [ 0.687372] CPU features: detected feature: LSE atomic instructions [ 0.687378] CPU features: detected feature: User Access Override [ 0.687385] CPU features: detected feature: 32-bit EL0 Support Does this suffice to say that I can use KVM with libvirt for the nova openstack? The version of libvirt is 6.0.0. >From the nova logs i see the following with *virt_type = qemu* WARNING nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-] The libvirt driver is not tested on qemu/aarch64 by the OpenStack project and thus its quality can not be ensured. For more information, see: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/support-matrix.html And as it detects the aarch64 device: CPU mode "host-passthrough" was chosen If i try to launch an instance i get the following error with qemu libvirt.libvirtError: unsupported configuration: CPU mode 'host-passthrough' for aarch64 qemu domain on aarch64 host is not supported by hypervisor where as i i use *virt_type= kvm* the error after trying to launch an instance is libvirt.libvirtError: unsupported configuration: Emulator '/usr/bin/qemu-system-aarch64' does not support virt type 'kvm' Any advice on how to proceed? all the best Pavlos.

1 0

[cinder] Bug deputy report for week of 11-03-2021
by Sofia Enriquez 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

This is a bug report from 10-27-2021-15-09 to 11-03-2021. Agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Medium - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1949313 'Cinder backup tries to restore to the wrong host'. Assigned to Sam Morrison. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1949189 'NfsDriver' object has no attribute 'manage_existing_get_size'. Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1946483 'Error when deleting encrypted volume backup from another project'. Assigned to Pavlo Shchelokovskyy. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1948962 'Quotas: Some operations fail with a 255 volume type name'. Assigned to Gorka. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1949061 '[Storwize] Retype of a non-rep mirror volume to mirror- volume-type with different mirror_pool is failing'. Assigned to Mounika Sreeram. Low - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1798589 'No available space check for image_conversion_dir in cinder-volume on upload-to-image'. Unassigned. Cheers -- Sofía Enriquez she/her Software Engineer Red Hat PnT <https://www.redhat.com> IRC: @enriquetaso @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

1 0

[monasca][kolla-ansible] HTTPUnprocessableEntity: Dimension value must be 255 characters or less
by Adam Tomas 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

Hi, in my test deployment I get following error messages for each metric at each metric collection (every 60s in my case). Of course whole URL (i.e. /v2.0/metrics/statistics?name=transfer.region2.size&merge_metrics=True&dimensions=project_id%3Afcfaxxxxx&start_time=2021-10-31+02%3A55%3A00%2B02%3A00&end_time=2021-10-31+02%3A00%3A00%2B01%3A00&period=-3300&statistics=avg&group_by=project_id&group_by=resource_id) is longer than 255 characters, but shouldn’t this URL be processed in smaller chunks? As I see the validation is done by monasca_api, so in case it fails no data is processed by monasca_log_transformer, right? Limiting metric name lenght won’t change this situation (in this example metric name is 22 characters long, while the whole URL is 285 characters long, so 285-22 is still > 255). How can I avoid this error? Best regards Adam Tomas 2021-11-02 14:19:44.935 693 ERROR monasca_api.v2.common.bulk_processor [req-a251xxxx 60bexxxx 27bexxxxx - default default] Log transformation failed, rejecting log: monasca_api.api.core.log.exceptions.HTTPUnprocessableEntity: Dimension value /v2.0/metrics/statistics?name=transfer.region2.size&merge_metrics=True&dimensions=project_id%3Afcfaxxxxx&start_time=2021-10-31+02%3A55%3A00%2B02%3A00&end_time=2021-10-31+02%3A00%3A00%2B01%3A00&period=-3300&statistics=avg&group_by=project_id&group_by=resource_id must be 255 characters or less 2021-11-02 14:19:44.936 693 ERROR monasca_api.v2.common.bulk_processor [req-a251xxxx 60bexxxx 27bexxxx - default default] Dimension value /v2.0/metrics/statistics?name=transfer.region2.size&merge_metrics=True&dimensions=project_id%3Afcfaxxx&start_time=2021-10-31+02%3A55%3A00%2B02%3A00&end_time=2021-10-31+02%3A00%3A00%2B01%3A00&period=-3300&statistics=avg&group_by=project_id&group_by=resource_id must be 255 characters or less: monasca_api.api.core.log.exceptions.HTTPUnprocessableEntity: Dimension value /v2.0/metrics/statistics?name=transfer.region2.size&merge_metrics=True&dimensions=project_id%3Afcfaxxxx&start_time=2021-10-31+02%3A55%3A00%2B02%3A00&end_time=2021-10-31+02%3A00%3A00%2B01%3A00&period=-3300&statistics=avg&group_by=project_id&group_by=resource_id must be 255 characters or less 2021-11-02 14:19:44.936 693 ERROR monasca_api.v2.common.bulk_processor Traceback (most recent call last): 2021-11-02 14:19:44.936 693 ERROR monasca_api.v2.common.bulk_processor File "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.8/site-packages/monasca_api/v2/common/bulk_processor.py", line 81, in _transform_message 2021-11-02 14:19:44.936 693 ERROR monasca_api.v2.common.bulk_processor dimensions=self._get_dimensions(log_element, 2021-11-02 14:19:44.936 693 ERROR monasca_api.v2.common.bulk_processor File "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.8/site-packages/monasca_api/v2/common/bulk_processor.py", line 129, in _get_dimensions 2021-11-02 14:19:44.936 693 ERROR monasca_api.v2.common.bulk_processor validation.validate_dimensions(local_dims) 2021-11-02 14:19:44.936 693 ERROR monasca_api.v2.common.bulk_processor File "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.8/site-packages/monasca_api/api/core/log/validation.py", line 138, in validate_dimensions 2021-11-02 14:19:44.936 693 ERROR monasca_api.v2.common.bulk_processor _validate_dimension_value(dim_value) 2021-11-02 14:19:44.936 693 ERROR monasca_api.v2.common.bulk_processor File "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.8/site-packages/monasca_api/api/core/log/validation.py", line 114, in _validate_dimension_value 2021-11-02 14:19:44.936 693 ERROR monasca_api.v2.common.bulk_processor raise exceptions.HTTPUnprocessableEntity( 2021-11-02 14:19:44.936 693 ERROR monasca_api.v2.common.bulk_processor monasca_api.api.core.log.exceptions.HTTPUnprocessableEntity: Dimension value /v2.0/metrics/statistics?name=transfer.region2.size&merge_metrics=True&dimensions=project_id%3Afcfaxxxx&start_time=2021-10-31+02%3A55%3A00%2B02%3A00&end_time=2021-10-31+02%3A00%3A00%2B01%3A00&period=-3300&statistics=avg&group_by=project_id&group_by=resource_id must be 255 characters or less 2021-11-02 14:19:44.936 693 ERROR monasca_api.v2.common.bulk_processor

1 1

[neutron][ovs] Different Cookie with Remote Security group
by Mohan Kumar 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

Team, I've created a security group with a remote security group attached to it. openstack security group rule create --ethertype=IPv4 --protocol tcp > --remote-group server-grp --ingress --dst-port=22 application-grp when I create VM with server-grp , I can see two cookies in br-int ovs bridge, one with default cookie and another new cookie with conjunction flows, is it expected behavior? ubuntu@req-generic-65-d012-mn:~$ sudo ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int | awk '{print $1}' | sort -n | uniq cookie=0x12b7adbe73614620, cookie=0x207d02d6bbcf499e, NXST_FLOW ubuntu@req-generic-65-d012-mn:~$ sudo ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int | grep "0x207d02d6bbcf499e" cookie=0x207d02d6bbcf499e, duration=335.421s, table=82, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=335, priority=70,ct_state=+est-rel-rpl,ipv6,reg6=0x1,ipv6_src=fdd8:a3ce:31ae:0:f816:3eff:fe8a:f751 actions=conjunction(8,1/2) cookie=0x207d02d6bbcf499e, duration=335.420s, table=82, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=335, priority=70,ct_state=+new-est,ipv6,reg6=0x1,ipv6_src=fdd8:a3ce:31ae:0:f816:3eff:fe8a:f751 actions=conjunction(9,1/2) cookie=0x207d02d6bbcf499e, duration=335.420s, table=82, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=335, priority=70,ct_state=+est-rel-rpl,ip,reg6=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.38 actions=conjunction(16,1/2) cookie=0x207d02d6bbcf499e, duration=335.420s, table=82, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=335, priority=70,ct_state=+new-est,ip,reg6=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.38 actions=conjunction(17,1/2)

2 2

[Openstack-victoria] [Openstack-queens] migration of VM from openstack queens to victoria
by Swogat Pradhan 02 Nov '21

02 Nov '21

Hi, I have 2 openstack setups Setup1. Openstack queens + ceph nautilaus Setup2. Openstack victoria + ceph octopus So, I am trying to migrate some VM's (windows and linux) from Setup1 to Setup2. For migrating the VM's i am using rbd export on setup1 and then rbd import on setup2. I have successfully migrated 21 VM's. i am now facing an issue in the 22nd vm which, after migrating the VM the vm is stuck in the windows logo screen and not moving forward, and i can't seem to understand how to approach it. Attached the instance.xml files of both queens and victoria setup's of the same VM. With regards, Swogat pradhan

2 3

Accessing Openstack using v3 API
by open infra 02 Nov '21

02 Nov '21

Hi, I was trying to use the openstack environment using the v3 client API as mentioned in [2] documentation but ended up with an error as mentioned in [1]. I can access the same environment v3 API using curl. Am I missing something? [1] https://paste.opendev.org/show/810336/ [2] https://docs.openstack.org/python-keystoneclient/latest/using-api-v3.html Regards, Danishka

2 2

[neutron][ovn] Stateless Security Group
by Ammad Syed 02 Nov '21

02 Nov '21

Hi, I have upgraded my lab to latest xena release and ovn 21.09 and ovs 2.16. I am trying to create stateless security group. But its getting failed with below error message. # openstack security group create --stateless sec02-stateless Error while executing command: BadRequestException: 400, Unrecognized attribute(s) 'stateful' I see below logs in neutron server logs. 2021-11-02 12:47:41.921 1346 DEBUG neutron.wsgi [-] (1346) accepted ('172.16.40.45', 41272) server /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/eventlet/wsgi.py:992 2021-11-02 12:47:42.166 1346 DEBUG neutron.api.v2.base [req-b6a37fff-090f-4754-9df7-6e4314ed9481 19844bf62a7b498eb443508ef150e9b8 98687873a146418eaeeb54a01693669f - default default] Request body: {'security_group': {'name': 'sec02-stateless', 'stateful': False, 'description': 'sec02-stateless'}} prepare_request_body /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/neutron/api/v2/base.py:729 2021-11-02 12:47:42.167 1346 WARNING neutron.api.v2.base [req-b6a37fff-090f-4754-9df7-6e4314ed9481 19844bf62a7b498eb443508ef150e9b8 98687873a146418eaeeb54a01693669f - default default] An exception happened while processing the request body. The exception message is [Unrecognized attribute(s) 'stateful'].: webob.exc.HTTPBadRequest: Unrecognized attribute(s) 'stateful' 2021-11-02 12:47:42.167 1346 INFO neutron.api.v2.resource [req-b6a37fff-090f-4754-9df7-6e4314ed9481 19844bf62a7b498eb443508ef150e9b8 98687873a146418eaeeb54a01693669f - default default] create failed (client error): Unrecognized attribute(s) 'stateful' 2021-11-02 12:47:42.168 1346 INFO neutron.wsgi [req-b6a37fff-090f-4754-9df7-6e4314ed9481 19844bf62a7b498eb443508ef150e9b8 98687873a146418eaeeb54a01693669f - default default] 172.16.40.45 "POST /v2.0/security-groups HTTP/1.1" status: 400 len: 317 time: 0.2455938 Any advice on how to fix it ? Ammad

3 10

[neutron] CI meeting - Tuesday 02.11.2021
by Slawek Kaplonski 02 Nov '21

02 Nov '21

Hi, As we discussed during the PTG and in the last week's CI meeting, this week's meeting will be a video call. Please join https://meetpad.opendev.org/neutron-ci-meetings at 300pm UTC if You are interested in the Neutron CI. We will also keep meeting opened in the #openstack-neutron irc channel in case if anyone would like to participate that way. Agenda for the meeting is at https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/neutron-ci-meetings -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

1 0

[neutron] Bug Deputy Report Oct 25 - 31
by Oleg Bondarev 02 Nov '21

02 Nov '21

Hi everyone, Please find Bug Deputy report for the week Oct 25 - 31st below. 1 Critical bug in stable/train already in progress; 1 High bug looks for an assignee. Several OVN bug needs some triage from OVN folks + assignees. Critical - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1948804 - [stable/train] neutron-tempest-plugin scenario jobs fail "sudo: guestmount: command not found" o In Progress: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/815518 o Assigned to bcafarel High - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1948832 - "_disable_ipv6_addressing_on_interface" can't find the interface o Confirmed o Unassigned Medium - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1948676 - rpc response timeout for agent report_state is not possible Edit o Fix released: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/815310 o Fixed by Tobias Urdin - https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948642 - Configuration of the ovs controller by neutron-ovs-agent isn't idempotent Edit o In progress: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/815255 o Assigned to slaweq - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1948891 - [ovn] Using ovsdb-client for MAC_Binding could theoretically block indefinitely o Confirmed o Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1949059 - ovn-octavia-provider: incorrect router association in NB when network is linked to more than 1 router o Confirmed o Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1949081 - [OVN] check_for_mcast_flood_reports maintenance task not accounting for localnet "mcast_flood" changes o Confirmed o Assigned to lucasgomes Undecided - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1949097 - Cloud-Init cannot contact Meta-Data-Service on Xena with OVN o New o Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1949202 - ovn-controllers are listed as agents but cannot be disabled o New o Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1949230 - OVN Octavia provider driver should implement allowed_cidrs to enforce security groups on LB ports o New o Unassigned Invalid - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1948656 - toggling explicitly_egress_direct from true to false does not clean flows Thanks, Oleg --- Advanced Software Technology Lab Huawei

