[Openstack] Cinder iscsi performance
Jimmy Colestock
jcolestock at gmail.com
Mon Jan 15 15:45:47 UTC 2018
Thanks Remo,
Agree’d, ephemeral will pretty much always be faster, I’m seeing orders of magnitude difference between the 2, at times. After a bunch of testing, I’m pretty convinced its not KVM/QEMU or iscsi configurations, it’s looking like its something with my 3par configuration. Initially thought it may just be a function of growing a sparce volume, but running IO tests multiple times, I still get inconsistent results.
Anyway, thanks for the reply..
JC
Jim Colestock
jcolestock at gmail.com <mailto:jcolestock at gmail.com>
> On Jan 12, 2018, at 11:18 AM, Remo Mattei <Remo at italy1.com> wrote:
>
> I think that ephemeral will always be faster than iscsi. We do use PURE on 10GB even though it’s fast but local is faster.
>
> Remo
>
>> On Jan 12, 2018, at 6:27 AM, Jimmy Colestock <jcolestock at gmail.com <mailto:jcolestock at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Fighting an issue with cinder iscsi performance being much slow than local ephemeral disk. We’re running multi-path with dual 10Gb nic, offloading is working and bandwidth across the links is minimal. I’ve looked at kernel schedulers in the VM’s and tried them all.
>>
>> I still need to dig into the storage side (3Par), but just curious if anyone has any suggestions while I keep troubleshooting.
>>
>> Thanks for any help.
>>
>> JC
>>
>>
>> Jim Colestock
>> jcolestock at gmail.com <mailto:jcolestock at gmail.com>
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/jcolestock/ <https://www.linkedin.com/in/jcolestock/>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack>
>> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack at lists.openstack.org>
>> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20180115/63832b47/attachment.html>
More information about the Openstack
mailing list