May 2021 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

Fwd: DPDK+OVS with OpenStack
by Mark Wittling 23 Apr '25

23 Apr '25

Looking for someone who knows OpenStack with OpenVSwitch, and in addition to that, DPDK with OpenStack and OVS.I am using OpenStack Queens, with OpenVSwitch. The architecture I am using is documented here: https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/queens/admin/deploy-ovs-provider.htmlThe OVS I am using on the Compute Node, is compiled with DPDK, and I have enabled the datapath to netdev (DPDK) on br-prv (provider network bridge), and br-tun (tunneling bridge). But these two bridges, br-tun and br-prv, are patched into another OpenStack bridge, called br-int. I wasn’t actually sure about whether to tinker with this bridge, and wondered what datapath it was using.Then, I realized there is a parameter in the openvswitch_agent.ini file, which I will list here: # OVS datapath to use. 'system' is the default value and corresponds to the # kernel datapath. To enable the userspace datapath set this value to 'netdev'. # (string value) # Possible values: # system - <No description provided> # netdev - <No description provided> #datapath_type = system datapath_type = netdev So in tinkering with this, what I realized, is that when you set this datapath_type to system or netdev, it will adjust the br-int bridge to that datapath type.So here is my question. How can I launch a non-DPDK VM, if all of the bridges are using the netdev datapath type?Here is another question. What if one of the flavors don’t have the largepages property set on them? I assumed OpenStack would revert to a system datapath and not use DPDK for those VM interfaces. Well, I found out in testing, that is not the case. If you set all your bridges up for netdev, and you don’t set the property on the Flavor of the VM (largepages), the VM will launch, but it simply won’t work.Is there no way, on a specific Compute Host, to support both DPDK (netdev datapaths) and non-DPDK (system datapaths)?Either on a VM interface level (VM has one interface that is netdev DPDK and another that is system datapath non-DPDK)?Or on a VM by VM basis (VM 1 has 1 or more netdev datapath interfaces and VM 2 has 1 or more system datapath interfaces)?Am I right here? Once you set up a Compute Host for DPDK, it’s DPDK or nothing on that Compute Host? (edited)

3 2

How to config DPDK compute in OVN
by dangerzone ar 22 Apr '25

22 Apr '25

Hi....as far I understand ovs does support dpdk compute to be deployed. I'm referring to the guideline ' *https://docs.openstack.org/networking-ovn/queens/admin/dpdk.html <https://docs.openstack.org/networking-ovn/queens/admin/dpdk.html>* ' ... It's too brief.. May I know how to config dpdk compute in OVN networking openstack? Hope someone could help what is the config to be done.... Currently compute is run without dpdk over openstack train ovn based. Please need some info on how I can proceed. Thank you

2 1

Live migration fails
by Szabo, Istvan (Agoda) 06 Aug '24

06 Aug '24

Hi, I have couple of compute nodes where the live migration fails with existing vms. When I quickly spawn a vm and try live migration it works so I assume shouldn't be a big problem with the compute node. However I have many existing vms where it fails with a servername not found. /var/log/nova/nova-conductor.log:2021-04-21 14:47:12.605 227612 ERROR nova.conductor.tasks.migrate [req-f4067a26-a233-4673-8c07-9a8a290980b0 dce35e6eceea4312bb0baa0510cef363 ca7e35079f4440c78bd9870724b9638b - default default] [instance: 1517a2ac-3b51-4d8d-80b3-89a5614d1ae0] Unable to find record for source node servername on servername: ComputeHostNotFound: Compute host servername could not be found. /var/log/nova/nova-conductor.log:2021-04-21 14:47:12.605 227612 WARNING nova.scheduler.utils [req-f4067a26-a233-4673-8c07-9a8a290980b0 dce35e6eceea4312bb0baa0510cef363 ca7e35079f4440c78bd9870724b9638b - default default] Failed to compute_task_migrate_server: Compute host servername could not be found.: ComputeHostNotFound: Compute host servername could not be found. /var/log/nova/nova-conductor.log:2021-04-21 14:47:12.605 227612 WARNING nova.scheduler.utils [req-f4067a26-a233-4673-8c07-9a8a290980b0 dce35e6eceea4312bb0baa0510cef363 ca7e35079f4440c78bd9870724b9638b - default default] [instance: 1517a2ac-3b51-4d8d-80b3-89a5614d1ae0] Setting instance to ACTIVE state.: ComputeHostNotFound: Compute host servername could not be found. /var/log/nova/nova-conductor.log:2021-04-21 14:47:12.672 227612 ERROR oslo_messaging.rpc.server [req-f4067a26-a233-4673-8c07-9a8a290980b0 dce35e6eceea4312bb0baa0510cef363 ca7e35079f4440c78bd9870724b9638b - default default] Exception during message handling: ComputeHostNotFound: Compute host am-osfecn-4025 Tried with this command: nova live-migration --block-migrate id. Any idea? Thank you. ________________________________ This message is confidential and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by copyright or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply email and delete it from your system. It is prohibited to copy this message or disclose its content to anyone. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost by any mistaken delivery or unauthorized disclosure of the message. All messages sent to and from Agoda may be monitored to ensure compliance with company policies, to protect the company's interests and to remove potential malware. Electronic messages may be intercepted, amended, lost or deleted, or contain viruses.

5 16

[all] Dynamic Zuul results table in Gerrit 3
by Radosław Piliszek 04 Aug '22

04 Aug '22

Hello Fellow OpenStack and OpenDev Folks! TL;DR click on [3] and enjoy. I am starting this thread to not hijack the discussion happening on [1]. First of all, I would like to thank gibi (Balazs Gibizer) for hacking a way to get the place to render the table in the first place (pun intended). I have been a long-time-now user of [2]. I have improved and customised it for myself but never really got to share back the changes I made. The new Gerrit obviously broke the whole script so it was of no use to share at that particular state. However, inspired by gibi's work, I decided to finally sit down and fix it to work with Gerrit 3 and here it comes: [3]. Works well on Chrome with Tampermonkey. Not tested others. I hope you will enjoy this little helper (I do). I know the script looks super fugly but it generally boils down to a mix of styles of 3 people and Gerrit having funky UI rendering. Finally, I'd also like to thank hrw (Marcin Juszkiewicz) for linking me to the original Michel's script in 2019. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/019051… [2] https://opendev.org/x/coats/src/commit/444c95738677593dcfed0cfd9667d4c4f0d5… [3] https://gist.github.com/yoctozepto/7ea1271c299d143388b7c1b1802ee75e Kind regards, -yoctozepto

5 7

Nova not updating to new size of an extended in-use / attached cinder volume (Ceph RBD) to guest
by Christian Rohmann 28 Jun '22