1 0

[horizon] Skip tomorrow Weekly IRC Meeting
by vishal manchanda 01 Nov '21

01 Nov '21

Hi all, As discussed, during the last weekly meeting[1], there will be no horizon weekly meeting tomorrow. See you next week! Thanks & regards, Vishal Manchanda [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/horizon/2021/horizon.2021-10-27-15.00…

1 0

[tacker][ptg] Yoga PTG summary
by yasufum 01 Nov '21

01 Nov '21

Hi everyone, Thank you for participating in the Yoga PTG sessions. We discussed 17 items totally, including 13 specs, and agreed all to implement the proposed features. We also decided to set the spec freeze on 31th Dec. The etherpad of our PTG is at https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-yoga-ptg Here is a summary of the PTG sessions. *Day 1 1. Introduce for Tacker installer * To reduce uinteresting steps of setting up tacker, we introduce a dedicated installer for developers. * For beginners, we should minimize difficulties of deploying and make them focusing on their usecases. 2. Prometheus monitoring and AutoHeal support for Kubernetes Cluster VNF via FM Interface * Add fault management interface support applied with ETSI SOL003 standards including polling mode and notify mode. * Polling mode responds to resources that is named "Alarms" and "Individual alarm". On the other hand, notify mode responds to resources that is named "Subscriptions" and "Notification endpoint" 3. Support VNF update operations reflecting changes to VNF instances using MgmtDriver * Add update APIs for container VNF instances by using ConfigMap and Secret of k8s. 4. Support CentOS stream * Revise our current incomplete CentOS support for the latest 'stream'. * We will provide some functional tests for the update, but non-voting for a while. 5. Add VNF Package sample for practical use cases * Provide more practical examples of usecase of tacker for users because current usecases in documentation are simple and not enough so much for actual cases. * There are three examples supposed in the proposal, "use multiple deployment flavours", "deploy VNF connected to external network" and "deploy VNF as HA cluster". *Day 2 6. Support handling large query results by ETSI NFV * Introduce an extended feature for reducing a large amount of result for some queries defined in ETSI standards. * The idea is simply dividing the results in several pieces with paging. 7. Support FT of Multi tenant * There are two problems in multi-tenancy case, (1) No restriction in assigning a tenant,(2) Notifying events on different tenants. * The policy of assigning a tenant should be clarified and also Notification process under multi-tenancy should be changed. * We need to clear the policy of RBAC (Is it allowed to make admin user can access all resources?) 8. Sample Ansible Driver * There are no management drivers enable VNF Configuration using Ansible. So, add the scripts as samples and docs. * Revise the name of directories for considering conventioins in takcer repo is necessary. * This can be used for 'Add VNF Package sample for practical use cases' proposal. We wii support the sample development. 9. Support Robot Framework API * Currently Tacker functional tests mainly focus on checking various VNF patterns such as a simple VNF, multi VDU, volume attach and affinity set. Tacker community is advancing ETSI NFV standard compliance, and coverage of compliant API testing becomes important. * The proposal is to use Robot Framework to achieve automated API testing and in the first step, we adopt API test code released by ETSI NFV-TST010. 10. Add Tacker-horizon Unit Test Cases * `tacker-horizon` which provides very limited features, such as showing a list of registered VIMs, VNFDs or so. We don't use this feature so much without checking instances of Tacker quickly via intuitive Web GUI way. So, we have not maintained tacker-horizon so actively * One of the reasons why bugs in tacker-horizon have not fixed is that we have no unittests in. Although we can find a bug coincidentally while using the features, but should implement unittests because bugs in horizon are some contextual and not so easy to find by hand. *Day 3 11. Report for ETSI NFV API Conformance Test Results * Share the result of Remote NFV&MEC API Plugtest 2021, Totally 136 API Conformance test sessions were executed for [NFV-SOL003] were executed as well as for NFV-SOL005. * https://hackmd.io/q4DzQ6_2Q0e-TdmtBikVlQ?view 12. Reduce code clone from sol-kubernetes job of FT * There are much similar files can be reduced for functional tests. It makes maintenance more complicated and difficult. The goal is to reduce it to less than 20%. * In particular, since sol_kubernetes's code clone rate is up to 40% , we think it will be better to refactor to make future maintenance easier. * other details: https://hackmd.io/Wo8cBIH_RPe6ll1hNwmx1w?view 13. Reduce unnecessary test codes * It's similar as above item. We have very similar YAML files for definitions and useless template files for tests can be reduced. 14. Enhance NFV SOL_v3 LCM operation * Introduce the latest V2 APIs for LCM operation as below. * Scale VNF (POST /vnf_instances/{vnfInstanceId}/scale) * Heal VNF (POST /vnf_instances/{vnfInstanceId}/heal) * Modify VNF Information (PATCH /vnf_instances/{vnfInstanceId}) * Change External VNF Connectivity (POST /vnf_instances/{vnfInstanceId}/change_ext_conn) 15. Support ETSI NFV-SOL_v3 based error-handling operation * Introduce the latest V2 APIs for error handling operation as below. * Retry operation (POST /vnf_lcm_op_occs/{vnfLcmOpOccId}/retry) * Fail operation (POST /vnf_lcm_op_occs/{vnfLcmOpOccId}/fail) * Rollback operation (POST /vnf_lcm_op_occs/{vnfLcmOpOccId}/rollback) * Test scenario needs to include raising an error, becoming FAILD_TEMP, and executing the ErrorHandling API. * Timer adjusting and using inapporpriate vnf package can cause error. 16. Support ChangeCurrentVNFPackage * Add API for ChangeCurrentVNFPackage by which blue-green deployment and rolling update are supported. * Both of VIMs, OpenStack and Kubernetes, are covered. 17. Support heal and scale method in lcm_user_data * Enable to customize stack parameters for heal and scale operations in user script, `user_lcm_data.py` more specifically. * Call the proposed methods if it's existing in the script for the operations. Thanks, Yasufumi

1 0

[horizon][dev]Handle multiple login sessions from same user in Horizon
by Luz de Avila, Arthur 01 Nov '21

01 Nov '21

Hi everyone, In order to improve the system my colleagues and I would like to bring up a new feature to Horizon. We found out that an user is able to login in Horizon with the same credentials in multiple devices or/and browsers. This may be not very secure as the user can login in many different devices or/and browsers with the same credential. Thinking on that, we would like bring up more control to the admin of the system in a way that the admin can enable or disable the multiple login sessions according to the needs of the system. For a better follow up of this propose, a blueprint has been opened with more details about the idea and concepts of this and we would like the onion of the community whether this feature make sense to implement or not. The blueprint opened on launchpad: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/handle-multiple-login-sessio… Kind regards, Arthur Avila

2 1

[charms] Yoga PTG Summary
by Alex Kavanagh 01 Nov '21

01 Nov '21

Hi All Thanks to all who participated in the PTG discussions. We had some good sessions where we tackled thorny issues in the charms deployments of OpenStack. A brief set of highlights is: - The store holding all the charms (https://jaas.ai/) just happens to be migrating to a new home (https://charmhub.io/) within the timescales of the Yoga cycle and some of the changes in behaviour provide some challenges and also opportunities to both simplify the charms and provide a better operator experience. The discussions highlighted the pain points and the general direction that the migration could take around: - Charm upgrades - OpenStack upgrades - Series upgrades of the underlying operating system. - The charms deployment of OpenStack supports versions back to mitaka (pre yoga) and queens (yoga cycle onwards). This has recently presented challenges around Python 3 support, particularly with py35 being EOL September 2020, and with py36 (bionic LTS) EOL 23rd December 2021. We discussed various strategies and approaches around maintenance, security and support of queens onwards in terms of support and upgrades. - The charms team also maintains a CI infrastructure based on Jenkins and (more recently) self-hosted Zuul to test installation and upgrade of OpenStack solutions. We discussed the further migrations of services from Jenkins to Zuul and issues associated with it. - Discussions around building new charms and refreshing old charms for the new components and features in the previous xena cycle and oncoming yoga cycle. Our raw notes are here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/charms-yoga-ptg Thank you again for all the participation in setting the direction and priorities for the yoga cycle. -- Alex Kavanagh - PTL Yoga

1 0

Openstack ansible VS kolla ansible
by A Monster 01 Nov '21

01 Nov '21

Openstack-ansible uses LXC containers to deploy openstack services , while Kolla uses docker containers instead, which of these two deployment tools should I use for an Openstack deployment, and what are the differences between them.

3 2

is OVS+DPDK useful for general purpose workload
by Satish Patel 01 Nov '21

01 Nov '21

Folks, I have deployed openstack and configured OVS-DPDK on compute nodes for high performance networking. My workload is general purpose workload like running haproxy, mysql, apache and XMPP etc. When I did load testing I found performance was average and after 200kpps packet rate I noticed packet drops. I heard and read that DPDK can handle millions of packets but in my case its not true. I am using virtio-net in guest vm which processes packets in the kernel so I believe my bottleneck is my guest VM. I don't have any guest based DPDK applications like testpmd etc. does that mean OVS+DPDK isn't useful for my cloud? How do I take advantage of OVS+DPDK with general purpose workload? Maybe I have the wrong understanding about DPDK so please help me :) Thanks ~S

2 2

Re: Using ceph for openstack storage
by A Monster 01 Nov '21

01 Nov '21

Thank you for your response. Sadly, I'm talking about actual production, but I'm very limited in terms of hardware. I was thinking about using RAID for controller node as data redundancy, because I had the idea of maximizing the number of nova compute nodes, So basically i thought off using a controller with the following services ( Nova, Neutron, Keystone, Horizon, Glance, Cinder and Swift). Following the configuration you suggested, I would have : - 3 Controllers that are also Ceph Monitors - 9 Nova compute nodes and Ceph OSDs My questions are : - having multiple Ceph monitors is for the sake of redundancy or does it have a performance goal ? - Combining Ceph OSD and Nova compute wouldn't have performance drawbacks or damage the integrity of data stored in each node. wouldn't it be better is this case to use two separate servers for swift and glance and use RAID for data redundancy instead of using Ceph SDS. Thank you very much for you time.

3 2

Re: Router interfaces are down
by Slawek Kaplonski 01 Nov '21

01 Nov '21

Hi, Please don't drop ML from the thread. You have to go to the node where Your router is hosted and investigate there in the agent's logs. If ports are DOWN, I would start with checking in the L2 agent logs (neutron-ovs-agent or linuxbridge-agent, idk what You are using exactly). If there is no any errors there, You can also check neutron-server logs, why ports aren't set to be UP as well as checking neutron-l3-agent logs on the node where router is hosted. On czwartek, 28 października 2021 18:41:29 CET Jibsan Joel Rosa Toirac wrote: > Here I let you some screenshots of my Network Topology: > > > > El jue, 28 oct 2021 a las 7:43, Jibsan Joel Rosa Toirac (<jibsan94(a)gmail.com>) > escribió: > > Yes it’s neutron router. Well the router is centralized. It is located > > between the subnets and the node, all the subnets will pass through the > > router to internet, but I don’t know what else check to set it up for. I’m > > using a friend’s Openstack instance on a server to check out if I’m missing > > something and both nodes are the same. I will send you a screenshot of my > > network Topology. > > > > Greetings > > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 2:33 AM Slawek Kaplonski <skaplons(a)redhat.com> > > > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On środa, 27 października 2021 21:39:55 CEST Jibsan Joel Rosa Toirac > >> > >> wrote: > >> > Hello, I'm trying to route all the requests from a private vlan to > >> > internet. I have a private network and all the Virtual Machines inside > >> > >> the > >> > >> > subnet config can do everything between they, but if I ping to > >> > >> Internet, it > >> > >> > doesn't work. > >> > > >> > When I see the router_external it says all the interfaces are DOWN. > >> > >> By router_external, You mean neutron router, right? > >> If so, what kind of router it is, centralized HA or non-HA, or maybe DVR? > >> Is router scheduled properly to some node? You can check that with > >> command > >> like "neutron l3-agent-list-hosting-router <router_id>". > >> > >> > I have search in everywhere but I can't find a solution for this. > >> > > >> > Thank you for your time > >> > >> -- > >> Slawek Kaplonski > >> Principal Software Engineer > >> Red Hat -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

1 0

[Diversity] Diversity and Inclusion Meeting Reminder
by Amy Marrich 31 Oct '21

31 Oct '21

The Diversity & Inclusion WG invites members of all OIF projects to attend our next meeting Monday November 1st, at 17:00 UTC in the #openinfra- diversity channel on OFTC. The agenda can be found at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/diversity-wg-agenda. Please feel free to add any topics you wish to discuss at the meeting. Thanks, Amy (apotz)

1 0

Using ceph for openstack storage
by A Monster 31 Oct '21

31 Oct '21

I'm in the process of deploying an Openstack cloud and I've been aiming at maximize the number of computing node and in order to do that I've thought of using Ceph distributed storage and use an All in one openstack deployment, so that swift objects and glance's blocks are stored through Ceph. I have a total of 12 servers, so I'll end up with 1 Controller node for openstack services and use the remaining nodes for ceph cluster and computing. Is it worth it to use a ceph storage system , and what would be the minimum number of nodes required to deploy it.

