August 2021 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[cinder] Bug deputy report for week of 2021-11-08
by Sofia Enriquez 11 Aug '21

11 Aug '21

Hello, This is a bug report from 2021-04-08 to 2021-11-08. Agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Incomplete - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1939145 "[IBM Storwize SVC]: use system_id in mkrelationship". Unassigned. Wishlist - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder-tempest-plugin/+bug/1939325 "Add placement service to README". Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder-tempest-plugin/+bug/1939322 " glance registry was deprecated in Queens and should be removed from README". Unassigned. Cheers, -- Sofía Enriquez she/her Software Engineer Red Hat PnT <https://www.redhat.com> IRC: @enriquetaso @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

1 0

[cyborg]Cyborg weekly meeting time slot
by Wang, Xin-ran 11 Aug '21

11 Aug '21

Hi all, I would like to let you know that the now time slot of Cyborg Weekly meeting is 12:00-13:00 UTC. Welcome to join us on https://www.irccloud.com/irc/oftc/channel/openstack-cyborg. Thanks, Xin-Ran Wang

1 0

[all][elections][ptl][tc] Combined PTL/TC Election Season
by helena＠openstack.org 11 Aug '21

11 Aug '21

Election details: [ https://governance.openstack.org/election/ ]( https://governance.openstack.org/election/ ) Hello everyone! The nomination period officially begins August 17, 2021 23:45. Please read the stipulations and timelines for candidates and electorate contained in this governance documentation. The PTL and TC elections for the coming cycle will run concurrently; deadlines for their nomination and voting activities are synchronized but will still use separate ballots. Please note, if only one candidate is nominated as PTL for a project team during the PTL nomination period, that candidate will win by acclaim, and there will be no poll. There will only be a poll if there is more than one candidate stepping forward for a project team's PTL position. If teams do not produce any PTL candidate during the nomination period, or are interested in considering alternatives prior to nominations, the TC may consider requests to switch to the new distributed leadership model they recently documented[1]. In keeping with the established plan[1 ] to gradually reduce the size of the Technical Committee, we will only fill four (4) seats in this coming election. There will be further announcements posted to the mailing list as action is required from the electorate or candidates. This email is for information purposes only. If you have any questions which you feel affect others please reply to this email thread. If you have any questions that you which to discuss in private please email any of the election officials[3] so that we may address your concerns. [1] [ https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20200803-distributed-projec… ]( https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20200803-distributed-projec… ) [2] [ https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/charter.html#number-of-seats-… ]( https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/charter.html#number-of-seats-… ) [3] [ https://governance.openstack.org/election/#election-officials ]( https://governance.openstack.org/election/#election-officials ) Cheers, Helena on behalf of the OpenStack Technical Election Officials

1 0

[OSSA-2021-003] Keystone: Account name and UUID oracles in account locking (CVE-2021-38155)
by Jeremy Stanley 10 Aug '21

10 Aug '21

=============================================================== OSSA-2021-003: Account name and UUID oracles in account locking =============================================================== :Date: August 10, 2021 :CVE: CVE-2021-38155 Affects ~~~~~~~ - Keystone: >=10.0.0 <16.0.2, >=17.0.0 <17.0.1, >=18.0.0 <18.0.1, >=19.0.0 <19.0.1 Description ~~~~~~~~~~~ Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz with Oi Cloud reported a vulnerability affecting Keystone account locking. By guessing the name of an account and failing to authenticate multiple times, any unauthenticated actor could both confirm the account exists and obtain that account's corresponding UUID, which might be leveraged for other unrelated attacks. All Keystone deployments enabling security_compliance.lockout_failure_attempts are affected. Patches ~~~~~~~ - https://review.opendev.org/790444 (Train) - https://review.opendev.org/790443 (Ussuri) - https://review.opendev.org/790442 (Victoria) - https://review.opendev.org/790440 (Wallaby) - https://review.opendev.org/759940 (Xena) Credits ~~~~~~~ - Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz from Oi Cloud (CVE-2021-38155) References ~~~~~~~~~~ - https://launchpad.net/bugs/1688137 - http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-38155 -- Jeremy Stanley