28 Jun '22

Hello Openstack-Discuss, after some digging I found out that cinder learned to resize attached (in-use) volumes quite a while ago with the introduction of the initial "extend 'in-use' volume" feature: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/454287/ The support was then extended to also cover Ceph RBD backed volumes with: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/613039/ Since this is only about the cinder part, I was wondering if nova would ever find out and would actively rescan the device / volume and quintessentially present an increased new size to the guest. Apparently this is where a certain volume-extended event comes into play: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/454322/ that is to be emitted by cinder when a volume had been extened. I then went head and tried this with the openstack cli (as Horizon does not seem to support / offer to resize in-use volumes. I run Openstack Train with Ceph RBD as storage. First I ran into an issue with the openstack cli (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1871759/comments/2 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1871759/comments/2>) but using cinder extend $volumeid $newsize I was able to resize in-use volumes just fine. The only thing missing was the propagation to the guest. I played around with SCSI rescans, but that did not work, reboots also failed to do anyting in this regards. Stopping and starting the VM did work, but why having the capability to online-resize an attached volume when not being able to resize the guest volume as well? Apparently there seems to be an old and somewhat similar observation / bug with https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1369465 So I was simply wondering if this is expected to be working? Are there any special settings / options I need to set to enable this feature? Thanks and with kind regards Christian

4 9

[nova][dev] Revisiting qemu emulation where guest arch != host arch
by Apsey, Christopher 05 Jan '22

05 Jan '22

All, A few years ago I asked a question[1] about why nova, when given a hw_architecture property from glance for an image, would not end up using the correct qemu-system-xx binary when starting the guest process on a compute node if that compute nodes architecture did not match the proposed guest architecture. As an example, if we had all x86 hosts, but wanted to run an emulated ppc guest, we should be able to do that given that at least one compute node had qemu-system-ppc already installed and libvirt was successfully reporting that as a supported architecture to nova. It seemed like a heavy lift at the time, so it was put on the back burner. I am now in a position to fund a contract developer to make this happen, so the question is: would this be a useful blueprint that would potentially be accepted? Most of the time when people want to run an emulated guest they would just nest it inside of an already running guest of the native architecture, but that severely limits observability and the task of managing any more than a handful of instances in this manner quickly becomes a tangled nightmare of networking, etc. I see real benefit in allowing this scenario to run natively so all of the tooling that exists for fleet management 'just works'. This would also be a significant differentiator for OpenStack as a whole. Thoughts? [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2018-August/015653… Chris Apsey Director | Georgia Cyber Range GEORGIA CYBER CENTER 100 Grace Hopper Lane | Augusta, Georgia | 30901 https://www.gacybercenter.org

2 2

[docs] Double headings on every page
by Peter Matulis 04 Nov '21

04 Nov '21

Hi, I'm hitting an oddity in one of my projects where the titles of all pages show up twice. Example: https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/charm-deployment-guide/wall… Source file is here: https://opendev.org/openstack/charm-deployment-guide/src/branch/master/depl… Does anyone see what can be causing this? It appears to happen only for the current stable release ('wallaby') and 'latest'. Thanks, Peter

5 6

Help with eventlet 0.26.1 and dnspython >= 2
by Thomas Goirand 04 Oct '21

04 Oct '21

Hi, As you may know, eventlet is incompatible with dnspython >= 2.0.0.0rc1. See [1] for the details. However, Debian unstable has 2.0.0. Would there be some good soul willing to help me fix this situation? I would need a patch to fix this, but I'm really not sure how to start. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

8 15

[all][tc][goals] Project Specific PTL and Contributor Documentation: Week R-20 Update
by Ghanshyam Mann 17 Sep '21

17 Sep '21

Hello Everyone, As you know, we did not select any community-wide goal for Xena cycle and in PTG, TC decided to spend more time on the previous cycle pending community-wide goal work[1] One of the previous cycle (Ussuri) goals is 'Project Specific PTL and Contributor Documentation' which still not completed by many projects. - https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/ussuri/project-ptl-and-c… I am starting the work to finish this goal which is pretty straight forwards and sending the updates in this ML thread. Please review the patches and merge them or push the patches for your project's repo if not yet done. Gerrit Topic: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22project-ptl-and-contrib-docs%22+(stat… Tracking: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007236 Progress Summary: =============== * Projects completed: 32 * Projects for which patches are up and required to merge those: 10 * Projects for which patches are not yet up: 12 [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-xena-tracker (Item#2) -gmann

2 2

[all]Introduction to venus which is the project of log management and has been contributed to the OpenStack community
by Liye Pang(逄立业) 10 Sep '21

10 Sep '21

Hello everyone, after feedback from a large number of operations and maintenance personnel in InCloud OpenStack, we developed the log management project “Venus” for the OpenStack projects and that has contributed to the OpenStack community. The following is an introduction to “Venus”. If there is interest in the community, we are interested in proposing it to become an official OpenStack project in the future. Background In the day-to-day operation and maintenance of large-scale cloud platform, the following problems are encountered： l Time-consuming for log querying while the server increasing to thousands. l Difficult to retrieve logs, since there are many modules in the platform, e.g. systems service, compute, storage, network and other platform services. l The large amount and dispersion of log make faults are difficult to be discovered. l Because of distributed and interaction between components of the cloud platform, and scattered logs between components, it will take more time to locate problems. About Venus According to the key requirements of OpenStack in log storage, retrieval, analysis and so on, we introduced Venus project, a unified log management module. This module can provide a one-stop solution to log collection, cleaning, indexing, analysis, alarm, visualization, report generation and other needs, which involves helping operator or maintainer to quickly solve retrieve problems, grasp the operational health of the platform, and improve the management capabilities of the cloud platform. Additionally, this module plans to use machine learning algorithms to quickly locate IT failures and root causes, and improve operation and maintenance efficiency. Application scenario Venus played a key role in the following scenarios： l Retrieval: Provide a simple and easy-to-use way to retrieve all log and the context. l Analysis: Realize log association, field value statistics, and provide multi-scene and multi-dimensional visual analysis reports. l Alerts：Convert retrieval into active alerts to realize the error finding in massive logs. l Issue location: Establish a chain relationship and knowledge graphs to quickly locate problems. Overall structure The architecture of log management system based on Venus and elastic search is as follows: Diagram 0: Architecture of Venus venus_api: API module，provide API、rest-api service. venus_manager: Internal timing task module to realize the core functions of the log system. Current progress The current progress of the Venus project is as follows: l Collection：Develop fluentd collection tasks based on collectd to read, filter, format and send plug-ins for OpenStack, operating systems, and platform services, etc. l Index：Dealing with multi-dimensional index data in elasticsearch, and provide more concise and comprehensive authentication interface to return query results. l Analysis：Analyzing and display the related module errors, Mariadb connection errors, and Rabbitmq connection errors. l Alerts：Develop alarm task code to set threshold for the number of error logs of different modules at different times, and provides alarm services and notification services. l Location：Develop the call chain analysis function based on global_requested series, which can show the execution sequence, time and error information, etc., and provide the export operation. l Management：Develop configuration management functions in the log system, such as alarm threshold setting, timing task management, and log saving time setting, etc. Application examples Two examples of Venus application scenarios are as follows. 1. The virtual machine creation operation was performed on the cloud platform and it was found that the virtual machine was not created successfully. First, we can find the request id of the operation and jump to the virtual machine creation call chain page. Then, we can query the calling process, view and download the details of the log of the call. 2. In the cloud platform, the error log of each module can be converted into alarms to remind the users. Further, we can retrieve the details of the error log and error log statistics. Next step The next step of the Venus project is as follows: * Collection：In addition to fluent, other collection plugins such as logstash will be integrated. * Analysis: Explore more operation and maintenance scenarios, and conduct statistical analysis and alarm on key data. * display: The configuration, analysis and alarm of Venus will be integrated into horizon in the form of plugin. * location: Form clustering log and construct knowledge map, and integrate algorithm class library to locate the root cause of the fault. Venus Project Registry Venus library: https://opendev.org/inspur/venus You can grab the source code using the following git command: git clone https://opendev.org/inspur/venus.git Venus Demo Youtu.be: <https://youtu.be/mE2MoEx3awM> https://youtu.be/mE2MoEx3awM