2 1

Re: kolla-ansible wallaby manila ceph pacific
by wodel youchi 30 Oct '21

30 Oct '21

Hi, To *Buddhika Godakuru* I took a look into the manila-share docker deployed on my platforme and it contains the patch you mentioned in [1]. The Manila code does integrate the ceph test for version. [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/797955 Regards. Le mar. 26 oct. 2021 à 09:06, wodel youchi <wodel.youchi(a)gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi, > My deployment is from source, and I have little experience on how to > rebuild docker images, I can perhaps pull new images (built recently I > mean). > I took a look into docker hub and there are new manila images pushed 2 > days ago. > > Regards. > > Le lun. 25 oct. 2021 à 19:23, Buddhika Godakuru <bsanjeewa(a)kln.ac.lk> a > écrit : > >> Is your deployment type is source or binary? >> If it is binay, I wonder if this patch [1] is built into the repos. >> If source, could you try rebuilding the manila docker images? >> >> [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/797955 >> >> On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 at 20:21, wodel youchi <wodel.youchi(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I tried with pacific then with octopus, the same problem. >>> The patch was applied to kolla-ansible. >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> Le ven. 22 oct. 2021 00:34, Goutham Pacha Ravi <gouthampravi(a)gmail.com> >>> a écrit : >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 1:56 AM wodel youchi <wodel.youchi(a)gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I did that already, I changed the keyring to "*ceph auth >>>>> get-or-create client.manila -o manila.keyring mgr 'allow rw' mon 'allow r'* >>>>> " it didn't work, then I tried with ceph octopus, same error. >>>>> I applied the patch, then I recreated the keyring for manila as >>>>> wallaby documentation, I get the error "*Bad target type 'mon-mgr'*" >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, the error seems similar to this issue: >>>> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/51039 >>>> >>>> Can you confirm the ceph version installed? On the ceph side, some >>>> changes land after GA and get back ported; >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards. >>>>> >>>>> Le jeu. 21 oct. 2021 à 05:29, Buddhika Godakuru <bsanjeewa(a)kln.ac.lk> >>>>> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Dear Wodel, >>>>>> I think this is because manila has changed the way how to set/create >>>>>> auth ID in Wallaby for native CephFS driver. >>>>>> For the patch to work, you should change the command >>>>>> *ceph auth get-or-create client.manila mon 'allow r' mds 'allow r, >>>>>> allow rw path=/' osd 'allow rw pool=cephfs_data' mgr 'allow rw'* >>>>>> to something like, >>>>>> ceph auth get-or-create client.manila -o manila.keyring mgr 'allow >>>>>> rw' mon 'allow r' >>>>>> >>>>>> Please see Manila Wallaby CephFS Driver document [1] >>>>>> >>>>>> Hope this helps. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you >>>>>> [1] >>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/manila/wallaby/admin/cephfs_driver.html#authoriz… >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 23:19, wodel youchi <wodel.youchi(a)gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, and thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I tried to apply the patch, but it didn't work, this is the >>>>>>> manila-share.log. >>>>>>> By the way, I did change to caps for the manila client to what is >>>>>>> said in wallaby documentation, that is : >>>>>>> [client.manila] >>>>>>> key = keyyyyyyyy..... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * caps mgr = "allow rw" caps mon = "allow r"* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [root@ControllerA manila]# cat manila-share.log >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.286 7 INFO oslo_service.periodic_task [-] >>>>>>> Skipping periodic task update_share_usage_size because it is disabled >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.310 7 INFO oslo_service.service >>>>>>> [req-5b253656-4fe2-4087-b4ab-9ba2a8a0443f - - - - -] Starting 1 workers >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.315 30 INFO manila.service [-] Starting >>>>>>> manila-share node (version 12.0.1) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.320 30 INFO manila.share.drivers.cephfs.driver >>>>>>> [req-9e549670-d131-4572-b57e-761b513abc75 - - - - -] [CEPHFS1] Cep >>>>>>> h client found, connecting... >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.368 30 INFO manila.share.drivers.cephfs.driver >>>>>>> [req-9e549670-d131-4572-b57e-761b513abc75 - - - - -] [CEPHFS1] Cep >>>>>>> h client connection complete. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> [req-9e549670-d131-4572-b57e-761b513abc75 - - - - -] Error encountered >>>>>>> during i >>>>>>> n*itialization* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * of driver CephFSDriver@ControllerA@cephfsnative1: >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix=fs >>>>>>> volume ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad target type >>>>>>> 'mon-mgr'. 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): * >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 191, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> timeout=RADOS_TIMEOUT) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1460, in json_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager inbuf, >>>>>>> timeout, verbose) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1330, in send_ >>>>>>> command_retry >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager return >>>>>>> send_command(*args, **kwargs) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1412, in send_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> ArgumentValid("Bad target type '{0}'".format(target[0])) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> ceph_argparse.ArgumentValid: Bad target type 'mon-mgr' >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager During >>>>>>> handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/manager.py >>>>>>> ", line 346, in _driver_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.driver.do_setup(ctxt) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 251, in do_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> volname=self.volname) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 401, in volname >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.rados_client, "fs volume ls", json_obj=True) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 205, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> exception.ShareBackendException(msg) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix=fs >>>>>>> volume >>>>>>> ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad target type >>>>>>> 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:22.372 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> [req-9e549670-d131-4572-b57e-761b513abc75 - - - - -] Error encountered >>>>>>> during i >>>>>>> nitialization of driver CephFSDriver@ControllerA@cephfsnative1: >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix= >>>>>>> fs volume ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad >>>>>>> target type 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 191, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> timeout=RADOS_TIMEOUT) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1460, in json_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager inbuf, >>>>>>> timeout, verbose) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1330, in send_ >>>>>>> command_retry >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager return >>>>>>> send_command(*args, **kwargs) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1412, in send_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> ArgumentValid("Bad target type '{0}'".format(target[0])) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> ceph_argparse.ArgumentValid: Bad target type 'mon-mgr' >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager During >>>>>>> handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/manager.py >>>>>>> ", line 346, in _driver_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.driver.do_setup(ctxt) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 251, in do_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> volname=self.volname) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 401, in volname >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.rados_client, "fs volume ls", json_obj=True) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 205, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> exception.ShareBackendException(msg) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix=fs >>>>>>> volume >>>>>>> ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad target type >>>>>>> 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:26.379 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> [req-9e549670-d131-4572-b57e-761b513abc75 - - - - -] Error encountered >>>>>>> during i >>>>>>> nitialization of driver CephFSDriver@ControllerA@cephfsnative1: >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix= >>>>>>> fs volume ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad >>>>>>> target type 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 191, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> timeout=RADOS_TIMEOUT) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1460, in json_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager inbuf, >>>>>>> timeout, verbose) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1330, in send_ >>>>>>> command_retry >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager return >>>>>>> send_command(*args, **kwargs) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1412, in send_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> ArgumentValid("Bad target type '{0}'".format(target[0])) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> ceph_argparse.ArgumentValid: Bad target type 'mon-mgr' >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager During >>>>>>> handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/manager.py >>>>>>> ", line 346, in _driver_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.driver.do_setup(ctxt) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 251, in do_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> volname=self.volname) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 401, in volname >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.rados_client, "fs volume ls", json_obj=True) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 205, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> exception.ShareBackendException(msg) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix=fs >>>>>>> volume >>>>>>> ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad target type >>>>>>> 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:34.387 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> [req-9e549670-d131-4572-b57e-761b513abc75 - - - - -] Error encountered >>>>>>> during i >>>>>>> nitialization of driver CephFSDriver@ControllerA@cephfsnative1: >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix= >>>>>>> fs volume ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad >>>>>>> target type 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 191, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> timeout=RADOS_TIMEOUT) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1460, in json_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager inbuf, >>>>>>> timeout, verbose) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1330, in send_ >>>>>>> command_retry >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager return >>>>>>> send_command(*args, **kwargs) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1412, in send_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> ArgumentValid("Bad target type '{0}'".format(target[0])) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> ceph_argparse.ArgumentValid: Bad target type 'mon-mgr' >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager During >>>>>>> handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/manager.py >>>>>>> ", line 346, in _driver_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.driver.do_setup(ctxt) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 251, in do_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> volname=self.volname) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 401, in volname >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.rados_client, "fs volume ls", json_obj=True) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 205, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> exception.ShareBackendException(msg) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix=fs >>>>>>> volume >>>>>>> ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad target type >>>>>>> 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:03:50.404 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> [req-9e549670-d131-4572-b57e-761b513abc75 - - - - -] Error encountered >>>>>>> during i >>>>>>> nitialization of driver CephFSDriver@ControllerA@cephfsnative1: >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix= >>>>>>> fs volume ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad >>>>>>> target type 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 191, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> timeout=RADOS_TIMEOUT) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1460, in json_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager inbuf, >>>>>>> timeout, verbose) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1330, in send_ >>>>>>> command_retry >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager return >>>>>>> send_command(*args, **kwargs) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1412, in send_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> ArgumentValid("Bad target type '{0}'".format(target[0])) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> ceph_argparse.ArgumentValid: Bad target type 'mon-mgr' >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager During >>>>>>> handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/manager.py >>>>>>> ", line 346, in _driver_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.driver.do_setup(ctxt) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 251, in do_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> volname=self.volname) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 401, in volname >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.rados_client, "fs volume ls", json_obj=True) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 205, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> exception.ShareBackendException(msg) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix=fs >>>>>>> volume >>>>>>> ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad target type >>>>>>> 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:04:22.436 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> [req-9e549670-d131-4572-b57e-761b513abc75 - - - - -] Error encountered >>>>>>> during i >>>>>>> nitialization of driver CephFSDriver@ControllerA@cephfsnative1: >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix= >>>>>>> fs volume ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad >>>>>>> target type 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 191, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> timeout=RADOS_TIMEOUT) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1460, in json_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager inbuf, >>>>>>> timeout, verbose) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1330, in send_ >>>>>>> command_retry >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager return >>>>>>> send_command(*args, **kwargs) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1412, in send_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> ArgumentValid("Bad target type '{0}'".format(target[0])) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> ceph_argparse.ArgumentValid: Bad target type 'mon-mgr' >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager During >>>>>>> handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/manager.py >>>>>>> ", line 346, in _driver_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.driver.do_setup(ctxt) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 251, in do_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> volname=self.volname) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 401, in volname >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.rados_client, "fs volume ls", json_obj=True) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 205, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> exception.ShareBackendException(msg) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix=fs >>>>>>> volume >>>>>>> ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad target type >>>>>>> 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:05:26.438 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> [req-9e549670-d131-4572-b57e-761b513abc75 - - - - -] Error encountered >>>>>>> during i >>>>>>> nitialization of driver CephFSDriver@ControllerA@cephfsnative1: >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix= >>>>>>> fs volume ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad >>>>>>> target type 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 191, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> timeout=RADOS_TIMEOUT) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1460, in json_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager inbuf, >>>>>>> timeout, verbose) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1330, in send_ >>>>>>> command_retry >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager return >>>>>>> send_command(*args, **kwargs) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1412, in send_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> ArgumentValid("Bad target type '{0}'".format(target[0])) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> ceph_argparse.ArgumentValid: Bad target type 'mon-mgr' >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager During >>>>>>> handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/manager.py >>>>>>> ", line 346, in _driver_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.driver.do_setup(ctxt) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 251, in do_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> volname=self.volname) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 401, in volname >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.rados_client, "fs volume ls", json_obj=True) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 205, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> exception.ShareBackendException(msg) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix=fs >>>>>>> volume >>>>>>> ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad target type >>>>>>> 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:07:34.539 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> [req-9e549670-d131-4572-b57e-761b513abc75 - - - - -] Error encountered >>>>>>> during i >>>>>>> nitialization of driver CephFSDriver@ControllerA@cephfsnative1: >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix= >>>>>>> fs volume ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad >>>>>>> target type 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 191, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> timeout=RADOS_TIMEOUT) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1460, in json_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager inbuf, >>>>>>> timeout, verbose) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1330, in send_ >>>>>>> command_retry >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager return >>>>>>> send_command(*args, **kwargs) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_argparse.py", line 1412, in send_ >>>>>>> command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> ArgumentValid("Bad target type '{0}'".format(target[0])) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> ceph_argparse.ArgumentValid: Bad target type 'mon-mgr' >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager During >>>>>>> handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager Traceback >>>>>>> (most recent call last): >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/manager.py >>>>>>> ", line 346, in _driver_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.driver.do_setup(ctxt) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 251, in do_setup >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> volname=self.volname) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 401, in volname >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> self.rados_client, "fs volume ls", json_obj=True) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager File >>>>>>> "/var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/manila/share/drivers/ce >>>>>>> phfs/driver.py", line 205, in rados_command >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager raise >>>>>>> exception.ShareBackendException(msg) >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> manila.exception.ShareBackendException: json_command failed - prefix=fs >>>>>>> volume >>>>>>> ls, argdict={'format': 'json'} - exception message: Bad target type >>>>>>> 'mon-mgr'. >>>>>>> 2021-10-20 10:11:50.596 30 ERROR manila.share.manager >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le mer. 20 oct. 2021 à 00:14, Goutham Pacha Ravi < >>>>>>> gouthampravi(a)gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 2:35 PM wodel youchi < >>>>>>>> wodel.youchi(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> Has anyone been successful in deploying Manila wallaby using >>>>>>>>> kolla-ansible with ceph pacific as a backend? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have created the manila client in ceph pacific like this : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *ceph auth get-or-create client.manila mon 'allow r' mds 'allow r, >>>>>>>>> allow rw path=/' osd 'allow rw pool=cephfs_data' mgr 'allow rw'* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When I deploy, I get this error in manila's log file : >>>>>>>>> Bad target type 'mon-mgr' >>>>>>>>> Any ideas? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could you share the full log from the manila-share service? >>>>>>>> There's an open bug related to manila/cephfs deployment: >>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1935784 >>>>>>>> Proposed fix: >>>>>>>> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/802743 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> බුද්ධික සංජීව ගොඩාකුරු >>>>>> Buddhika Sanjeewa Godakuru >>>>>> >>>>>> Systems Analyst/Programmer >>>>>> Deputy Webmaster / University of Kelaniya >>>>>> >>>>>> Information and Communication Technology Centre (ICTC) >>>>>> University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, >>>>>> Kelaniya, >>>>>> Sri Lanka. >>>>>> >>>>>> Mobile : (+94) 071 5696981 >>>>>> Office : (+94) 011 2903420 / 2903424 >>>>>> >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> University of Kelaniya Sri Lanka, accepts no liability for the >>>>>> content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the >>>>>> basis of the information provided, unless that information is subsequently >>>>>> confirmed in writing. If you are not the intended recipient, this email >>>>>> and/or any information it contains should not be copied, disclosed, >>>>>> retained or used by you or any other party and the email and all its >>>>>> contents should be promptly deleted fully from our system and the sender >>>>>> informed. >>>>>> >>>>>> E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free >>>>>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive >>>>>> late or incomplete. >>>>>> >>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> >>>>> >> >> -- >> >> බුද්ධික සංජීව ගොඩාකුරු >> Buddhika Sanjeewa Godakuru >> >> Systems Analyst/Programmer >> Deputy Webmaster / University of Kelaniya >> >> Information and Communication Technology Centre (ICTC) >> University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, >> Kelaniya, >> Sri Lanka. >> >> Mobile : (+94) 071 5696981 >> Office : (+94) 011 2903420 / 2903424 >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> University of Kelaniya Sri Lanka, accepts no liability for the content of >> this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of >> the information provided, unless that information is subsequently confirmed >> in writing. If you are not the intended recipient, this email and/or any >> information it contains should not be copied, disclosed, retained or used >> by you or any other party and the email and all its contents should be >> promptly deleted fully from our system and the sender informed. >> >> E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as >> information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late >> or incomplete. >> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >

3 3

[kuryr][ptg] Yoga cycle PTG summary
by Maysa De Macedo Souza 30 Oct '21

30 Oct '21

Hello, I would like to thank you for the great discussion and engagement during the PTG sessions. It was a really productive week. Here follows the summary of the Kuryr sessions during the PTG: *Day 1 - Tuesday* Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kuryr-yoga-ptg - Xena retrospective: - We celebrated the contributions from many Outreachy applicants and the interns. - The addition of new features, such as: - The Reconciliation mechanisms that enforces the matching of a Kubernetes Service with a load-balancer. - The setting of Octavia Listener timeout based on annotation of the Kubernetes Service. - Improvements on the logs to facilitate debuggability and troubleshooting. - Usage of Kubeadm to facilitate configuration of Kubernetes cluster with Devstack. - Many documentation improvements. - Stable branches: - We have many stable branches which are not highly maintained anymore - action items: EOL the branches till Stein - As we currently release with OpenStack, it was proposed that we release with Kubernetes - action items: Keep following the OpenStack release, but make sure that when there is a Kubernetes release it's updated in Kuryr. - Future of the CI: - action items: - Move all the gates to use CRI-O and have one with Docker. - Attempt to remove the Amphora dependency for the API load-balancer when OVN Octavia driver is available. - Move the jobs that use OVN to voting. - Rate limit requests: - Possibility to limit the requests to Octavia during the reconciliation between load-balancers and Kubernetes Service . - Possibility to limit the amount of requests sent to Neutron *Day 2 - Wednesday* Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kuryr-yoga-ptg - Merge of Kuryr lib into Kuryr-kubernetes: - action items: analyze the feasibility of moving the needed pieces into Kuryr-kubernetes and sync with other projects that use it. - Different log levels: - action items: - clean up some unnecessary debugging messages and move the level of some to warning or info. - Feasibility of reducing the current approach of one Network per Namespace, to one Network per cluster to reduce resource usage: - action items: - check if there is a plan to implement Network cascade delete with the Neutron team - attempt to create a PoC with one Pod Network per Cluster - Possibility of creating external reachable services without Amphora. - Discussion about the open Kubernetes proposal of notifying the user when a Network Policy is actually enforced. - Drop the liveness checks for certain scenarios: - The controller and CNI restarts has helped with certain cornes cases, but it can decrease the availability of Kuryr if restarted many times - action items: - drop restarts on unavailability of Neutron/k8s API - enforce restarts when all the Kuryr watches, handlers and drivers are not running - Drop usage of Flask debug servers - Currently many servers created by Kuryr like Health, Prometheus exporter and Kuryr daemon are based on flask and could likely be moved to another type of server. - action item: Move the kuryr-cni to kuryr-daemon communication to use gRPC Don't exitate to contact us either on IRC or email if you have any questions. Cheers, Maysa Macedo.

1 0

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary 29th Oct, 21: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 29 Oct '21

29 Oct '21

Hello Everyone, Here is this week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. TC Meetings: ============ * TC this week IRC meeting held on Oct 28th Thursday. * Most of the meeting discussions are summarized below (Completed or in-progress activities section). Meeting full logs are available @ - https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-10-28-15.00.log.html * Next week's meeting will be video call on google meet on Oct 28th, Thursday 15:00 UTC, feel free the topic on agenda[1] by Oct 27th. 2. What we completed this week: ========================= * Add openstack/ci-log-processing project into TaCT[2] * PTG and Summary: I have summarized the TC summary along with the TC+community leaders interaction sessions. Recordings: Day1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQRKYummsHM Day2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHj7cpBlbYo Day3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RT492bi6Xto Summary: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025554.… Two topics 1. RBAC and 2. Pain points will be continue to discuss in post-PTG call or TC weekly meeting. 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for Yoga cycle ------------------------------ * I have started the etherpad to collect the Yoga cycle targets for TC[3]. Open Reviews ----------------- * Nine open reviews for ongoing activities[4]. RBAC discussion: continuing from PTG ---------------------------------------------- We are continuing the RBAC discussion we left in PTG. I have sent the doodle poll to select the appropriate time, feel free to add your vote if you are interested to be part of it[5]. Yoga release community-wide goal ----------------------------------------- * With the continuing the discussion on RBAC, we are re-working on the RBAC goal, please wait until we finalize the implementation[6] Adjutant need maintainers and PTLs ------------------------------------------- You might have seen the email[7] from Adrian to call the maintainer for Adjutant project, please reply to that email or here or on openstack-tc channel if you are interested to maintain this project. New project 'Skyline' proposal ------------------------------------ * We discussed it in TC PTG and there are few open points about python packaging, repos, and plugins plan which we are discussion on ML. Updating the Yoga testing runtime ---------------------------------------- * We agreed to update the below things in the Yoga testing runtime: 1. Add Debian 11 as tested distro 2. Bump highest python version to test to 3.9 Patch is up for the review[8], once that is merged I will update the job template. Stable Core team process change --------------------------------------- * Current proposal is under review[9]. Feel free to provide early feedback if you have any. Merging 'Technical Writing' SIG Chair/Maintainers to TC ------------------------------------------------------------------ * Work to merge this SIG to TC is up for review[10]. One repo of this SIG openstack/training-labs is called for maintainers[11] and rest other are moved under TC & FC SIG. TC tags analysis ------------------- * TC agreed to remove the framework and it is communicated in ML[12]. Project updates ------------------- * Retiring js-openstack-lib [13] * Retiring kolla-cli [14] 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[15]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15 UTC [16] 3. Office hours: The Technical Committee offers a weekly office hour every Tuesday at 0100 UTC [17] 4. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/815318 [3] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-yoga-tracker [4] https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+status:open [5] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025569.… [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/815158 [7] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025555.… [8] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/815851 [9] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/810721 [10] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/815869 [11] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025586.… [12] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025571.… [13] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/807163 [14] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/814603 [15] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [16] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting [17] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Office_hours -gmann

1 0

[PTL] PTG Summaries Blog
by helena＠openstack.org 29 Oct '21

29 Oct '21

Hi PTLs, I have loved seeing all the PTG summaries that have been rolling in! I am working to gather all of them and create a blog post for [ openstack.org/blog ]( http://openstack.org/blog ). If you would like for your summary to be included in the blog please post it to the mailing list and send me the link to the archived email by Tuesday, November 2nd. Thank you all for your involvement in PTG and I look forward to seeing all the summaries! Cheers, Helena

2 1

[TC][First Contact][Skyline][OpenDev][Release][OpenStackSDK] Oct 2021 PTG Summaries
by Kendall Nelson 29 Oct '21

29 Oct '21

Hello! I tried to summarize some of the discussions I was in throughout the week for those that could not join! Hopefully some of it is helpful :) Technical Committee[1] Monday- 25 people Monday we focused on the relationship between the Project Team Leads (PTLs) and the Technical Committee (TC). We discussed the role of the TC, and what PTLs look to us for, what we should be doing that we are not, what we are doing that we shouldn’t be. Things we do that maybe might not be the best use of everyone’s time, etc. Some of the main things that came out of discussions were: - Creating a repo (possibly) to house documents about how certain things should be implemented if a project is going to implement them, for example quotas. These technical guidelines will hopefully give more direction to new projects entering the OpenStack space and help unify and standardize the implementations of features across already established OpenStack projects. These documents will not have accompanying deadlines like community goals, but will instead be used as resources and reference documents to further enhance OpenStack. - How to engage with OpenStack Operators and get them to be more vocal about feedback and encouraging interaction with the project specific communities with regards to bugs and project direction. Ideas included making sure to use the [ops] tag on emails to the openstack-discuss list and ensuring that users and operators know the mailing list is for them just as much as it is for developers. Also, making sure to communicate topics to the twitter handle for wider engagement to those that might not be watching the mailing list closely. Thursday- 18 people Another full day of discussions. We covered the Docs SIG state of affairs, Yoga testing runtime, TC tags, a project adoption ladder, and release name process changes (yes, again). The tldrs; of all of that: - Some of the Docs SIG repos are being retired, some are going to live with the First Contact SIG. - Python 3.9 is now a voting test and 3.10 will be added as non voting. Python 3.6 will be kept until CentOS Stream 8 is replaced by Stream 9. - There is a proposal to drop the tag framework altogether[1.1]. - We do NOT want to add a whole process for incubating new projects; simply keep the process we have and apply a ‘tech preview’ note to their first release where applicable. - We are going to change back to having the community vote for the names which will also be proposed by the community, but also pre-vetted by the community before voting begins. The final vetting will be the Open Infra Foundation’s legal team as it always has been. Friday- 28 people Another nother full day of discussions! We covered operator pain point targeting, Skyline project proposal, RBAC, Community Goals, Xena Wrap up, and were also joined at the very end by several members of the Kubernetes Steering Committee (YAY cross community collaboration!). Those tldrs; - We want to make sure all the pain points are being actively tracked and if there are things that are common across many projects those get more attention as potential community goals down the road. - Skyline is largely ready to be proposed as a project. There are a few things that might need to get rearranged and changed so that it can be released as a part of OpenStack but that shouldn’t stop them from being approved. They could be included in the Yoga release as a ‘tech preview’. - I don’t even know how to summarize the RBAC stuff lol. That one I can’t tldr for you. Go check out those notes in the etherpad[1]. - The main thing we discussed wrt community goals is that things like RBAC that we want as a community goal cannot be scoped to a single release and we are fine with that. - In the Xena wrap up, we did a retrospective of the things we accomplished and also agreed to keep monthly video meetings in the upcoming cycle. - We again loved having members of the k8s steering committee join us! We chatted about how the CNCF project ladder works, how the OpenStack’s ‘Upstream Investment Opportunities' works, and CI/CD resourcing struggles for both communities. OpenStackSDK / OpenStackClient[2] - 10 people First we kicked off with Artem giving us an update on the r1 branch which is nearing the point that we can merge it! There is only one part missing- compute has not been completely reconfigured to use proxy; there are still a number of sections of the code that rely on the cloud layer and directly touch the APIs. Once that is completed however; we will be able to merge r1 into master and celebrate! We legitimately discussed having a party and publicizing it, so if you have opinions about any of that (or want to help wrap things up), please reach out to us in #openstack-sdks. We talked a little bit about the exceptional cases where we might consider deprecating OSC commands. Basically we concluded that we still don’t want to do it except in very specific circumstances. We are generally okay with doing it for removed APIs such that they are actually being completely removed from the API and not just removed in a microversion and are essentially still reachable in older microversions. Lastly, we chatted with the Korea user group about their mentoring program that is in the process of wrapping up. It sounds like it will be a yearly thing for them and we (the SDK team) want to try to help support those efforts more going forward if the organizers of the mentoring program can give us heads up like they did this last time. We look forward to working with them more in the future! First Contact SIG[3] - 2 people Discussions were pretty brief as not many people attended, but we did follow up on a discussion earlier in the day that the Technical Committee had about having the First Contact SIG become the new owners of a couple of repositories formerly owned by the Docs SIG (a reaction to a general lack of spoons on that team and moving in the direction of moving the status of that SIG inactive). The First Contact SIG agreed to take ownership of the contributor-guide repo and the training-guides repo. Work on that migration/reconfiguration of ACLs will begin soon. If you have any questions or are interested in getting involved, please contact the First Contact SIG or the Technical Committee OpenDev[4] - 4 people The session was mostly just a working one, but we also had a little time to catch up and chat and stay connected as a team :) Not much to say here really. Skyline[5]- 4 people I attended their sessions on Tuesday and while it was largely quiet when I was there we did chat a little bit about the upcoming TC discussions about the project and I invited them to join in those- spoiler; they came! Release Management [6] - 6 People The largest topic we discussed in the release management ptg session was everyone’s favorite topic- release cadence! We talked about how it might finally be time to move to 12 month cadence. Things have slowed down sufficiently with regards to feature development (and this has been consistent throughout the last couple releases). It would reduce the frequent upgrades that distros have to work through, and the process we currently maintain can be easily stretched to accommodate a year. All in all, the release team supports the idea and think that if we are to make the transition, when we finish the ‘Z’ release and start over at the beginning of the alphabet again, that would be a natural time to also switch to a one year release cycle rather than the 6th month cadence we have been keeping up with for quite some time. The decision is ultimately up to the Technical Committee, but the release team supports the idea. -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo) [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-yoga-ptg [1.1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025571.… [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2021-ptg-sdk-cli [3] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2021-ptg-first-contact [4] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2021-ptg-opendev [5] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2021-ptg-skyline [6] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-yoga-ptg