1 0

[TC] [horizon] Project Skyline Timeline
by Kendall Nelson 10 Aug '21

10 Aug '21

Hello All! I would like to introduce you to project Skyline[1]! The team has been hard at work getting it ready for the project proposal stage. While they are not quite ready yet (still working on Zuul testing and devstack integration), I wanted to take a moment and give a little history on conversations in this space and see if there was anything else they needed to do before we actually draft the project proposal. There was a mailing list thread[2] a while back that discussed updating Horizon and what that would look like. I would encourage you to read it if you're interested in the complete history, but it all boils down to a few summaries- Mohammed's[3]: ".... 1. Distributions are happy in the way that Horizon is deployed today 2. Distributions don't want to have a front-end JS based thingamajig 3. Users, operators and deployers want to improve the UI experience of Horizon 4. There is so much _historic_ stuff stuffed into Horizon that rewriting something from scratch is easier than refactoring Horizon 5. The path to improving UI inside OpenStack is "starting from scratch". ...." Adrian's [4]: "...As corny as it sounds, I think the first step is admitting we have a problem, and getting a group of interested parties involved to actually "design/build something better by broadcasting a call to arms of sorts. Radomir's [5]: "The current Horizon developers are not going to do it. We are too busy maintaining the released versions of Horizon and trying to keep up with new features being added to OpenStack, and that situation is unlikely to change for at least several years from now, even if a replacement for Horizon with full feature parity was released tomorrow — we will still need to support the released versions of Horizon. We are happy to help with advice and explanations of how current Horizon implementation works — but we won't write the code. You have to start that project yourself or find other developers willing to work on it, who won't mind you telling them which framework to use." Thierry's[6]: " From the outside of this hypothetical team, the Horizon team says that it will continue to maintain the distro-friendly Django-based Horizon code, and that as a team it has no interest/bandwidth in driving a rewrite internally. That means a new team needs to form up (even if obviously some people can be member of both teams). Now from the outside of this hypothetical new team, the TC can say if it supports the idea of a more-JS-native harder-to-package framework and would gladly add it the list of official OpenStack project teams as an alternative solution to Horizon. That may encourage some to step up." And Akihiro[7] "The current state of horizon is almost in the maintenance mode. We have less contributors release by release. The current horizon team is very small (and horizon cores except one are part-time with other projects or outside of OpenStack upstream), so I don't think the horizon team can lead the effort properly. I think it is better that folks interested in this start an effort to implement OpenStack dashboard in modern technologies for better UX as a separate project (or a separate branch)." Cut to the last PTG[8] when the Skyline folks attended the Horizon sessions to work with the team which you can also catch up. And now, we have the Skyline team working on the last few things (I think) before they are ready to propose it as an OpenStack project. I, for one, am excited to have this infusion of new contributors that can help bring a new OpenStack dashboard into reality. If you have any feedback on other things that need to happen before they can be proposed as a project, please reply! -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo) [1] Repos: https://opendev.org/skyline/ [2] Original thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-June/015551.html [3] Mohammed's summary http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-June/015654.html [4] Adrian's summary http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-June/015659.html [5] Radomir's summary http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-June/015667.html [6] Thierry's summary http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-June/015674.html [7] Akihiro's summary http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-June/015575.htm… [8] PTG Discussion: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-ptg-horizon-planning

1 0

[kolla] Transitioning stable/queens to eol
by Michał Nasiadka 10 Aug '21

10 Aug '21

Hello, We've kept stable/queens branches of kolla and kolla-ansible around under extended maintenance for a while now. The coordinated Queens release was 28th Feb, 2018 (Kolla on 26th Mar, 2018). The last time a change was backported to these branches has been a while: - kolla stable/queens: Jun 8, 2020 - kolla-ansible stable/queens: Nov 3, 2019 There is no CI running for those projects periodically, last CI jobs have been run: - kolla - 24th Aug, 2020 - kolla-ansible - 17th Jun, 2020 All changes to those branches have been abandoned long time (and nothing new proposed for at least a year): https://review.opendev.org/q/branch:stable/queens+project:openstack/kolla https://review.opendev.org/q/branch:stable/queens+project:openstack/kolla-a… So, I'd like to request that these branches be moved to end-of-life. Patch proposed to add EOL tags to both kolla and kolla-ansible: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/803701 -- Michał Nasiadka mnasiadka(a)gmail.com

4 3

[oslo] feature freeze - Aug 23 - Aug 27 (R-6)
by Herve Beraud 10 Aug '21

10 Aug '21

Hello Osloers, Just a friendly reminder that oslo's feature freeze will happen in 2 weeks (R-6 - Aug 23 - Aug 27). It's earlier than everyone else, and if you're wondering why, we have a policy[1] that discusses it. The main thing is that if you have features you want to get into Oslo libraries this cycle, please make sure they merge by Friday. After that we'll need to go through the FFE process and there's no guarantee we can land them. Feel free to ping us on IRC if you need reviews. Thanks for your attention. [1] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/oslo-specs/specs/policy/feature-freeze… -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud

1 0

WIndows VMs exporting toe KVM hosts : Once KVM host fails to boot the VM
by KK CHN 10 Aug '21

10 Aug '21

I am migrating one Windows 12 VM from oVirt hypervisor. The Windows image is a single disk images. I have two KVM hosts running .. I am successfully able to import the VM to one of our KVM host. Windows VM is up and running able to login to the Desktop environment. But the same VM image I am trying in the second KVM host to launch it, its not booting Booting from Hard disk ...... / Its wait in this state for a long ( 20 minutes ) . I tried to delete and create the VM again in the second KVM host, its reaching to Booting from Hard disk .... // No progress after this.. Any suggestions for troubleshooting? . Does I have to execute any utilities and its out put required for trouble shooting let me know. Kris

1 1

[tripleo][collectd][snmp]configuration example
by Tony Liu 10 Aug '21

10 Aug '21

Hi, I am trying to enable SNMP plugin for collected by tripleo. I had some tries, but no luck. Can't figure it out by reading puppet module. Could anyone show me an example to configure a list of "host" and "data" in template? Thanks! Tony

1 0

[cinder] xena R-9 mid-cycle summary available
by Brian Rosmaita 10 Aug '21

10 Aug '21

In case you missed last week's exciting cinder R-9 virtual mid-cycle session, I've posted a summary: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderXenaMidCycleSummary The mid-cycle was recorded; there's a link on the wiki page. Although we're done with midcycles for Xena, the excitement is not over for cinder. There are our regular weekly meetings [1,2] and the August edition of the Festival of XS Reviews [3] is coming up soon. cheers, brian [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/#Cinder_Team_Meeting [2] https://meetings.opendev.org/#Cinder_Bug_Squad_Meeting [3] https://meetings.opendev.org/#Cinder_Festival_of_XS_Reviews

1 0