7 15

[interop][cinder] review of next.json (part 2)
by Brian Rosmaita 09 Aug '21

09 Aug '21

Hello Interop WG, The Cinder team completed its discussion of what capabilities should be added as advisory in next.json at yesterday's weekly cinder meeting [0]. The tldr; is that we don't have anything to propose for inclusion in next.json at the present time. The team does have some general questions that would help us determine the suitability of some proposed capabilities. We'd like to invite someone from the Interop WG to the cinder xena R-9 virtual midcycle (Wednesday 4 August 2021, 1400-1600 UTC) so we can discuss this "live". So if someone could put 1400 UTC 4 August on their schedule for a 20 minute discussion, that would be very helpful. cheers, brian [0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2021/cinder.2021-05-12-14.00…

3 8

placement service issue (placement-status upgrade check failure)
by Deepak Mohanty 12 Jul '21

12 Jul '21

I need your help with installation of placement service on Ubuntu 20.04. I have followed the steps in: https://docs.openstack.org/placement/wallaby/install/install-ubuntu.html I am facing the following issue when I try to verify the installation: $ placement-status upgrade check Error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/oslo_upgradecheck/upgradecheck.py", line 196, in run return conf.command.action_fn() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/oslo_upgradecheck/upgradecheck.py", line 104, in check result = func_name(self, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/oslo_upgradecheck/common_checks.py", line 41, in check_policy_json policy_path = conf.find_file(conf.oslo_policy.policy_file) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/oslo_config/cfg.py", line 2543, in find_file raise NotInitializedError() oslo_config.cfg.NotInitializedError: call expression on parser has not been invoked I did a bit of debugging and found that the policy file is: policy.json. I could not find any policy.json on my machine. I created an empty policy.json at: /etc/placement/policy.json (user and group = placement). That too did not work. I have followed the steps in the install guide twice, deleting the placement database and other resources and recreating them. I continue to see the same issue. Thank you for your time.

5 6

[all][infra][qa] Retiring Logstash, Elasticsearch, subunit2sql, and Health
by Clark Boylan 09 Jul '21

09 Jul '21

Hello everyone, Xenial has recently reached the end of its life. Our logstash+kibana+elasticsearch and subunit2sql+health data crunching services all run on Xenial. Even without the distro platform EOL concerns these services are growing old and haven't received the care they need to keep running reliably. Additionally these services represent a large portion of our resource consumption: * 6 x 16 vcpu + 60GB RAM + 1TB disk Elasticsearch servers * 20 x 4 vcpu + 4GB RAM logstash-worker servers * 1 x 2 vcpu + 2GB RAM logstash/kibana central server * 2 x 8 vcpu + 8GB RAM subunit-worker servers * 64GB RAM + 500GB disk subunit2sql trove db server * 1 x 4 vcpu + 4GB RAM health server To put things in perspective, they account for more than a quarter of our control plane servers, occupying over a third of our block storage and in excess of half the total memory footprint. The OpenDev/OpenStack Infra team(s) don't seem to have the time available currently to do the major lifting required to bring these services up to date. I would like to propose that we simply turn them off. All of these services operate off of public data that will not be going away (specifically job log content). If others are interested in taking this on they can hook into this data and run their own processing pipelines. I am sure not everyone will be happy with this proposal. I get it. I came up with the idea for the elasticsearch job log processing way back at the San Diego summit. I spent many many many hours since working to get it up and running and to keep it running. But pragmatism means that my efforts and the team's efforts are better spent elsewhere. I am happy to hear feedback on this. Thank you for your time. Clark

10 13

[Octavia dashboard] Impossible to fill the subnet field when creating a load balancer
by Taltavull Jean-Francois 09 Jul '21

09 Jul '21

Hi All, On my OSA Victoria deployment (on Ubuntu 20.04), the "Create Load Balancer" form does not allow me to fill the mandatory "subnet" field and therefore I can't create a load balancer with Horizon. On the other hand, Octavia works fine and I can create load balancers with the CLI, Terraform, etc. Has one of you already faced such a situation ? Best regards, Jean-François

3 6

[nova] spec review day
by Balazs Gibizer 05 Jul '21

05 Jul '21

Hi, During the today's meeting it came up that we should have a spec review day around M1 (and later one more before M2). As M1 is 27th of May, I propose to do a spec review day on 25th of May, which is a Tuesday. Let me know if the timing does not good for you. The rules are the usual. Let's use this day to focus on open specs, trying to reach agreement on as many thing as possible with close cooperation during the day. Cheers, gibi

1 3

[Swift] Object replication failures on newly upgraded servers
by Mark Kirkwood 30 Jun '21

30 Jun '21

HI, I'm in the process of upgrading a Swift cluster from 2.7/Mitaka to 2.23/Train. While in general it seems to be going well, I'm noticing non-zero object replication failures on the upgraded nodes only, e.g: $ curl http://localhost:6000/recon/replication/object {"replication_last": 1622156911.019487, "replication_stats": {"rsync": 40580, "success": 4141229, "attempted": 2081856, "remove": 4083, "suffix_count": 14960481, "failure": 26550, "hashmatch": 4127197, "failure_nodes": {"10.11.18.67": {"obj08": 2348, "obj09": 60, "obj10": 3030, "obj02": 34, "obj03": 25, "obj01": 44, "obj06": 1498, "obj07": 28, "obj04": 69, "obj05": 36}, "10.11.18.68": {"obj03": 6901, "obj01": 293, "obj06": 1901, "obj04": 10281, "obj10": 1}, "10.12.18.76": {"obj10": 1}}, "suffix_sync": 1785, "suffix_hash": 2778}, "object_replication_last": 1622156911.019487, "replication_time": 1094.7836411476135, "object_replication_time": 1094.7836411476135} Examining the logs (/var/log/swift/object.log and /var/log/syslog) these are not throwing up any red flags (i.e no failing rsyncs noted). Any suggesting about how to get more information about what went wrong e.g: "10.11.18.67": {"obj08": 2348}, how to find what those 2348 errors were? regards Mark P.s: basic sanity checking is ok - uploaded objects go where they should and can be retrieved for 2.7 or 2.23 servers ok (the old and new version servers agree about object placement)

2 4

[tc][all] What should we have as community goals for Y series?( Starting community-wide goals ideas)
by Rico Lin 30 Jun '21