1 0

[tc][operators][all] TC tags framework to be dropped
by Radosław Piliszek 29 Oct '21

29 Oct '21

Dear OpenStack Operators, Due to no response to the original query about usefulness of the TC tags framework [1] (which was repeated in each and every following TC newsletter), the TC has decided to drop the tags framework entirely. [2] [3] [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-September/02480… [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025554.… [3] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-yoga-ptg Kind regards, -yoctozepto

2 2

[OpenStack-Ansible] LXC containers apt upgrade
by Taltavull Jean-Francois 29 Oct '21

29 Oct '21

Hi All, Following the recent Let's Encrypt certificates expiration, I was wondering what was the best policy to apt upgrade the operating system used by LXC containers running on controller nodes. Has anyone ever defined such a policy ? Is there an OSA tool to do this ? Regards, Jean-François

2 2

[masakari] Yoga PTG summary
by Radosław Piliszek 29 Oct '21

29 Oct '21

Hi! This is a quick summary of Masakari's Yoga PTG. Quick as the PTG itself was quite quick. :-) We have summarised the progress made in Xena and decided to continue the efforts related to supporting monitoring with Consul and tracking issued evacuations. We have also discussed one new topic regarding circuit breaking in case of a mass failure of instances (e.g., due to a storage network failing in one location). To this end, the proposal is to introduce a protection mechanism (circuit breaking) based on a static time window (static at least in the first iteration) per segment. suzhengwei is to write the spec for this. Raw notes are available at https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/masakari-yoga-ptg Kind regards, -yoctozepto

1 0

[sahara][ptg] Yoga PTG Summary
by Juntingqiu Qiujunting (邱军婷) 28 Oct '21

28 Oct '21

Hi all: Thank everyone for taking time and attending session. The discussion content of the PTG meeting is as follows: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/sahara-yoga-ptg 1、Sahara has supported boot virtual machine from volume. https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/sahara-specs/specs/backlog/boot-from-… 2、Sahara deploys a dedicated clusters need the network to be a flat one for instances. Could set up a "jumphost" which can be reached by the controllers, and that can reach the instances, need not the network to be a flat one for instance. https://docs.openstack.org/sahara/latest/admin/advanced-configuration-guide… 3、Discuss about which Plugins should be kept and updated and which ones should be dropped? The conclusion is that such as HDP、CDH、MapR Storm and Spark can be deleted in Yoga. 4、Improve the unit testing and documentation of Sahara project. Currently, the activity of the Sahara project is relatively low. We can discover its potential and expand its usage scenarios. Thank you Fossen --------------------------------- Fossen Qiu | 邱军婷 CBRD | 云计算与大数据研发部 T: 18249256272 E: qiujunting(a)inspur.com<mailto:qiujunting@inspur.com> 浪潮云海

1 0

[ptg][cinder] yoga virtual PTG summary
by Brian Rosmaita 28 Oct '21

28 Oct '21

Sorry for the delay, it's posted here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderYogaPTGSummary The wiki page contains links to all the recordings. It's a wiki page, so feel free to make clarifications or corrections. Action items are noted in the "conclusions" sections of most of the summaries, so please look to remind yourself what you have committed yourself to. cheers, brian

1 0

Problems with Openstack internal:external router
by Jibsan Joel Rosa Toirac 28 Oct '21

28 Oct '21

Hello I finished to set up a brand new Openstack server, I had already other up and running without any problems, yet on mine the router wich allows the external connection has all the interfaces down and I don't know what else to do. I've tried everything but it still not working. Please any help with this? I let you here a couple of screenshots of my network topology

1 0

[manila] FIPS compliance (Notice: third party drivers)
by Carlos Silva 28 Oct '21

28 Oct '21

Hello Zorillas and interested stackers! During the PTG week, we had a session where we discussed FIPS compatibility and compliance. In this PTG recording [1] you can see the discussion around this topic and our motivations to achieve such things for Manila. We're writing to follow up on the PTG discussion we had, and to update you on our move towards FIPS compatibility and compliance. We're aiming for manila FIPS compatibility with the Yoga cycle, meaning our CI jobs should be passing. FIPS compliance is a Z(orilla) cycle goal. For third party maintainers, to test if your code is FIPS compatible, use an image with fips enabled as discussed in [3]. In the etherpad we used in our previous discussion [2], there's a mention for some drivers that are using non-FIPS compliant libraries, and some examples of libraries that shouldn't be used. If FIPS is enabled in the controller where the driver is, and the driver is using one of the non permitted libraries, it will possibly lead the driver to malfunctioning. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to us (carloss and ashrod98) in #openstack-manila. We're always here to support our community. [1] https://youtu.be/mlTx71GIp1w?t=4864 [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/yoga-manila-FIPS [3] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/state-of-fips-in-openstack-ci-yoga Thanks! ---- Carlos da Silva (carloss) Ashley Rodriguez (ashrod98)

1 0

[kolla] Yoga PTG summary
by Michał Nasiadka 28 Oct '21

28 Oct '21

Hi everyone, Thank you all who participated in the PTG discussions and shared their thoughts and opinions. Here is the summary of the topics we have discussed: # General ## We agreed to stop using Launchpad’s Blueprints functionality (which was inconsistently used by us). ## We’ve discussed recently proposed services to Kolla: Adjutant has a complicated status now (vacant PTL seat and looking for contributors) Skyline Venus We agreed that a project can be added to Kolla/Kolla-Ansible once it fulfills following the criteria of being in OpenStack governance for 1 cycle and having 1 release. An exception to this criteria is when the patch content is in good quality and there are core reviewers interested in making this functionality merged (but still the project needs to be in OpenStack governance). ## We also discussed adding OSISM collection of Grafana dashboards and Prometheus Alertmgr rules in order to improve the “default deployment” experience for Kolla-Ansible users. ## There was a decision taken to finally retire kolla-cli (since it has been deprecated long time ago). # Kolla ## We have discussed deprecating and dropping of binary type of Kolla images: Pros: * less CI load, less maintenance burden (for a limited Kolla team), users would be running more tested images (since Kolla/Kolla-Ansible CI runs source images CI jobs as voting) Cons: * User survey showed that a considerable amount of users is using them - unclear if because that’s a default - or they have chosen to do so. * Overriding package versions in source variant can be more troublesome than it is in binary Action plan: * Improve documentation for source images, especially focusing on its advantages and what might change for current users of binary (when they make the transition) * Mark binary images as deprecated in Yoga cycle (add a note about deprecation in kolla-build CLI output) * Improve override options for source images (upper-constraints, etc) ## The next discussion item was to use a common base (single Linux distribution) for Kolla images Action plan (to make it possible): * Fix Bifrost and OVN builds for Debian (which are broken now) * Create CI jobs for mixed host-os/in-container-image-os (including upgrade jobs) * Deprecate binary images after those two actions are done * Provide a decent plan with justification and operator feedback in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-only-on-debian <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-only-on-debian> * Deprecate CentOS only images (like qdrouterd) At the same time we agreed on not pursuing CentOS Stream 9 or Ubuntu 22.04 LTS image builds, when those will show up/be required. ## Migration from ElasticSearch to AWS OpenSearch (Elasticsearch fork after ES changed license) Action items: * Deprecate Elasticsearch in Yoga * Build OpenSearch in Yoga # Kolla-Ansible ## Podman support We agreed to implement it with as minimum Ansible playbooks/roles changes as possible (mainly rework kolla_docker.py) Action plan: * Reduce scope of existing patch to deploy a single service (e.g. MariaDB) * Write up a rough implementation plan in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-docker-systemd-podman <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-docker-systemd-podman> * Add systemd units support for existing Docker implementation * Add podman installation in Kolla-Ansible’s baremetal role * Add podman support upon systemd support for Docker ## Change default deployment to use ML2/OVN (instead of ML2/OVS) We agreed on the criteria to do so: * Debian OVN packages in Yoga * Working and reliable migration path * A way to prevent accidental migration to OVN for existing deployments And until that is resolved - we’re not going to pursue that decision. ## Keystone system scope continued Action plan: * Proposed to split into 3 parts ** use system scope for keystone admin user (done in Xena) ** assign admin role to service users with system scope ** provide flags to enable scope enforcement and new defaults ## Let’s Encrypt Resume efforts to implement it (since we upgraded to HaProxy 2.2 which enables seamless TLS key/cert replacement) ## More HA settings by default Action plan: * Add a docs HA page that describes typical Kolla-Ansible deployment (haproxy, galera cluster, etc) with references to other projects HA configurations (e.g. neutron, octavia) ## Rocky Linux Host OS support Proposal: Replace CentOS Stream support to Rocky Linux in the longer run Action plan: * Add support for Rocky Linux as Host OS (no Kolla container images) # Kayobe ## Multiple environments part 3 Proposed improvements: * merge OpenStack custom configs * merge Kolla Ansible group_vars * dependencies between environments * CI testing ## Support RAID with Bifrost via cleaning steps and deploy steps Action plan: * Add support to baremetal_node_action Ansible module for manual cleaning and passing deploy steps * Option: Enable automated cleaning to erase metadata * Add support for using this functionality to Bifrost * Add passing of deploy_steps and cleaning_steps from Kayobe to Bifrost ## Create collection(s) for external Ansible roles that Kayobe depends on (those from StackHPC namespace) * Group Kayobe external roles to collections (the whole ,,ecosystem’’ of stackhpc.* roles) * Encourage Kayobe role users to move to collections * Add/improve CI testing for the collection For details please check the Kolla Yoga PTG etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-yoga-ptg <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-yoga-ptg> And see you on the weekly meetings: https://meetings.opendev.org/#Kolla_Team_Meeting <https://meetings.opendev.org/#Kolla_Team_Meeting> Best Regards, Michal Nasiadka

1 0

答复: [cyborg][ptg] Yoga PTG Summary
by Brin Zhang(张百林) 28 Oct '21

28 Oct '21

More details on etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cyborg-yoga-ptg brinzhang 发件人: Brin Zhang(张百林) 发送时间: 2021年10月28日 19:37 收件人: 'openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org' <openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org> 抄送: 'xin-ran.wang(a)intel.com' <xin-ran.wang(a)intel.com>; Alex Song (宋文平) <songwenping(a)inspur.com>; Jorhson Deng (邓兆森) <dengzhaosen(a)inspur.com>; Juntingqiu Qiujunting (邱军婷) <qiujunting(a)inspur.com>; 'eric_xiett(a)163.com' <eric_xiett(a)163.com> 主题: [cyborg][ptg] Yoga PTG Summary Hi everyone! First of all I would like to thank everyone for taking time and attending session. I think we had pretty productive time and discussions. You may find discussion summaries below: * With nova-cyborg interaction ** Cyborg vGPU support, we write a spec that adds the prefilter and the traits against every Nova RP and then cyborg contributors to provide a subsequent spec for Cyborg using their own trait ** Continue to work on resume/suspend feature, add the unit tests and update the PoC codes ** Works on PMEM instance cold migration in Nova, the spec is already merged in Xena release, and it need to re-propose it in Yoga release * Introducing some new accelerators driver ** xilin FPGA Driver ** PMEM Driver ** Optimization the exist device function, such as FPGA program interface, GPU/vGPU support * New feature will be support in Yoga release ** Get device profile get by name. It’s need to add a microversion, because of the request path_url changed, proposed the spec but need to update *** SPEC URL: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/813183 ** Add disable/enable device status to mark the device whether can be use or not ***SPEC URL: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/815460 ** We would like to improve the parameter validation, consider checking the api parameters with schema ** Add batch query ARQs for more than one instance support in Get *One* Accelerator Request API * Docs improving, such as nova-cyborg interaction manual and API ref docs * Improve the exception mechanism, improve the efficiency of abnormal judgment in unit testing * Improve the abnormal instance handling scenarios, for example, when the host is disconnected and the device is damaged, how should we set the device status and the accelerator instance state at this time. brinzhang

