>From a purely documentation and explanatory standpoint I vote for "project", if we're going to standardize on one or the other. On Nov 23, 2013 7:13 AM, "Christopher Yeoh" <cbkyeoh at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > So in the past we've used both tenant and project to refer to the same > thing and I think its been a source of confusion for people new to > OpenStack. In the Nova code we use both, but at least for the API we've > been trying to consistently present to the client tenant (which is the > majority usage) rather than project. > > And then Russell pointed out in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57612/ > that the Keystone uses project in the Keystone V3 API rather than > tenant. http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-identity.html#identity-v3 > > I think that we should be consistent across the openstack projects. > From a very quick look at the core openstack projects I think that they > mostly use tenant at the moment rather than project. > > Does this change in Keystone nomenclature signify that we all should be > moving to use project rather than tenant in the future (its not > too late to do a big a search and replace for the Nova V3 API). And is > the plan for Keystone python client to also change to project rather > than tenant? > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131123/e08787ba/attachment.html>