[Openstack] Duplication of code in nova and cinder
john.griffith at solidfire.com
Tue Dec 11 23:37:46 UTC 2012
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:36 PM, John Griffith
<john.griffith at solidfire.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Sam Morrison <sorrison at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I attempted to create a volume from an image in cinder and was getting
>> this strange error, turns out it was because I had my glance servers
>> specified as https://glanceserver:9292
>> In cinder the version of images/glance.py is older than the one in nova
>> and is missing the ssl support additions.
>> My real question is why is there one version is nova and one version in
>> cinder. I also think there is quite a bit more unnecessary duplication.
>> Should it all go into oslo?
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> Hi Sam,
> Short answer is "yes". Need to check scoping etc and make sure that it
> does in fact fit within the parameters of OSLO. It's something I thought
> of a couple weeks ago but to be honest it's been low on my list personally
> and nobody else that I know of has shown an interest in picking it up.
> You'll notice another image related item we're *borrowing* from Nova
> (cinder.image.image_utils). In both cases there are slight modifications
> to fit Cinder's use case that given a bit of work could easily be shared.
BTW, we can update to include the SSL changes your bug references right
away. Long term, I'd like to go with the OSLO approach.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Openstack