[Openstack] OpenStack (+ Quantum Deployment) Scenarios
Skible OpenStack
skible.openstack at gmail.com
Thu Nov 8 21:06:05 UTC 2012
Thank you Dan for shedding light on this matter. However, there is
something concerns me and a lot of other people trying to deploy
OpenStack is that most Servers has 2 NICs which creates a problem
because your Demo is a great one but the necessary hardware is just not
always met !
I have been struggling to find a solution out of it, can you suggest
some please ?
Le 08/11/2012 21:38, Dan Wendlandt a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> The Quantum Admin Guide indicates that you can choose to combine all
> services onto a single node, or have separate nodes:
> http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-network/admin/content/services.html
>
> I will update the text to indicate that that the main reason to use a
> dedicated network gateway node is if you plan on having VMs send
> substantial amounts of traffic through that node, and thus would not
> want that CPU usage to conflict with other openstack services running
> on your controller node.
>
> dan
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Skible OpenStack
> <skible.openstack at gmail.com <mailto:skible.openstack at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Can someone please enlighten us about the goods of having a
> separated network node ?
> I honestly work in production envirnoments (over 30 nodes) and i
> really give computing resources more credit than networking ones !
>
> Am i doing it the wrong way here ?
>
> Le 08/11/2012 18:49, balaji patnala a écrit :
>> Hi Openers,
>> One doubt i have is like, as we see in the demo setup in the
>> Quantum Admin guide available in openstack.org
>> <http://openstack.org>, we have Network Node as a seperate
>> physical node connected to Controller Node and Compute Node.
>> But i see that the openstack community who is actively using
>> Folsom is not discussing more on this kind of setup.
>> Not sure if iam missing any key information on this like that the
>> Network Node setup may not be widely used in current deployment
>> scenarios or it is too early to use Network Node as a seperate
>> physical host for openstack.
>> Open comments on this will be more helpful for openstack
>> community to understand better on the features of folsom.
>> regards,
>> balaji
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Skible OpenStack
>> <skible.openstack at gmail.com <mailto:skible.openstack at gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> OpenStack Folsom install guide
>> <https://github.com/mseknibilel/OpenStack-Folsom-Install-guide/blob/master/OpenStack_Folsom_Install_Guide_WebVersion.rst>
>>
>>
>> You will find what you want and even more ;)
>>
>> Le 08/11/2012 14:30, Veera Reddy a écrit :
>>> Hi Skible,
>>>
>>> Can you please send me below configuration files of three
>>> setups you have mentioned.
>>>
>>> * ovs_quantum_plugin.ini (For controller and node)
>>> * nova.conf (For controller and node)
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Veera.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Skible OpenStack
>>> <skible.openstack at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:skible.openstack at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Stackers !
>>>
>>> I am currently trying to create pictures of my OpenStack
>>> deployment architecture as a part of my OpenStack Folsom
>>> install guide
>>> <https://github.com/mseknibilel/OpenStack-Folsom-Install-guide/blob/master/OpenStack_Folsom_Install_Guide_WebVersion.rst>
>>> and i would like to ask a favorite.
>>>
>>> Could you be kind and please take a look at these Pics
>>> below and report back if there is a missing or wrong thing.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> ==========Quantum on VLAN + 3 NICs on controller
>>> node============
>>> http://i.imgur.com/Ueh5Z.jpg
>>> ===================================================
>>>
>>> ==========Quantum on VLAN + 2 NICs on controller
>>> node============
>>> http://i.imgur.com/RK6X7.jpg
>>> ===================================================
>>>
>>> ==========Quantum on GRE-tunneling + 3 NICs on
>>> controller node=======
>>> http://i.imgur.com/1jCFC.jpg
>>> ===================================================
>>>
>>>
>>> To make of OpenStack, the IT project of the century
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>>> Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>>> <mailto:openstack at lists.launchpad.net>
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> VeeraReddy.B
>>> 9959236555.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>> Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>> <mailto:openstack at lists.launchpad.net>
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
> Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> <mailto:openstack at lists.launchpad.net>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Dan Wendlandt
> Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com <http://www.nicira.com>
> twitter: danwendlandt
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20121108/c4ee8bff/attachment.html>
More information about the Openstack
mailing list