1 0

[cyborg][ptg] Yoga PTG Summary
by Brin Zhang(张百林) 28 Oct '21

28 Oct '21

Hi everyone! First of all I would like to thank everyone for taking time and attending session. I think we had pretty productive time and discussions. You may find discussion summaries below: * With nova-cyborg interaction ** Cyborg vGPU support, we write a spec that adds the prefilter and the traits against every Nova RP and then cyborg contributors to provide a subsequent spec for Cyborg using their own trait ** Continue to work on resume/suspend feature, add the unit tests and update the PoC codes ** Works on PMEM instance cold migration in Nova, the spec is already merged in Xena release, and it need to re-propose it in Yoga release * Introducing some new accelerators driver ** xilin FPGA Driver ** PMEM Driver ** Optimization the exist device function, such as FPGA program interface, GPU/vGPU support * New feature will be support in Yoga release ** Get device profile get by name. It’s need to add a microversion, because of the request path_url changed, proposed the spec but need to update *** SPEC URL: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/813183 ** Add disable/enable device status to mark the device whether can be use or not ***SPEC URL: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/815460 ** We would like to improve the parameter validation, consider checking the api parameters with schema ** Add batch query ARQs for more than one instance support in Get *One* Accelerator Request API * Docs improving, such as nova-cyborg interaction manual and API ref docs * Improve the exception mechanism, improve the efficiency of abnormal judgment in unit testing * Improve the abnormal instance handling scenarios, for example, when the host is disconnected and the device is damaged, how should we set the device status and the accelerator instance state at this time. brinzhang

1 0

[manila][ptg] Yoga cycle PTG summary
by Goutham Pacha Ravi 28 Oct '21

28 Oct '21

Hello Zorillas and other awesome Stackers, Thank you for participating in the Yoga cycle Project Teams Gathering. A special thanks to the folks at the OpenInfra Foundation who provided the platform for this event! We brainstormed on numerous topics. You'll find the unabridged notes and links in the main etherpad [1]. Video recordings from the event are posted on our Youtube channel [2]. The following is my summary of the proceedings. Please feel free to follow up here, or on OFTC's #openstack-manila if you have any questions. == Xena cycle retrospective == Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-xena-retrospective * We celebrated successful Outreachy internships (Kafilat Adeleke and Archana Kumari), completion of the senior design project of students from Boston University (Ashley Rodriguez, Nicole Chen and Mark Tony) and two Open Source Day mentoring events at the Grace Hopper Celebration. * We have long term contributors in kafilat and archanaserver, along the lines of ashrod98 (who is now a Red Hatter!), disap (at Microsoft!), kiwi_36 (continuing his unified limits work), maaritamm (at city network, is manila core!) and many others. Very proud of the effort the team puts in to attract and retain such talent in the community. * We also discussed the mentoring efforts coinciding with the Yoga release (Northeastern University Cloud Computing course project, Outreachy internships, others). * We anticipate more changes to the maintainers team in the Yoga cycle in our continued effort to build domain expertise around the team, and avoid reviewer burn out. * Thanks to the enthusiastic participation, and to a well groomed bug backlog (kudos, vhari) we had two successful bugsquash weeks and a hack-a-thon during the Xena cycle. We're pruning down the list of stale issues collaboratively. The team liked the frequency of these events. * We discussed the responses for the 2021 User Survey and key takeaways (need for active/active HA, unified limits, unified cli, virtiofs) * Action Items: ** Plan a hack-a-thon in Yoga (topics welcome) ** Update questions for the 2022 user survey ** Plan periodic collaborative code review events alongside the bug squash events to prevent languishing patches. == Share transfers == * haixin highlighted the need for APIs to safely transfer shares across project namespaces and discussed some caveats, and a rough workflow for the feature * To ensure secure multi-tenancy, many back end share drivers use the project_id metadata in their provisioning paths - so transferring resources must send appropriate notifications * For DHSS=True, transfering the share alone makes little sense without first transfering the share network onto which the share is exported - however, multiple shares can be associated with one share network, so this could need a multi-phase transfer needing an ability to rollback. * Action Items: * Propose a spec and discuss the multi-stage implementation of this feature == Project testing and Interoperability improvements == * vhari shared plans for the improvement of the interop guidelines associated with manila * We touched upon the work lkuchlan and vhari are doing to align optional feature testing with tempest's best practices * Third party CI maintainers were reminded that they must be running scenario tests * Action Items: * Team looks at the possible tests to add as advisory to the 2021.11 guideline: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/refstack-test-analysis == CephFS driver and integration changes == Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/yoga-ptg-manila-cephfsnfs-cephadm * vkmc highlighted the changes intended in the Manila CephFS driver to adopt the ceph mgr nfs APIs instead of the DBUS interactions that the Ganesha interace is coded to perform. The ceph mgr NFS APIs would only work on cephadm-deployed ceph nfs (nfs-ganesha) clusters. * Ceph nfs can be deployed like any other ceph daemon in an active/active HA cluster. One concern was the backwards incompatible changes to default nfs-ganesha configuration - this is being worked out. * TripleO developers joined us to discuss deployment changes, and the upgrade concerns including the eventual change in the NFS VIP. * Action Items: * Share notes about the deployment and upgrade changes necessary to get manila's CephFS driver to work with an active/active NFS HA cluster for the benefit of operators as well as deployment tools like tripleo, kolla-ansible, juju charms, etc. == Manila deployment at the Edge == Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/yoga-ptg-manila-at-the-edge * I quizzed fultonj about the use cases and architecture of the Distributed Compute Node edge deployments that tripleo is capable of orchestrating. * DCN now supports persistent block storage, and enables setting up the service in a multi-backend configuration with local-to-compute backends associated with availability zones that represent the edge sites. * We captured work items to similarly support manila-share at edge sites in this architecture to enable RWX storage at edge sites, and brainstormed future possibilities around the feature (cross site share replication) * Action Items: - A spec to support manila-share in an active/active HA configuration - Testing template for A/A with vendor share drivers == Metadata APIs for all user facing resources == Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/yoga-manila-metadata * ashrod98 discussed the ongoing work to generalize user defined metadata to all end-user facing resources. Currently users can attach metadata to shares and access rules, and the service provides metadata to export locations. * There are changes to the initial design that were brainstormed wrt RBAC and service/operator metadata. * The new APIs are going to be supported in the openstackclient shell implementation * Action Items: * Reviewer attention needed for the changes to the metadata spec, and for new RBAC guarding operator metadata. == Manila UI updates == * vkmc, carloss and haixin presented the plan to update the UI's feature parity * We have two outreachy internship proposals around implementing new UX around share networks and for enhancing integration testing for manila-ui * Action items: * Outreachy contributor period is open, lookout for applicants seeking reviews * Identify trivial API features that can be supported with little effort for the Yoga cycle hack-a-thon == VirtIOFS == Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-manila-virtio-fs-support-yptg-october-2… * tbarron presented updates regarding the ongoing prototyping for nova's support of virtiofs. * There's a demo of how the feature's expected to work: https://asciinema.org/a/IZ7UrhwspxBN63XsOl9JrTcUX?speed=1.5 * The nova discussion (https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-ptg) included mechanics of supporting read-only attachments, os-share library, mount tags and use cases for baremetal nodes. The specification will be refined to answer some of these questions. * This continues to be a multi-release effort as changes in libvirt, qemu, kvm were needed for live virtiofs attachments. * Action Items: * Review/Refine nova spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/813180 == Multiple share network subnets in an AZ == Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ptg-multiple-subnet * nahimsouza and felipe_rodrigues presented the use case for share networks to allow multiple subnets per availability zone. * This proposal would make dual stack ipv4/ipv6 networking possible for DHSS=True * Users would also have the ability to modify share networks that were in use - new network allocations will be possible for existing share servers, however, network allocations cannot be deleted. * Concerns were raised regarding the user experience and error signalling when port allocations cannot be made from all relevant subnets. * Action items: * Determine what needs to happen when a subnet has run out of allocations * Propose a specification discussing the API and driver interface impact to accommodate this change == FIPS compatibility and compliance == Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/yoga-manila-FIPS * carloss, ashrod98 and ade_lee spoke of the cross project effort to get FIPS compatibility and compliance testing * We discussed manila's direct/indirect use of cryptographic libraries and FIPS compliant alternatives (md5 in code, and paramiko's use of non-fips compliant digests); manila-tempest-plugin needs fixes along the same lines since it relies on paramiko. * Currently, the team's writing new CI jobs to test compatibility - these should merge by the end of the Yoga release cycle; the goal for compliance would be the Zorilla release (yes, i said it). * Action items: * Work on FIPS compatibility jobs in the Yoga release cycle == Secure RBAC changes in Yoga == Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/yoga-ptg-manila-srbac * vhari and I rounded up the work done so far to update the default RBAC policies across manila APIs and highlighted known issues, and pending work items * Cross service arbitrations on behalf of a user are ongoing discussions elsewhere - examples of these include manila's generic driver where the user's namespace and quota are consumed to create the nas server, backing volume and networking * We are continuing to implement tempest tests and anticipate a large portion to be completed during the Yoga cycle. * We don't plan to support cloud profiles with the manilaclient shell. Users are encouraged to switch to the openstackclient shell to use cloud profiles. * Action items: * Close on known issues in manila code * Complete protection and tempest test coverage == Paying down some technical debt in Yoga == * python-manilaclient still uses keystoneclient instead of keystoneauth1 - vkmc and gouthamr will work on this early in the Yoga release cycle * sqlalchemy2.0 changes - ack'ing SADeprecationWarnings and switching to using the new db engine facade exposed by oslo.db - felipe_rodrigues and gouthamr will work on this during the Yoga cycle * these are wishlist items that need volunteers to drive them to completion: * the generic driver doesn't yet support online extensions - * the generic driver can support more than 26 volumes per share server - this is a wishlist item that needs a volunteer to drive it * we need to publish the container driver image to a container registry from its development within the manila-image-elements project == Backing up shares == Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ptg-backup-manila * We were joined by operators and storage experts from SAP, CSI Piemonte, NetApp, Red Hat and CERN to discuss current use cases and methods to backing up manila shares * Existing data protection and disaster recovery tools within manila (creating and mounting snapshots, cloning snapshots to new shares, reverting snapshots in-place, replicating shares and snapshots) were compared against the need for scheduling, efficient, incremental, durable/ex-situ/non-homogenous backup destinations, whole container vs selective file backup and recovery. * Available DIY external tooling (restic, borg, urbackup, other) and wrappers were discussed * Creating a backup solution based off-of the manila-data service was considered in the past, the spec was abandoned. It could be revived; however, we could benefit from presenting the need, a state of affairs as they are before exploring solutions. * Action Items: * We'll write up a doc on data protection for manila shares and invite operators to review them and propose future plans; anyone interested in collaborating in this space can get in touch with felipe_rodrigues == OpenStackCLI updates == Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-osc-yoga * Thanks to maaritamm's awesome work, and the enthusiastic hack-a-thon participation from the community, we're very close to parity between OSC and the manilaclient shell. So, the team decided to stop adding new features in the manilaclient shell as a way to gradually wean users off of it. * When using the manilaclient shell from the Yoga release, users will be shown a deprecation warning suggesting an eventual removal (looking at the "A" release for this one, thoughts are welcome). * maaritamm proposed a hack-a-thon for completing the functional testing around manilaclient's osc plugin. * The osc plugin also needs the api microversion negotiation bits that the manilaclient shell currently has. * Action items: * We assigned owners to pending reviews, and missing osc commands * Deprecate the native manilaclient shell. == Manila CSI updates == Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/yoga-ptg-manila-csi * gman0 and tbarron presented the state of the kitchen for manila-csi since the Xena PTG and shared future plans * share backup is now a focus area for pvs serviced by manila-csi - the design involves being able to mount manila snapshots as read only PVs on backup pods and extracting relevant files. * we discussed e2e testing that's being added to the cloud-provider-openstack repository and the results of the perf/scale testing with manila-csi on openshift == OpenStackSDK updates == Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/yoga-manila-openstacksdk-update * we've had several interns working on exposing manila APIs within the openstacksdk since the wallaby release * kafilat has numerous open changes, wrapped up a successful outreachy internship recently * megharth, Jiabo, tutkuna and rishabhdutta from Northeastern University picked up the implementation of the remaining API resources for the Yoga cycle * this continues to be a multi-cycle effort and the plan is to eventually use manila APIs via the openstacksdk within manila-ui, ansible-collections-openstack and manila's OSC plugin. * Action Items: * team will review open changes against the openstacksdk repository pertaining to manila Thanks for reading thus far. It's possible a lot can get lost in translation :) As a reminder, do check out the complete recordings on our Youtube channel! [2] -- Goutham Pacha Ravi PTL, OpenStack Manila [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/yoga-ptg-manila [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVAClI82Ths&list=PLnpzT0InFrqDhp1A3lBi_guLA…

1 0

Router interfaces are down
by Jibsan Joel Rosa Toirac 27 Oct '21

27 Oct '21

Hello, I'm trying to route all the requests from a private vlan to internet. I have a private network and all the Virtual Machines inside the subnet config can do everything between they, but if I ping to Internet, it doesn't work. When I see the router_external it says all the interfaces are DOWN. I have search in everywhere but I can't find a solution for this. Thank you for your time

2 1

[all][tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting on Oct 28th at 1500 UTC
by Ghanshyam Mann 27 Oct '21