30 Jun '21

Dear all, We're now in R-22 week for Xena cycle which sounds like a perfect time to start calling for community-wide goals ideas for Y-series. According to the goal process schedule [1], we need to find potential goals, and champions before Xena milestone-1 and provide proper discussion in the community right after that to give a clear view and detail on each goal. And if we would like to keep up with the schedule, we should start right away to identify potential goals. So please help to provide ideas for Y series community-wide goals in [2]. Community-wide goals are important in terms of solving and improving a technical area across OpenStack as a whole. It has a lot more benefits to be considered from users as well from a developer's perspective. See [3] for more details about community-wide goals and processes. Also, you can refer to the backlogs of community-wide goals from this[4] and victoria cycle goals[5] (also ussuri[6]). We took cool-down cycle goal step for Xena cycle [7], so no selected goals for Xena. [1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/#goal-selection-schedule [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/y-series-goals [3] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/index.html [4] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/community-goals [5] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-v-series-goals [6] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PVG-u-series-goals [7] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/770616 *Rico Lin* OIF Board director, OpenStack TC, Multi-arch SIG chair, Heat PTL, Senior Software Engineer@EasyStack

10 13

Customization of nova-scheduler
by Levon Melikbekjan 16 Jun '21

16 Jun '21

Hello Openstack team, is it possible to customize the nova-scheduler via Python? If yes, how? Best regards Levon

8 16

[all] CRITICAL: Upcoming changes to the OpenStack Community IRC this weekend
by Ghanshyam Mann 15 Jun '21

15 Jun '21

Greetings contributors & community members! With recent events, the Technical Committee held an emergency meeting today (Wednesday, May 26th, 2021) regarding Freenode IRC and what our decision would be [1]. Earlier in the week, the consensus amongst the TC was to gather more information from the individual projects, and make a decision from there[2]. With #rdo, #ubuntu, and #wikipedia having been hijacked, the consensus amongst the TC and the community members who were able to attend the meeting was to move away from Freenode as soon as possible. The TC agreed that this move away from Freenode needs to be a community-wide move to the same, new IRC network for all projects to avoid splintering of the community. As has been long-planned in the event of a contingency, we will be moving to OFTC. We recognize this is a contentious topic, and ultimately we seek to ensure community continuity before evolution to something beyond IRC, as many have expressed interest in doing via Mailing List discussions. At this point, we had to make a decision to solve the immediate problem in the simplest and most expedient way possible, so this is that announcement. We welcome continued discussion about future alternatives on the other threads. With this in mind, we suggest the following steps. Everyone: ======= 1. Do NOT change any channel topics to represent this change. This is likely to result in the channel being taken over by Freenode and will disrupt communications within our community. 2. Register your nicknames on OFTC [3][4] 3. Be *prepared* to join your channels on OFTC[4]. The OpenStack community channels have already been registered on OFTC and await you. 4. Continue to use Freenode for OpenStack discussions until the bots have been moved and the official cut-over takes place this coming weekend. We anticipate using OFTC starting Monday, May 31st. Projects/Project Leaders: ==================== 1. Projects should work to get a few volunteers to staff their project channels on Freenode, for the near future to help redirect people to OFTC. This should occur via private messages to avoid a ban. 2. Continue to hold project meetings on Freenode until the bots are enabled on OFTC. 3. Update project wikis/documentation with the new IRC network information. We ask that you consider referring to the central contributor guide[5]. 4. The TC is asking that projects take advantage of this time of change to consider moving project meetings from the #openstack-meeting* channels to their project channel. 5. Please avoid discussing the move to OFTC in Freenode channels as this may also trigger a takeover of the channel. We are working on getting our bots over to OFTC, and they will be moved over the weekend. Starting Monday May 31, the bots will be on OFTC. Communication regarding this migration will take place on OFTC[4] in #openstack-dev, and we're working on updating the contributor guide[5] to reflect this migration. Sincerely, The OpenStack TC and community leaders who came together to agree on a path forward. [1]: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-irc [2]: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/feedback-on-freenode [3]: https://www.oftc.net/Services/#register-your-account [4]: https://www.oftc.net/ [5]: https://docs.openstack.org/contributors/common/irc.html

3 6

[all][stable] Ocata - End of Life
by Előd Illés 09 Jun '21

09 Jun '21

Hi, Sorry, this will be long :) as there are 3 topics around old stable branches and 'End of Life'. 1. Deletion of ocata-eol tagged branches With the introduction of Extended Maintenance process [1][2] some cycles ago, the 'End of Life' (EOL) process also changed: * branches were no longer EOL tagged and "mass-deleted" at the end of maintenance phase * EOL'ing became a project decision * if a project decides to cease maintenance of a branch that is in Extended Maintenance, then they can tag their branch with $series-eol However, the EOL-tagging process was not automated or redefined process-wise, so that meant the branches that were tagged as EOL were not deleted. Now (after some changing in tooling) Release Management team finally will start to delete EOL-tagged branches. In this mail I'm sending a *WARNING* to consumers of old stable branches, especially *ocata*, as we will start deleting the *ocata-eol* tagged branches in a *week*. (And also newer *-eol branches later on) 2. Ocata branch Beyond the 1st topic we must clarify the future of Ocata stable branch in general: tempest jobs became broken about ~ a year ago. That means that projects had two ways forward: a. drop tempest testing to unblock gate b. simply don't support ocata branch anymore As far as I see the latter one happened and stable/ocata became unmaintained probably for every projects. So my questions are regarding this: * Is any project still using/maintaining their stable/ocata branch? * If not: can Release Team initiate a mass-EOL-tagging of stable/ocata? 3. The 'next' old stable branches Some projects still support their Pike, Queens and Rocky branches. These branches use Xenial and py2.7 and both are out of support. This results broken gates time to time. Especially nowadays. These issues suggest that these branches are closer and closer to being unmaintained. So I call the attention of interested parties, who are for example still consuming these stable branches and using them downstream to put effort on maintaining the branches and their CI/gates. It is a good practice for stable maintainers to check if there are failures in their projects' periodic-stable jobs [3], as those are good indicators of the health of their stable branches. And if there are, then try to fix it as soon as possible. [1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20180301-stable-branch-eol.… [2] https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#maintena… [3] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-stable-maint/2021-April/date… Thanks, Előd

1 2

[Neutron] sriov network setup for victoria - clarification needed
by forums＠mossakowski.ch 09 Jun '21

09 Jun '21

Hello, I have two victoria environments: 1) a working one, standard setup with separate dedicated interface for sriov (pt0 and pt1) 2) a broken one, where I'm trying to reuse one of already used interfaces (ens2f0 or ens2f1) for sriov. ens2f0 is used for several VLANs (mgmt and storage) and ens2f1 is a neutron external interface which I bridged for VLAN tenant networks. On both I have enabled 63 VFs, it's a standard intetl 10Gb x540 adapter. On broken environment, when I'm trying to boot a VM with sriov port that I created before, I see this error shown on below gist: https://gist.github.com/moss2k13/8e6272cbe7748b2c5210fab291360e0b I'm investigating this for couple days now but I'm out of ideas so I'd like to ask for your support. Is this possible to achieve what I'm trying to do on 2nd environment? To use PF as normal interface and use its VFs for sriov-agent at the same time? Regards, Piotr Mossakowski

