Project is what Keystone chose to standardize on for their v3 API. Lots of other APIs are affected as you can imagine. Here's a thread http://openstack.markmail.org/thread/wyce6kvkfqexcpuu Anne On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Nick Chase <nchase at mirantis.com> wrote: > From a purely documentation and explanatory standpoint I vote for > "project", if we're going to standardize on one or the other. > On Nov 23, 2013 7:13 AM, "Christopher Yeoh" <cbkyeoh at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> So in the past we've used both tenant and project to refer to the same >> thing and I think its been a source of confusion for people new to >> OpenStack. In the Nova code we use both, but at least for the API we've >> been trying to consistently present to the client tenant (which is the >> majority usage) rather than project. >> >> And then Russell pointed out in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57612/ >> that the Keystone uses project in the Keystone V3 API rather than >> tenant. http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-identity.html#identity-v3 >> >> I think that we should be consistent across the openstack projects. >> From a very quick look at the core openstack projects I think that they >> mostly use tenant at the moment rather than project. >> >> Does this change in Keystone nomenclature signify that we all should be >> moving to use project rather than tenant in the future (its not >> too late to do a big a search and replace for the Nova V3 API). And is >> the plan for Keystone python client to also change to project rather >> than tenant? >> >> Chris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Anne Gentle annegentle at justwriteclick.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131123/647e4696/attachment.html>