27 Oct '21

Hello Everyone, Technical Committee's next weekly meeting is scheduled for Oct 28th at 1500 UTC. If you would like to add topics for discussion, please add them to the below wiki page by Wednesday, Oct 27th, at 2100 UTC. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting -gmann

1 1

SSSE3 CPU flag not available
by tarun singhal 27 Oct '21

27 Oct '21

Hello, I have an Openstack cluster which was created using devstack. And recently I was involved in project in which there is a dependency on SSSE3 cpu flag in an Openstack VM instance, to accomplish certain tasks. I searched many posts but couldn't find a definitive solution. The suggestion mentioned didn't worked for me either. I have added below in /etc/nova/nova.conf and restarted devstack(a)n-cpu.service cpu_mode = host-model cpu_model_extra_flags = ssse3 Please let me know a possible way to enable SSSE3 cpu flag in a vm instance. Thanks, Tarun

1 0

[tripleo] x509 certificate Issue in Overcloud Deployment
by Anirudh Gupta 27 Oct '21

27 Oct '21

Hi Team, I am trying to install the Tripleo setup on the Openstack Train. While deploying the overcloud, I am getting an x509 certificate error in downloading the images from quay.io This is because of a proxy certificate in the LAB. Before installing Undercloud, I manually placed the certificate in order to avoid this issue. How can I take care of placing such certificates in case of an overcloud. Regards Anirudh Gupta

2 1

Xena RDO Release Announcement
by Amy Marrich 27 Oct '21

27 Oct '21

If you're having trouble with the formatting, this release announcement is available online at https://blogs.rdoproject.org/2021/10/rdo-xena-released/ ---- *RDO Xena Released* The RDO community is pleased to announce the general availability of the RDO build for OpenStack Xena for RPM-based distributions, CentOS Stream and Red Hat Enterprise Linux. RDO is suitable for building private, public, and hybrid clouds. Xena is the 24th release from the OpenStack project, which is the work of more than 1,000 contributors from around the world. The release is already available on the CentOS mirror network at http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/cloud/x86_64/openstack-xena/. The RDO community project curates, packages, builds, tests and maintains a complete OpenStack component set for RHEL and CentOS Stream and is a member of the CentOS Cloud Infrastructure SIG. The Cloud Infrastructure SIG focuses on delivering a great user experience for CentOS users looking to build and maintain their own on-premise, public or hybrid clouds. All work on RDO and on the downstream release, Red Hat OpenStack Platform, is 100% open source, with all code changes going upstream first. PLEASE NOTE: RDO Xena provides packages for CentOS Stream 8 only. Please use the Victoria release for CentOS Linux 8 which will reach End Of Life (EOL) on December 31st, 2021 (https://www.centos.org/centos-linux-eol/) *Interesting things in the Xena release include:* - The python-oslo-limit package has been added to RDO. This is the limit enforcement library which assists with quota calculation. Its aim is to provide support for quota enforcement across all OpenStack services. - The glance-tempest-plugin package has been added to RDO. This package provides a set of functional tests to validate Glance using the Tempest framework. - TripleO has been moved to an independend release model (see section TripleO in the RDO Xena release) The highlights of the broader upstream OpenStack project may be read via https://releases.openstack.org/xena/highlights.html *TripleO in the RDO Xena release:* - In the Xena development cycle, TripleO has moved to an Independent release model( https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/xena/tripleo-inde… ) and will only maintain branches for selected OpenStack releases. In the case of Xena, TripleO will not support the Xena release. For TripleO users in RDO, this means that: - RDO Xena will include packages for TripleO tested at OpenStack Xena GA time. - Those packages will not be updated during the entire Xena maintenance cycle. - RDO will not be able to included patches required to fix bugs in TripleO on RDO Xena. - The lifecycle for the non-TripleO packages will follow the code merged and tested in upstream stable/xena branches. - There will not be any tripleoxena container images built/pushed, so interested users will have to do their own container builds when deploying xena. You can find details about this [in RDO webpage](https://www.rdoproject.org/documentation/tripleo-in-xena/) *Contributors* During the Xena cycle, we saw the following new RDO contributors: - Chris Sibbitt - Gregory Thiemonge - Julia Kreger - Leif Madsen Welcome to all of you and Thank You So Much for participating! But we wouldn’t want to overlook anyone. A super massive Thank You to all 41 contributors who participated in producing this release. This list includes commits to rdo-packages, rdo-infra, and redhat-website repositories: - Alan Bishop - Alan Pevec - Alex Schultz - Alfredo Moralejo - Amy Marrich (spotz) - Bogdan Dobrelya - Chandan Kumar - Chris Sibbitt - Damien Ciabrini - Dmitry Tantsur - Eric Harney - Gaël Chamoulaud - Giulio Fidente - Goutham Pacha Ravi - Gregory Thiemonge - Grzegorz Grasza - Harald Jensas - James Slagle - Javier Peña - Jiri Podivin - Joel Capitao - Jon Schlueter - Julia Kreger - Lee Yarwood - Leif Madsen - Luigi Toscano - Marios Andreou - Mark McClain - Martin Kopec - Mathieu Bultel - Matthias Runge - Michele Baldessari - Pranali Deore - Rabi Mishra - Riccardo Pittau - Sagi Shnaidman - Sławek Kapłoński - Steve Baker - Takashi Kajinami - Wes Hayutin - Yatin Karel *The Next Release Cycle* At the end of one release, focus shifts immediately to the next release i.e Yoga. *Get Started* To spin up a proof of concept cloud, quickly, and on limited hardware, try an All-In-One Packstack installation. You can run RDO on a single node to get a feel for how it works. Finally, for those that don’t have any hardware or physical resources, there’s the OpenStack Global Passport Program. This is a collaborative effort between OpenStack public cloud providers to let you experience the freedom, performance and interoperability of open source infrastructure. You can quickly and easily gain access to OpenStack infrastructure via trial programs from participating OpenStack public cloud providers around the world. *Get Help* The RDO Project has our users(a)lists.rdoproject.org for RDO-specific users and operators. For more developer-oriented content we recommend joining the dev(a)lists.rdoproject.org mailing list. Remember to post a brief introduction about yourself and your RDO story. The mailing lists archives are all available at https://mail.rdoproject.org. You can also find extensive documentation on RDOproject.org. The #rdo channel on OFTC IRC is also an excellent place to find and give help. We also welcome comments and requests on the CentOS devel mailing list and the CentOS and TripleO IRC channels (#centos, #centos-devel in Libera.Chat network, and #tripleo on OFTC), however we have a more focused audience within the RDO venues. *Get Involved* To get involved in the OpenStack RPM packaging effort, check out the RDO contribute pages, peruse the CentOS Cloud SIG page, and inhale the RDO packaging documentation. Join us in #rdo and #tripleo on the OFTC IRC network and follow us on Twitter @RDOCommunity. You can also find us on Facebook and YouTube.

1 0

[largescale-sig] Next meeting: Oct 27th, 15utc
by Thierry Carrez 27 Oct '21

27 Oct '21

Hi everyone, The Large Scale SIG meeting is back this Wednesday in #openstack-operators on OFTC IRC, at 15UTC. You can doublecheck how that time translates locally at: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20211027T15 A number of topics have already been added to the agenda, including discussing the topic of our next OpenInfra.Live show! Feel free to add other topics to our agenda at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting Regards, -- Thierry Carrez

1 1

How to control data write into a multiattach volume
by open infra 27 Oct '21

27 Oct '21

Hi, I have created a multiattach volume and attached it to several Windows VMs/Instances. Is there away in OpenStack to drop all data written by each VM/instances? I am supposed to periodically detach and attach the multiattach volume. Regards, Danishka

2 1

[cinder] Bug deputy report for week of 10-27-2021
by Sofia Enriquez 27 Oct '21

27 Oct '21

This is a bug report from 10-13-2021-15-09 to 10-27-2021. Agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Medium - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1948916 'Inconsistency for resource column between quota_usages and reservations table'. Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1947518 '[RBD] Cinder started requiring write access to glance images of RBD pool'. Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1947123 '[IBM GPFS] NFS driver throws an error while volume creation in copy-on-write mode'. Assigned to Digvijay Ukirde. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1947134 '[IBM GPFS] NFS driver does the same filesystem check locally and fails initializing the driver in copy-on-write mode'. Assigned to Digvijay Ukirde. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1946262 'NetApp ONTAP is losing QoS with assisted storage migration'. Assigned to Felipe Rodrigues. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1948934 '[Victoria] Backported test requires newer ddt than included in test-requirements.txt'. Unassigned. Incomplete - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1947066 'snapshot status hang in backing-up'. Unassigned. Low - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1948507 'TypeError when computing QOS feature name'. Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1947834 'wrong href returned in volume detail'. Unassigned. -- Sofía Enriquez she/her Software Engineer Red Hat PnT <https://www.redhat.com> IRC: @enriquetaso @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

1 0

[qa][ptg] PTG Summary
by Martin Kopec 27 Oct '21

27 Oct '21

Hi everyone, thank you all who participated in the PTG discussions and shared their thoughts and opinions. It's very much appreciated! Here is the summary of the topics we have discussed [1]: * Migration of devstack and Tempest tests to new secure RBAC ** Tempest side appear to be ready, further work is required on Devstack's side. * Xena retrospective ** Among good things belong: *** a few long term unfinished effort got completed *** a participation in an open source contest, which also helped in the above point *** a great response time in devstack patches *** quite prompt fixing devstack gate issues - thank you all who are active in Devstack, great job! ** Bad things to mention: *** not enough active contributors in Tempest and especially in Patrole project *** long review time in Tempest and Patrole * Cleanup of duplicated scenario.manager ** we will start with removing duplicated scenario.manager (Tempest's stable interface) methods from plugins ** this follows the 'making tempest.scenario.manager interface stable' effort done ~2 cycles ago * Test inheritance conventions, are there any ** we discussed usage of DDT library - it has turned out it complicates things when the test names are generated dynamically (it's hard to track the tests then) and because in DDT case the tests are not associated with any UUID ** * FIPS support ** current issues with FIPS at [3] - raised by Ade Lee ** the plan here from high level point of view is we'll use new jobs (with FIPS enabled) in Tempest so that we can identify and fix the tests that don't comply with FIPS * Patrole stable release updates and discussion ** A big question has been raised, do we have someone who can drive the patrole's migration to new RBAC? That's important because as mentioned before, there aren't many contributors in Patrole. ** There was an idea raised to retire the project - mainly because it's hard to maintain it (not enough contributors) and because the gates were broken for several months during the Xena cycle and mostly none had noticed - which raises another question - is the project needed/used by anyone? The discussed topics are transformed into priority items [2] we will be focusing on this cycle. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-yoga-ptg [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-yoga-priority [3] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/state-of-fips-in-openstack-ci-yoga Regards, -- Martin Kopec Senior Software Quality Engineer Red Hat EMEA

1 0

[kolla-ansible][neutron]BGP Problems
by Franck VEDEL 27 Oct '21

27 Oct '21

Hello, I'm trying to get BGP / BGP speaker / DRAgent to work with Neutron on one side and a Cisco router on the other. I work under Centos / Kolla-ansible / Wallaby. I adapt this technical documentation (https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/latest/admin/config-bgp-dynamic-routing.…) to my configuration but I am having difficulties (the cisco router sends a TCP SYN frame to the router in Openstack, TCP port 179, but the router sends back an RST. I don't understand why, no security on the router port). Do you have any links to help, tutorials, that would be of great help to me. Thanks in advance. Franck