3 5

[neutron][interop][refstack] New tests and capabilities to track in interop
by Martin Kopec 07 Jun '21

07 Jun '21

Hi everyone, I would like to further discuss the topics we covered with the neutron team during the PTG [1]. * adding address_group API capability It's tested by tests in neutron-tempest-plugin. First question is if tests which are not directly in tempest can be a part of a non-add-on marketing program? It's possible to move them to tempest though, by the time we do so, could they be marked as advisory? * Shall we include QoS tempest tests since we don't know what share of vendors enable QoS? Could it be an add-on? These tests are also in neutron-tempest-plugin, I assume we're talking about neutron_tempest_plugin.api.test_qos tests. If we want to include these tests, which program should they belong to? Do we wanna create a new one? [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/neutron-xena-ptg Thanks, -- Martin Kopec Senior Software Quality Engineer Red Hat EMEA

4 8

Fwd: [ironic] IPA image does not want to boot with UEFI
by Vuk Gojnic 03 Jun '21

03 Jun '21

Hi Julia, thanks for the response. I have now verified that the server has Secure Boot set to Disabled. It happens on all our HPE Gen10 and Gen10+ servers that are booting with UEFI in the same configuration (Secure Boot Disabled). Unsigned initrd from ubuntu for example works with Kernel from IPA: I have also updated firmware of the server to the latest version, but it is still the same. I am going to try to drill deeper in IPA builder code and IPA initrd which seems not to go well with UEFI boot mode. I am grateful for any hint. Bests, Vuk

3 7

[Manila ] Upcoming Bug Squash starting June 7th through June 11th 2021
by Vida Haririan 03 Jun '21

03 Jun '21

Hi everyone, As discussed, a new Bug Squash event is around the corner! The event will be held from 7th to 11th June, 2021, providing an extended contribution window. There will be a synchronous call held simultaneously on IRC, Thursday June 10th, 2021 at 15:00 UTC and we will use this Jitsi bridge [1]. A list of selected bugs will be shared here [2]. Please feel free to add any additional bugs you would like to address during the event. Thanks for your participation in advance. Vida [1] https://meetpad.opendev.org/ManilaX-ReleaseBugSquash [2] https://ethercalc.openstack.org/i3vwocrkk776 <https://meetpad.opendev.org/ManilaX-ReleaseBugSquash> <https://meetpad.opendev.org/ManilaX-ReleaseBugSquash>

2 1

[kolla] Reorganization of kolla-ansible documentation
by Klemen Pogacnik 03 Jun '21

03 Jun '21

Hello! I promised to prepare my view as a user of kolla-ansible on its documentation. In my opinion the division between admin guides and user guides is artificial, as the user of kolla-ansible is actually the cloud administrator. Maybe it would be good to think about reorganizing the structure of documentation. Many good chapters are already written, they only have to be positioned in the right place to be found more easily. So here is my proposal of kolla-ansible doc's structure: 1. Introduction 1.1. mission 1.2. benefits 1.3. support matrix 2. Architecture 2.1. basic architecture 2.2. HA architecture 2.3. network architecture 2.4. storage architecture 3. Workflows 3.1. preparing the surroundings (networking, docker registry, ...) 3.2. preparing servers (packages installation) 3.3. configuration (of kolla-ansible and description of basic logic for configuration of Openstack modules) 3.4. 1st day procedures (bootstrap, deploy, destroy) 3.5. 2nd day procedures (reconfigure, upgrade, add, remove nodes ...) 3.6. multiple regions 3.7. multiple cloud 3.8. security 3.9. troubleshooting (how to check, if cloud works, what to do, if it doesn't) 4. Use Cases 4.1. all-in-one 4.2. basic vm multinode 4.3. some production use cases 5. Reference guide Mostly the same structure as already is. Except it would be desirable that description of each module has: - purpose of the module - configuration of the module - how to use it with links to module docs - basic troubleshooting 6. Contributor guide The documentation also needs figures, pictures, diagrams to be more understandable. So at least in the first chapters some of them shall be added. I'm also thinking about convergence of documentation of kayobe, kolla and kolla-ansible projects. It's true that there's no strict connection between kayobe and other two and kolla containers can be used without kolla-ansible playbooks. But the real benefit the user can get is to use all three projects together. But let's leave that for the second phase. So please comment on this proposal. Do you think it's going in the right direction? If yes, I can refine it.

2 2

[TripleO] tripleo repos going Extended Maintenance stable/train OK? (not yet IMO)
by Marios Andreou 03 Jun '21

03 Jun '21

Hello TripleO o/ per [1] and the proposal at [2] the stable/train branch for all tripleo repos [3] is going to transition to extended maintenance [4]. Once [2] merges, we can still merge things to stable/train but it means we can no longer make official openstack tagged releases for stable/train. TripleO is a trailing project so if we want to hold on this for a while longer I think that is OK and that would also be my personal preference. >From a quick check just now e.g. tripleo-heat-templates @ [5] and at current time there are 87 commits since last September which isn't a tiny amount. So I don't think TripleO is ready to declare stable/train as extended maintenance, but perhaps I am wrong, what do you think? Please comment here or directly at [2] if you prefer regards, marios [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022287.html [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/790778/2#message-e981f749… [3] https://releases.openstack.org/teams/tripleo.html#train [4] https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#maintena… [5] https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/compare/11.5.0...stable…

2 3

[kolla] [kolla-ansible] fluentd doesn't forward OpenStack logs to Elasticsearch
by Bernd Bausch 03 Jun '21

03 Jun '21

I might have found a bug in Kolla-Ansible (Victoria version) but don't know where to file it. This is about central logging. In my installation, none of the interesting logs (Nova, Cinder, Neutron...) are sent to Elasticsearch. I confirmed that using tcpdump. I found that fluentd's config file /etc/kolla/fluentd/td-agent.conf tags these logs with "kolla.*". But later in the file, one finds filters like this: # Included from conf/filter/01-rewrite-0.14.conf.j2: <match kolla.var.log.kolla.*.*.log> @type rewrite_tag_filter capitalize_regex_backreference yes ... <rule> key programname pattern ^(nova-api|nova-compute|nova-compute-ironic|nova-conductor|nova-manage|nova-novncproxy|nova-scheduler|nova-placement-api|placement-api|privsep-helper)$ tag openstack_python </rule> If I understand this right, this basically re-tags all nova logs with "openstack_python". The same config file has an output rule at the very end. I think the intention is to make this a catch-all rule (or "match anything else"): # Included from conf/output/01-es.conf.j2: <match *.**> @type copy <store> @type elasticsearch host 192.168.122.209 port 9200 scheme http etc. Unfortunately, the /openstack_python/ tag doesn't match /*.**/, since it contains no dot. I fixed this with <match **>. Now I receive all logs, but I am not sure if this is the right way to fix it. The error, if it is one, is in https://opendev.org/openstack/kolla-ansible/src/branch/master/ansible/roles…. If you want me to file a bug, please let me know how. Bernd.

