[Openstack] Production openstack on 5 node
Satish Patel
satish.txt at gmail.com
Thu Jun 29 13:23:26 UTC 2017
I have implemented DVR in test environment but not sure how much it's popular in production in sense of complexity and management.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 25, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Remo Mattei <remo at italy1.com> wrote:
>
> Dvr is good option if you want to implement a way to have your vms always available. It needs ovs.
>
> I still have not seen a doc details on implementation yet.
>
> :)
>
> Inviato da iPhone
>
>> Il giorno 25 giu 2017, alle ore 12:38, Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>
>> Thank you folks!
>>
>> I have 5 node so following role i am planning to implement, I am
>> little confused related network component, should i use DVR
>> (distributed virtual router ) but problem is every single node need
>> public IP address in that case, first time building production style
>> openstack so don't know what would be the best option?
>>
>> 1 controller + network
>> 4 compute node
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Mike Smith <mismith at overstock.com> wrote:
>>> Agree you should definitely check out what is already out there in community
>>> if you are starting from scratch. In our specific case, we do our puppet
>>> configs manually because 1) we are still on puppet v3 for everything else
>>> and 2) we have been doing it this way since Folsom and it’s worked well.
>>>
>>> We are about to build another new cluster on Ocata and I think for that one
>>> I will try and leverage more of the community puppet stuff if possible.
>>>
>>> On Jun 21, 2017, at 1:49 PM, John van Ommen <john.vanommen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I couldn't agree more. OpenStack deployment is not a trivial task. Do not
>>> reinvent the wheel.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Jun 21, 2017 12:04 PM, "Erik McCormick" <emccormick at cirrusseven.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If you are a Puppet shop you should check out the Puppet community
>>>> modules. You will get familiar with all the inner goo as you'll need your
>>>> own composition layer (in my case a series of hiera files). There's no
>>>> reason to reinvent the wheel unless you really want to.
>>>>
>>>> -Erik
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 21, 2017 2:19 PM, "Satish Patel" <satish.txt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you all of you for your opinion, As mike suggested i am also
>>>>> planning to brew home grown puppet module to understand each and every
>>>>> component and their role instead of grabbing third party tool, I am
>>>>> sure OOO is best for 100 deploying 100 compute node but in my setup we
>>>>> have only 5 servers and its not worth it to manage undercloud server.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are puppet shop so it would be easy to write own code and go from
>>>>> there.
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Remo Mattei <remo at italy1.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I did a deployment with cs9 hp it was pretty bad. I hope the new one
>>>>>> does
>>>>>> better.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nevertheless I do not see many using hp out there. Maybe different
>>>>>> regions
>>>>>> like emea do better with that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Inviato da iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Il giorno 20 giu 2017, alle ore 21:10, John van Ommen
>>>>>> <john.vanommen at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At HPE we originally used TripleO but switched to a 'flat' model.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I personally didn't see any advantage to Triple O. In theory, it should
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> easier to manage and upgrade. In the real world, Helion 3.0 and 4.0 are
>>>>>> superior in every respect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 20, 2017 9:02 PM, "Remo Mattei" <remo at italy1.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I worked for Red Hat and they really want to get ooo going because the
>>>>>>> installation tools did never work as everyone was hoping. Before Red
>>>>>>> Hat I
>>>>>>> was at Mirantis and the fuel installation was nice now dead. I know
>>>>>>> ooo will
>>>>>>> go into containers next couple of release but kolla–Ansible is one of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> emerging solutions now to get it out fast.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am doing a project now where I am working on deploying ooo just
>>>>>>> finished
>>>>>>> the doc for Ocata undercloud.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just my two cents to concord with Mike’s statement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Remo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Inviato da iPhone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Il giorno 20 giu 2017, alle ore 20:51, Mike Smith
>>>>>>> <mismith at overstock.com>
>>>>>>> ha scritto:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are definitely 1,001 opinions on what is “best”. We use RDO at
>>>>>>> Overstock and we use home-grown puppet modules because we do our own
>>>>>>> puppet
>>>>>>> modules for everything else we do here. We based everything around
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> official Openstack install documents and we do it because we want to
>>>>>>> *fully*
>>>>>>> understand everything we can instead of treating it like a black box
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> knows how to do the magic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, there are lots of options out there - ansible, kolla, puppet
>>>>>>> plus
>>>>>>> vendor-specific options too like those provided by Mirantis. If there
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> config management tools (ansible, puppet, etc) that you already use,
>>>>>>> you may
>>>>>>> want to check out the Openstack options for those. You are correct
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> that packstack is more of a ‘all-in-one-server’ installer for a quick
>>>>>>> POC.
>>>>>>> It can to more, but I think RDO recommends “Triple-O” (which stands
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> Openstack-on-Openstack) for production RDO deploys. Since they are
>>>>>>> affiliated with RedHat, they would also lean heavily towards the
>>>>>>> Ansible
>>>>>>> option as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good luck!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike Smith
>>>>>>> Overstock Cloud Team
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 20, 2017, at 5:49 PM, Erik McCormick
>>>>>>> <emccormick at cirrusseven.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a religious discussion for most, but I would suggest Kolla. It
>>>>>>> takes out a lot of the guess work, has a good upgrade mechanism, and
>>>>>>> is well
>>>>>>> supported by the community via mailing list and ORC. Take a look.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Erik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jun 20, 2017 7:15 PM, "Satish Patel" <satish.txt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are deploying 5 node openstack cloud for internal use and
>>>>>>>> wondering
>>>>>>>> what method we should use, initial test was on RDO packstack but i
>>>>>>>> heard packstack isn't good for production, some people on google
>>>>>>>> suggesting using triplo. I found its little complicated because you
>>>>>>>> need one more extra server run undercloud openstack to deploy
>>>>>>>> overcloud openstack, should i really use triplo or is there any other
>>>>>>>> and easy method which can allow us to upgrade in future also.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Mailing list:
>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>>>>>> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe :
>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Mailing list:
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>>>>> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>>> Unsubscribe :
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wbr>5949ed75173232896912281!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Mailing list:
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>>>>> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>>> Unsubscribe :
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Mailing list:
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>>>>> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>>> Unsubscribe :
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> !DSPAM:1,5949f395185901832122137!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Mailing list:
>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>>>> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>> Unsubscribe :
>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mailing list:
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>>> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>>>>> Unsubscribe :
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mailing list:
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>>>> Unsubscribe :
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>>> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>>> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>
>> !DSPAM:1,5950147e175761804531647!
>>
>
More information about the Openstack
mailing list