2 2

[openstack-ansible][osa][ptg] Yoga PTG summary
by Dmitriy Rabotyagov 27 Oct '21

27 Oct '21

1 0

Devstack stack run issue
by Venkata Krishna Reddy 27 Oct '21

27 Oct '21

3 3

[tc][all][ Yoga Virtual PTG Summary
by Ghanshyam Mann 26 Oct '21

26 Oct '21

Hello Everyone, I am summarizing the Technical Committee discussion that happened in the Yoga cycle PTG last week. Recordings: Day1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQRKYummsHM Day2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHj7cpBlbYo Day3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RT492bi6Xto TC + Community leaders interaction ------------------------------------------ This is our first session in PTG to interact with community leaders and ask for feedback on TC. Below are the topics we discussed in this feedback session * What is TC responsibility: This is the first feedback we started this session, to discuss what is the role of TC other than accepting/ removing the projects and community-wide goals. does TC need to have a strong vision and start working on that? Why not TC do more technical work than spend time on composing resolutions or so? All those were valid points and we all agreed that TC should be doing more technical work and providing more guidance to the community on the cross-project works for example RBAC, Unified limit (more of similar way API SIG is doing on API side). * Improving community-wide goal process: Another feedback was on the effectiveness of community-wide goals. A few of the community-wide goals were not ready when they were selected. Even a few like pdf goal changed the implementation in milestone-2 and projects have to update the previous implementation. Or sometimes we try too much to do instead of small steps like IPV6 testing. With all feedback, we agreed to have a more concrete checklist when we select any goal and also check project bandwidth to complete the work. * Fewer contributors: Fewer contributors issue is from many projects, to solve that at some extent, TC will encourage projects to apply in outreachy/mentorship programs where few projects have received a good amount of help. * Improving CI: Improving CI is the next topic which we discussed in TC slots on Thursday. One key topic in this was "Request to be able to recheck on a single test instead of the whole check test" as many projects like Ironic gate has more often neutron failure and they have to recheck the complete set of jobs. The issue can be from DHCP, memory etc. We do not think allowing job-specific recheck is the right direction here and instead, we should encourage projects to solve the failures we get in the gate which can improve the code stability. Also, we should encourage projects to monitor the gate failures. >From the above discussion, we are taking below two action items for TC: 1. TC to start composing the technical guidelines on various topics like 'unified limit' etc similar way API SIG has done. 2. TC to add a more specific checklist for community-wide goal readiness and make them more successful as they are currently. TC interop sync on guidelines ----------------------------------- We discussed interop tests requirements. One of the points brought that if starter kits impact interop guidelines to consider but it does not. Can cinder be separated from "OpenStack Powered Compute" if it can be used as standalone? The Interop team need to check if there are cloud without cinder and how they apply for interop certification. On tests requirement by interop, our current process stays same that if interop defined the capabilities in new guidelines then the test writing can be requested or even an interop group can propose the test in Tempest or Tempest plugins. Technical Writing (doc) SIG need a chair and more maintainers ----------------------------------------------------------------------- We are merging this SIG repo into TC responsibility. There are not many activities nowadays on this SIG or repo it own so it should not impact the TC work as such. We agreed to distribute this SIG repo in * TC: api-site, constellations, and openstack-manuals repos under * FC SIG: contributor-guide, training-guides, and upstream-institute-virtual-environment * For training-labs which is for COA, I will check with Foundation on ownership or it. Thanks, Stephen for serving as chair for this SIG. Yoga testing runtime: Review & Update if needed ---------------------------------------------------------- We discussed/iterate over the Yoga testing runtime on new distro and python versions to tests. Distro to tests: * We agreed on including "Debian Bullseye" as a distro in the testing runtime. * centos9-stream release time is not clear so we are keeping centos8-stream for now. * centos8 is planned to be EOL at end of 2021, If you see failure on or stable branch testing, then you can update it to centos8-stream (devstack support is already there) But we do not need to change the testing runtime for stable branches as such. Python Versions to test: * py3.8 as voting (no change from currently tested) * py3.9 as voting * py3.10 as non voting. * keep py3.6 until we move from centos8-stream to centos9-stream I will update the testing runtime doc and job template for that. TC tags review ------------------ You might have seen the email from yoctozepto about a query on TC tag usage[1]. As we did not get any response in the email, we did final checks in PTG. We agreed to start the tag framework removal proposal on ML and if there is no objection for a week or so then we will remove it. Improvement in project governance ------------------------------------------ In the past couple of cycles, we have seen few projects that are not so active or not getting more attention from users. This discussion was to brainstorm the process to keep monitoring such projects and especially when there is a new project application how we can monitor those in initial time to check if they have all the required things working to stay as official OpenStack project. The first thing we discussed introducing the different levels of the project something similar to CNCF (sandbox, incubated, graduated) or OpenStack used to have (incubation -> incubated projects). But it is not known if these levels will work well in our governance. With the low cost to maintain projects in OpenStack governance (as long as they are active). Being an OpenStack official project is one way to give that project more visibility in the market and attract users/contributors. With all these points, we agreed not to introduce the different levels in the project hierarchy but we will introduce a new process of 'Tech Pre-review' for new project applications so that we can monitor the new projects if they are doing good and all minimum required things are working smoothly. As the next step, we will be working to define the "Tech Pre-review" checklist and timeline etc. Release name process change ----------------------------------- We want to discuss two points 1. allow community members to vote on release name 2. some pre-trademark (non-paid) checks, in this topic but due to time limit we discussed first only. As you might know, we changed the electorate on release naming from community to TC which has been objected to in the past when we changed it and during the naming voting also in the past couple of cycles. We have simplified the name proposal criteria in the past which solved the issue that occurred in past on TC removing the name. We agreed on: * The community can propose names that meet the convention. * The TC will ensure that the name is not offensive based on community feedback. * Allow community members to vote on the proposed names. * After Z cycle, go back to 'A' and go through the alphabet (obviously don't re-use names). Pain Point targeting ----------------------- Two key pain points we collected during TC weekly meetings were 1. Rabbitmq 2. OpenStackClient support. But the etherpad has a lot more pain points not only from projects but also from operator or project has collected those from operators. We need to iterate the list again which we will continue doing in TC weekly meetings. TC members will encourage projects to fix or have a look into those pain points if the operator has added them. TC also can help a few of the pain points to solve consistently by defining the technical guidelines for such common pain points. As the next step, we will continue reviewing the list in etherpad[2]. 'Skyline' application to become an official OpenStack Project ------------------------------------------------------------------------ We discussed the new project application Skyline which is a dashboard project for OpenStack. One of the key points raised is about non-integrated projects UI-plugins (like every project has horizon plugins for their UI). How and who is going to implement the new UI plugins on the project's side? Also, there is more work needed on repos and python packaging side for which discussion is going in separate mailing thread[3]. Overall, we are ok to proceed with the proposal once the python package/repos things are set up correctly. Discussion on new RBAC ------------------------------ There were a lot of discussions on the new RBAC on various project sessions. it was clear from the discussion or points raised in those sessions that we are not using the system scope in the way it should be used. We should keep system-level operation only for system scoped and project level for the project. If any system users want to perform the project level operation then they can request the project token and then request. Also, 'admin' term at all levels domain, system, and the project is the most confusing term and we would like to change that to 'manager' or so. The discussion is not yet over and due to the time limit, we wanted to continue it after PTG too. As a summary, we selected this (current way) as Yoga cycle goal which we will re-iterate. I will set up the call to continue the discussion and send on openstack-discuss mailing list. For a detailed summary, please refer to L122 in policy popup etherpad[4]. Community-wide goals ---------------------------- Based on the feedback received in TC+community leaders sessions, we would like to make sure we have the proper checklist to know this goal is ready to start (in terms of implementation details as well as projects bandwidth). Rico and I had worked on such a checklist in the past but did not push for review which we should do now. We are also restructuring the community-wide goal timeline by decoupling them from the release cycle. At a time we will select one or more goals to start with one or more milestones. They can be multi-cycle goals or single based on the goal nature and work it needs. This way we will make sure that we complete the work needed to be done for that goal irrespective of the current cycle release. Xena Retrospective ----------------------- What went well? * Xena cycle tracker status: Completed the 9 items out of 13, others in progress. * Think having the weekly meetings went well instead of just office hours. * Got good feedback from the community about what they expect from the TC. * We have been good at keeping our open reviews low. What to change or any other feedback? * Be more technical, provide more technical guidance. * Get a feedback loop from the community and work on that feedback. Pop Up Team Check In ---------------------------- * Secure RBAC / Policy As discussed in RBAC discussion, there are a lot of work still needed along with community-wide goal. We decided to continue this pop-up team for the Yoga cycle at least. * Encryption Slow progress but still more work to do (waiting on changes in Barbican). The Team is hoping for more progress in the coming cycle. We will continue this pop-up team. Meeting check ----------------- We will continue the weekly meeting at the same time they are currently and also continue the monthly video call. We will continue using google meet until we figure out the recording things in meetpad or so. We did not discuss or check on office hours whether to continue those or not which we will continue in weekly meetings. User Survey Feedback Responses --------------------------------------- We will start working on analyzing the feedback from the user survey. Jay will summarize the feedback and then we will start composing the action items accordingly. k8s Steering Committee Cross community Discussions ----------------------------------------------------------------- This is our last hour of the PTG. This is cross-community sessions we continue organizing in PTG. From Kubernetes steering committee, we had Dims, Bob, Christoph joined along with OpenStack TC and a few non-tc members. The first topic we talked about is the different levels in the CNCF ladder and project confirmation process. This area is mostly taken care of by CNCF and Kubernetes community more concentrate on the technical part. Like OpenStack, Kubernetes is also seeing a slow down in project/SIG activities especially on community leaders. Kubernetes is trying mentor/cohort and more distributed roles by documenting the responsibility of that role that will help contributors to discuss it with their employer. OpenStack Upstream investment opportunity is one of the things we discussed and how successful that is. One of the benefits of this is we can communicate the help-needed things on various platforms/forums. ELK is one (the only as of now) example of success. Like OpenStack, Kubernetes also lacks in CI/CD resourcing and funding. This seems like a common problem in many OSS communities. Yoga cycle tracker ---------------------- Like we did in Xena cycle, TC is defining the cycle-wise tracker to complete the set of things TC would like to work on. For the Yoga cycle also we will continue with the tracker. Based on the PTG discussion, we have collected 9 items for the Yoga cycle to complete. I have captured those in the below etherpad which will be using it for progress tracking also. - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-yoga-tracker [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-September/02480… [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination [3] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025397.… [4] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/policy-popup-yoga-ptg [5] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-xena-tracker -gmann

1 0

[TripleO] PTG Summary
by James Slagle 26 Oct '21

26 Oct '21

TripleO had PTG sessions on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, followed by a Directord+Task-Core hackfest on Thursday. The main etherpad for the PTG is at https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-yoga-topics (includes links to recordings) Overall Summary =============== Our sessions were well attended with good cross collaboration from external stakeholders (storage, network, compute, etc). We had a good mix of topics, which I felt helped maintain interest and engagement. Topics ranged from future proposals, integrations, CI, and infrastructure. Our attendance was between 30-40 for most sessions. The underlying theme of the week was about the proposed migration from Ansible to Directord+task-core. Overall, I felt we accomplished clarifying the scope of the proposed change and articulating the reasons why the change is necessary, as well as understanding the benefits. With the heavy current investment in Ansible specific components, we emphasized the need for migration tooling wherever possible. No significant objections were raised about the approach. However, we settled on the next steps being agreement in the spec, and agreement around the end to end integration in TripleO. We continued to tie most other topics we discussed back to this topic to make sure we were considering the future impacts. The hackfest on Thursday further helped to understand the proposal and illustrated several key concepts that are presently missing in TripleO. Namely, those of dynamic service dependency management, job result caching and fingerprinting, and the messaging architecture. We had around 30 participants during the hackfest. We took a team photo on Thursday which we can be seen at https://slagle.fedorapeople.org/TripleO-Yoga-PTG-Team-Photo.png Thanks for the participation everyone! Sessions ======== Monday ------ 1310-1350 Directord/task-core introduction and overview https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-directord-task-core The overview of Directord and task-core was presented, and we clarified the scope of the change, which is primarily about replacing Ansible in TripleO. As part of the change, we will need to migrate from all Ansible specific implementations (playbooks, roles, tasks, modules, actions, etc) to pure Python or Directord orchestrations and components. We emphasized the need for migration tooling wherever possible. No major objections were raised, and I felt the team understood the proposed benefits. Next steps are to finish the spec and continue on the TripleO integration. 1405-1445 task-core task graphs and execution concepts https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-task-core-execution Further illustrated the benefits and functionality gained with task-core, particularly around the dynamic dependency ordering for tasks. Explained the benefits for services with a lot of external deployment tasks, such as Octavia. 1500-1540 (CI) Tripleo Health https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-ptg-tripleo-health Really great work by the CI team on http://ci-health.tripleo.org/ and https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci-health-queries. We need to get the whole team committed to maintaining the queries for the most benefit. 1540-1620 OS Migrate update/feedback session https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/yoga-os-migrate Update on new features added to os-migrate, and version/compatibility testing. Tuesday ------- 1310-1350 ceph integration https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-ceph-yoga Plan to remove support for ceph-ansible, and add cephadm ingress with haproxy+keepalived. Upgrade challenges around migrating from PCS to ingress. We also need to keep ceph integration as a priority and proving ground for migration to Directord+task-core. 1405-1445 healthchecks https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-healthchecks-yoga Participation from Sean Mooney from the Nova team to present the proposed solution in Nova. Agreement this would work well for TripleO. We need to continue the collaboration and participate in the pending Nova spec to help drive the healthcheck model. 1500-1540 (HA) Pacemaker brainstorming https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-yoga-pacemaker General consensus is that we still need pacemaker for some tasks. But, we need to evaluate each usage on a case by case basis and migrate services out of pacemaker where there is opportunity. 1540-1620 FIPS Updates & Secret Management https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/yoga-tripleo-fips Plan to go forward with the spec for secret management in TripleO. Wednesday --------- 1310-1350 (CI) tripleo-repos updates https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ci-tripleo-repos Update on tripleo-repos and new functionality (yum config, tripleo-get-hash). Covered ansible integration (for CI). 1405-1445 (CI) Update on CI and centos9 prep work https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/centos-stream-9-upstream Discussed needed CI jobs and CentOS 9 timeline. 1500-1540 Dependency clashes installing branched and non-branches repos in Zuul jobs https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/branched-unbranched-dependency-clashes Discussed limiting the usage of upper constraints as the overall approach. 1540-1620 RDO Releases Agreed that providing the list of last tested hashes to RDO for releases that TripleO doesn't support is sufficient. We reviewed the RDO/TripleO support statement around intermediary releases that TripleO doesn't plan to maintain. https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-website/+/36342 Hackfest ======== The team participated in the hackfest by following through the etherpad at https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-directord-hackfest. Several participants were able to get the environment up. We were able to work through various issues as they arose. Good discussion around UX improvements that are needed, and the apparent benefits for different services due to the dynamic dependencies, job caching, execution time, etc. Also shared the POC of the end to end integration within TripleO. -- -- James Slagle --

1 0

Guest's secondary/virtual IP
by lejeczek 26 Oct '21

26 Oct '21

Hi guys. What I expected turns out not to be enough, must be something trivial - what am I missing? I set a port with --allowed-address and on the instance/guest using the port I did: -> $ ip add add 10.0.1.99/24 dev eth1 yet that IP other guest cannot reach. many thanks, L.

2 2