2 3

[largescale-sig] Next meeting: June 2, 15utc
by Thierry Carrez 03 Jun '21

03 Jun '21

Hi everyone, Our next Large Scale SIG meeting will be this Wednesday in #openstack-meeting-3 on OFTC IRC, at 15UTC. You can doublecheck how it translates locally at: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20210602T15 Note that we changed IRC networks, you should now connect to OFTC[1] rather than Freenode servers. [1] https://www.oftc.net/ A number of topics have already been added to the agenda, including discussing our next OpenInfra.Live show. Feel free to add other topics to our agenda at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting Regards, -- Thierry Carrez

1 1

Re: [Nova] Meeting time poll
by Sam Su (苏正伟) 01 Jun '21

01 Jun '21

0 *H÷ 010 +0 *H÷ $>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, Nova team£º There are many asian developers for Openstack community. I found the current IRC time of Nova is not friendly to them, especially to East Asian. If they can take part in the IRC meeting, the Nova may have more developers. Of cource, Central Europe and NA West Coast is firstly considerable. If the team could schedule the meeting once per month, time suitable for asians, more people would participate in the meeting discussion. -----ÓÊŒþÔŒþ----- ·¢ŒþÈË: Artom Lifshitz [mailto:alifshit@redhat.com] ·¢ËÍÊ±Œä: 2021Äê5ÔÂ14ÈÕ 1:07 ÊÕŒþÈË: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org> Ö÷Ìâ: [Nova] Meeting time poll hem Hey all, As discussed during the IRC meeting today, the Red Hat Nova team would like to know if it's possible to shift the IRC meeting to a different day and/or time. This would facilitate our own internal calls, but I want to be very clear that we'll structure our internal calls around upstream, not the other way around. So please do not perceive any pressure to change, this is just a question :) To help us figure this out, I've created a Doodle poll [1]. I believe the regular attendees of the IRC meeting are spread between Central Europe and NA West Coast, so I've tried to list times that kinda make sense in both of those places, with a couple of hours on each side as a safety margin. Please vote on when you'd like the Nova IRC meeting to take place. Ignore the actual dates (like May 10), the important bits are the days of the week (Monday, Tuesday, etc). This is obviously a recurring meeting, something that Doodle doesn't seem to understand. I've not included Mondays and Wednesdays in the list of possibilities, as they would not work for Red Hat Nova. You can also vote to keep the status quo :) The times are listed in UTC, like the current meeting time, so unfortunately you have to be mindful of the effects of daylight savings time :( Thanks in advance! [1] https://doodle.com/poll/45ptnyn85iuw7pxz E0¢0 cÊR,S8vMÂä:ÐVê0 *H÷ 0Y10 &ò,dcom10 &ò,dlangchao10 &ò,dhome10U INSPUR-CA0 170109092830Z 270109093829Z0Y10 &ò,dcom10 &ò,dlangchao10 &ò,dhome10U INSPUR-CA0"0 *H÷ 0 «ä5ïc$Œ©æ'µ¯Þ6>úUKÛdÔ²Áe9Î~{BîÒLgD÷*wvVÊŠ/DýUj_xá\m/ óž=kÐ·éGÙœQ€ýx~Wùgk ÛÜøãÔ7É6NçÏ*?n°Ê²mhùè{Ã¯ôÌÆ 7üF-Î<@ÃÓÍ¬WçÅyåLZrF 6~føÈ×T~$0d¡ýL|zšøW=ötÚ%ýq,¥Ã~Ÿ"ÀýŸÑö2T,QÕÔ,dºÂÅ^§ÈôïåJ)ëVvp Ó£f0d0 +7CA0U0Uÿ0ÿ0U^YŠŽLX`Nöµ¥9Š2Á5j0 +70 *H÷ JÄß»íu+¶Wù«áMÈL¯i8y1ü'áRæL€uK·u`K=9@žnA0×ŠqÓÂéÑVxÓf Ý»Åü<ÔUrpŠz¶Ï7vèÑ¥`oñ÷7Ä°ù¬?Þ`PMKŠžp»9 ìcwg UhÁþuu|6~ŒÁècŸŸkl!êkMÔS3B±Æù¯:«ççA^5"ÆX¯ èË&á)PNäŒØkäA-7fGR,¿äŸœÞ}ÖfeKéK¥[ H¢WžÓ{oÊù ,F_5°ÎZË>u00 ~a"Ã'pMÊsa"0 *H÷ 0Y10 &ò,dcom10 &ò,dlangchao10 &ò,dhome10U INSPUR-CA0 190606032704Z 240604032704Z010 &ò,dcom10 &ò,dlangchao10 &ò,dhome10Uæµªæœ®ä¿¡æ¯10U èæ£äŒ1$0" *H÷ suzhengwei@inspur.com0"0 *H÷ 0 ÏþOªdbñ3S©ÁPf~°Š(ÒóÙéáœö»sÉÐ»¹w»#žŽý;Fqt$â MÓBß€]¡MhžR=IIPXHŠîÃ<F¶ÚI¥Ñ3Oåå£1 éêi²LÕŸ8 ·Ëì7NOH|µ<M³õÚá ±®åÙ@üì€® ·²)ŒYŸ'1~ðäHŠç«\Æ§è~\¬º}¥os:õàÕ48IM"ÌÀ÷Z\|pÉ'Âpl;ççµeŠÈÜlªéYØw1¡~¡ðKäpåAøNšu!Ä}£00= +700.&+7ò©×z©=÷Ø\Jý&§Md\0)U%"0 ++ +7 0U 05 +7 (0&0 +0 +0 +7 0D *H÷ 7050*H÷ 0*H÷ 0+0 *H÷ 0UÉÈ¿ñY-ŸŒ°ÕŸf7Uv€0U#0^YŠŽLX`Nöµ¥9Š2Á5j0ÑUÉ0Æ0Ã À œºldap:///CN=INSPUR-CA,CN=JTCA2012,CN=CDP,CN=Public%20Key%20Services,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=home,DC=langchao,DC=com?certificateRevocationList?base?objectClass=cRLDistributionPoint0Ä+·0Ž0±+0€ldap:///CN=INSPUR-CA,CN=AIA,CN=Public%20Key%20Services,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=home,DC=langchao,DC=com?cACertificate?base?objectClass=certificationAuthority0GU@0> % +7 suzhengwei@inspur.comsuzhengwei@inspur.com0 *H÷ ÊÃæÖñâ5ð+Éý,¬°Ü3zþdŸšÒMÚ¹Úxæ¥¹ÛHBœTfBUâ_lfÓ:.#§mK"§ÈL¹ç[Ç¿5FezK>6yÎP®)iÑ65k\&\v"³ÓÃäzKÇ S]*ÊO)§RÅþdãÖñN2üGç#v&4.$¯U»±[*3'NZfºÒ%åsÓå<"ù9¹{§ÌçÛîf7¶ùãÖ² ÞÌ-ÚÃñêfP!ï$JÑG£Cor°\S×AEzÙkÈšÖóB¯Lá!Öñ100p0Y10 &ò,dcom10 &ò,dlangchao10 &ò,dhome10U INSPUR-CA~a"Ã'pMÊsa"0 + ø0 *H÷ 1 *H÷ 0 *H÷ 1 210514012326Z0# *H÷ 1ŸÂÕ¶T0DóüÑµ¶80 +71r0p0Y10 &ò,dcom10 &ò,dlangchao10 &ò,dhome10U INSPUR-CA~a"Ã'pMÊsa"0*H÷ 1r p0Y10 &ò,dcom10 &ò,dlangchao10 &ò,dhome10U INSPUR-CA~a"Ã'pMÊsa"0 *H÷ 100 `He*0 `He0 *H÷ 0 `He0*H÷ 0 *H÷ @0+0 `He0 `He0 `He0 *H÷ «ä-7X×òÍ O05xÍh6÷ŽÔ?îk6è{îI®pq¯¯øQì¬°âmª¿%m<<Uv«d\ígt?)ÁJçá3S©å íL£&Îžð,°& h{stuCÃKÈ5=ÒvéqjórÝ^ç€ 1ºéT£Õn·rÈ£g&:2Ø)=C'SW>XËÄ âá{ a9[l}a=QÂ}7žR"È¹²8Üij Ÿ& l£·;Ÿ¹ö÷a4ó8Hv×{\#ª0&II¹¡ëžP%O2®jª?Â,HçôF

