On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Sam Morrison <sorrison at gmail.com> wrote: > I attempted to create a volume from an image in cinder and was getting > this strange error, turns out it was because I had my glance servers > specified as https://glanceserver:9292 > > In cinder the version of images/glance.py is older than the one in nova > and is missing the ssl support additions. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1089147 > > My real question is why is there one version is nova and one version in > cinder. I also think there is quite a bit more unnecessary duplication. > Should it all go into oslo? > > Cheers, > Sam > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > Hi Sam, Short answer is "yes". Need to check scoping etc and make sure that it does in fact fit within the parameters of OSLO. It's something I thought of a couple weeks ago but to be honest it's been low on my list personally and nobody else that I know of has shown an interest in picking it up. You'll notice another image related item we're *borrowing* from Nova (cinder.image.image_utils). In both cases there are slight modifications to fit Cinder's use case that given a bit of work could easily be shared. John -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20121211/6e2225a5/attachment.html>