2 5

[requirements][docs] sphinx and docutils major version update
by Matthew Thode 01 Jun '21

01 Jun '21

Looks like a major version update came along and broke things. I'd appreciate if some docs people could take a look at https://review.opendev.org/793022 Thanks, -- Matthew Thode

2 1

[docs] Request to clean up reviewers on openstack-doc-core and openstack-contributor-guide-core
by Julia Kreger 01 Jun '21

01 Jun '21

Greetings, I went to go hunt down a reviewer for the contributors guide this morning and found that at least one of the reviewers no longer works on OpenStack. In this case pkovar, but just glancing at the group lists, there appears to be others. If someone with appropriate privileges could update the group memberships to better reflect reality, it would be helpful to the rest of the community. Thanks! -Julia

5 5

Question regarding the production status of DB2 in Trove
by Bekir Fajkovic 31 May '21

31 May '21

Hello! One question regarding the development status of DB2 inside Trove. I see that DB2 is still in experimental phase, when could it be expected for that datastore type to get production ready status? Best Regards. Bekir Fajkovic Senior DBA Mobile: +46 70 019 48 47 www.citynetwork.eu | www.citycloud.com INNOVATION THROUGH OPEN IT INFRASTRUCTURE ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 CERTIFIED

3 8

[sdk]: Block storage resource get volume created at time
by dmeng 31 May '21

31 May '21

Hello there, Hope this email finds you well. I have a question for getting the volume created at time using the openstacksdk block storage volume class. I found that the attribute volume.create_at is in a format like "2021-05-28T17:16:45.000000", and we don't know the timezone for it. Wondering if the openstack always uses the GMT? or anywhere we could set it to our pacific time? Thanks and have a great day! Catherine

1 0

[puppet] Moved #puppet-openstack from Freenode to OFTC
by Tobias Urdin 31 May '21

31 May '21

Hello Puppeters! Just a friendly reminder that we have moved #puppet-openstack from Freenode to OFTC. Best regards

1 0

[oslo] Weekly meeting moving to OFTC next week
by Herve Beraud 31 May '21

31 May '21

Hello, Just a friendly reminder to inform all the Osloers that OpenStack IRC has moved from freenode to OFTC during the past weekend. So henceforward our weekly team meeting will be at OFTC network, on the same channel (#openstack-oslo) as it was previously at Freenode. If anyone has yet to register on OFTC then kindly do so as soon as possible. Don't forget that meetings are now scheduled the first and the third Monday of each month [1]. So, see you there during our next meeting on Monday 03 June. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-April/022124.ht… -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+ Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+ RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0 qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3 B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o =ECSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

[glance] Weekly meeting moving to OFTC from this week
by Abhishek Kekane 31 May '21

31 May '21

Hello Everyone, Everyone is aware that OpenStack IRC has moved from freenode to OFTC during the past weekend. So henceforward our weekly team meeting will be at OFTC network, on the same channel (#openstack-meeting) as it was previously at Freenode. If anyone has yet to register on OFTC then kindly do so as soon as possible. Thanks & Best Regards, Abhishek Kekane

1 0

[neutron] Meetings are moving to OFTC this week
by Slawek Kaplonski 31 May '21

31 May '21

Hi, OpenStack moved to the OFTC IRC channels already so starting this week our team meeting, CI meeting and drivers meeting will be at OFTC server, on same channels as it was previously at Freenode. -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

1 0

[requirements][neutron][os-vif][octavia] pyroute2 and eventlet update breaking gate
by Matthew Thode 31 May '21

31 May '21

looks like more updates to bother you about. pyroute2 review is at https://review.opendev.org/793020 eventlet review is at https://review.opendev.org/793021 It looks like this is mainly impacting neutron related projects -- Matthew Thode

4 5

[nova] Next nova meeting will be already on OFTC
by Balazs Gibizer 31 May '21

31 May '21

Hi, The next weekly meeting on 1st of June will be held already on the OFTC IRC servers, in the #openstack-meeting-3 channel. Cheers, gibi

1 0

[neutron] Bug deputy report - week of May 24th
by Slawek Kaplonski 31 May '21

31 May '21

Hi, I was bug deputy last week. Here is my report regarding bugs from it: **critical** https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1929518 - Functional db migration tests broken - assigned, patch proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1929633 - Mechanism driver 'ovn' failed in create_port_precommit: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'chassis_exists' - Issue related to switch ovn to be default neutron's backend in devstack, in progress **high** https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1929523 - Test tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_subnet_details is failing from time to time - Unassigned https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1929832 - stable/ussuri py38 support for keepalived-state-change monitor - In progress https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1930222 - "test_add_and_remove_metering_label_rule_src_and_dest_ip_only" failing in py39 , in progress **medium** https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1929438 - Cannot provision flat network after reconfiguring physical bridges - assigned, patch already proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1929578 - Make OVN metadata agent OVNDB read-only - assigned, patch proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1929676 - API extensions not supported by e.g. OVN driver may still be on the list returned from neutron - assigned, patch proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1930195 - Bump os-ken to 2.0.0 - in progress **Low** https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1929658 - [OVN] Enable OVN L3 router plugin support for filter-validation - assigned, fix proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1929821 - [dvr] misleading fip rule priority not found error message - unassigned https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1929998 - VXLAN interface cannot source from lo with multiple IPs - assigned... **undecided** https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1930096 - Missing static routes after neutron-l3-agent restart - waiting for some info... **RFE** https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1930200 - [RFE] Add support for Node- Local virtual IP, -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

1 0

[masakari] Tomorrow meeting will be on OFTC
by Radosław Piliszek 31 May '21

31 May '21

Dears, Please be informed that we, as OpenStack community, have migrated our IRC presence to OFTC. Hence, the Masakari meetings, starting with the tomorrow one, will be held on #openstack-masakari on OFTC. Please find OFTC connection info on http://www.oftc.net/ Kind regards, -yoctozepto

1 0

[release] Release countdown for week R-18, May 31 - Jun 04
by Herve Beraud 30 May '21

30 May '21

Development Focus ----------------- We are now past the Xena-1 milestone. Teams should now be focused on feature development! General Information ------------------- Our next milestone in this development cycle will be Xena-2, on 15 July, 2021. This milestone is when we freeze the list of deliverables that will be included in the Xena final release, so if you plan to introduce new deliverables in this release, please propose a change to add an empty deliverable file in the deliverables/xena directory of the openstack/releases repository. Now is also generally a good time to look at bugfixes that were introduced in the master branch that might make sense to be backported and released in a stable release. If you have any questions around the OpenStack release process, feel free to ask on this mailing-list or on the #openstack-release channel on IRC (at OFTC). Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- Xena-2 Milestone: 15 July, 2021 -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+ Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+ RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0 qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3 B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o =ECSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Pack Stack Install Issue on CentOS 7.
by Ken.Germann＠L3Harris.com 30 May '21

30 May '21

I removed mariadb-server, mariadb-client, mariadb-compat and mariadb-common. I run packstack -answer-file=answer.conf I get this error message: ERROR : Error appeared during Puppet run: 192.245.72.101_controller.pp Error: Execution of '/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install mariadb-server-galera' returned 1: Package 3:mariadb-server-10.3.20-3.el7.0.0.rdo1.x86_64 is obsoleted by MariaDB-server-10.5.10-1.el7.centos.x86_64 which is already installed You will find full trace in log /var/tmp/packstack/20210527-170042-RiVtzU/manifests/192.245.72.101_controller.pp.log Any ideas how I work around this issue? Thank You, Ken Germann UNAP IRAD System Administrator Lead Aviation Systems / l3HARRIS Technologies Office: +1-954-732-0391 / Mobile: +1-954-732-0391 l3harris.com<mailto:l3harris.com> / kgermann(a)l3harris.com<mailto:kgermann@l3harris.com> MS F-11A / 1025 W. Nasa Dr. / Melbourne, FL 32919 / USA [rsz_1harriswebpage_rotator] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain material that is proprietary, confidential, privileged or otherwise legally protected or restricted under applicable government laws. Any review, disclosure, distributing or other use without expressed permission of the sender is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies without reading, printing, or saving.

3 2

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary 28th May, 21: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 28 May '21

28 May '21

Hello Everyone, Here is last week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. What we completed this week: ========================= * Community Infra ELK services help has been added in 2021 Upstream Investment Opportunity[1]. * It is decided to move the IRC network from Freenode to OFTC[2]. 2. TC Meetings: ============ * TC held this week meeting on Thursday; you can find the full meeting logs in the below link: - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-05-27-15.00.log.html * We will have next week's meeting on June 3rd, Thursday 15:00 UTC[3]. 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for Xena cycle ------------------------------ TC is using the etherpad[4] for Xena cycle working item. We will be checking and updating the status biweekly in the same etherpad. Open Reviews ----------------- * Three open reviews for ongoing activities[5]. Nomination is open for the 'Y' release naming ------------------------------------------------------ * Y release naming process is started[6]. Nomination is open until June 10th feel free to propose names in below wiki ** https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Naming/Y_Proposals Replacing ATC terminology with AC (Active Contributors) ------------------------------------------------------------------- * As UC is merged into TC, this is to include the AUC into ATC so that they can be eligible for TC election voting. We are having a good amount of discussion on Gerrit[7], feel free to review the patch if you have any points regarding this. * In the last TC meeting, we will write a TC resolution to map the ATC with the new term AC from Bylaws' perspective. Retiring sushy-cli -------------------- * Ironic project is retiring the sushy-cli[8] MIgration from Freenode to OFTC ----------------------------------------- * TC held an emergency meeting on Wednesday, May 26th, 2021 and decided to move the IRC network from Freenode to OFTC[9]. You can find the detailed discussion in etherpad[10]. * We are also adding it as TC resolution[11]. * Next step will be communicated on ML thread, please join the channel on OFTC network. * We updated the minimum guide for how to join in OFTC in the contributor guide[12] 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[13]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15 UTC [14] 3. Office hours: The Technical Committee offers a weekly office hour every Tuesday at 0100 UTC [15] 4. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/upstream-investment-opportuni… [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022718.html [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [4] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-xena-tracker [5] https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/governance+status:open [6] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022383.html [7] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/790092 [8] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/792348 [9] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022718.html [10] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-irc [11] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/793260 [12] https://docs.openstack.org/contributors/common/irc.html [13] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [14] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting [15] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Office_hours -gmann

1 0

[interop] Interop Testing Guidelines
by Jimmy McArthur 28 May '21

28 May '21

Hi all - I noticed that the most recent testing guidelines [1] are from 2016. Is there a plan to update those to the 2020 guidelines? They still mention Chris Hoge, who is no longer in the community, and I'm assuming the guidelines there are outdated as well. Cheers, Jimmy https://opendev.org/osf/interop/src/branch/master/2016.08/procedure.rst

4 8

[ops] ops meetups team resuming meetings **NEW LOCATION**
by Chris Morgan 28 May '21

28 May '21

We'll meet briefly next Tuesday 2021-6-6 on irc.oftc.net at 10am EST in #openstack-operators Agenda https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ops-meetups-team Chris -- Chris Morgan <mihalis68(a)gmail.com>

2 2

[requirements][keystone] sqlalchemy-1.4 update seems to impact keystone gate
by Matthew Thode 28 May '21

28 May '21

If someone from the keystone team can take a look that'd be helpful, thanks :D review is at https://review.opendev.org/788339 -- Matthew Thode

2 1

[ussuri][tripleo]
by Ruslanas Gžibovskis 28 May '21

28 May '21

Hi all, I am running deployment with TripleO. receiving error: Stack rsw/88b97419-3db1-4dac-b104-44544a044a59 UPDATE_FAILED rsw.Compute.0.Compute: resource_type: OS::TripleO::ComputeServer physical_resource_id: 613f907a-450a-48b5-995f-aa33f46d2092 status: CREATE_FAILED status_reason: | ResourceInError: resources.Compute: Went to status ERROR due to "Message: No valid host was found. , Code: 500" real 26m6.790s user 4m9.877s sys 0m32.829s meanwhile, while it is running, I see that it is booting up, loading pxe image successfully, later undercloud initiates communication on 9999 port to ironic agent listening on compute. after that it just fails deployment. I have checked containers/nova/nova-conductor.log and found interesting line, which I have preformated to see error: http://paste.openstack.org/show/idc7RcrUuMuNMkvoopxF/ which refers me to image building... Now I am building images with: http://paste.openstack.org/show/805786/ previously, I was facing this error with misconfigured elements of image, but now it should be set according to default files. does anyone have an idea, where I could try looking at to fix this issue? thank you -- Ruslanas Gžibovskis +370 6030 7030

1 1

[requirements][keystone] Werkzeug major update has gate implications
by Matthew Thode 27 May '21

27 May '21

Werkzeug had a major update that seems to break keystone gating. I'd appreciate it if someone from the keystone team could take a look at https://review.opendev.org/793022 Thanks, -- Matthew Thode

1 1

server/instance and ssh keys
by Mauricio Tavares 27 May '21

27 May '21

Is there a way to query openstack about which ssh pubkey was used with a given server?

2 3