[Openstack] Openstack API - Volumes?
Justin Santa Barbara
justin at fathomdb.com
Tue Mar 22 20:33:04 UTC 2011
I am happy to do a first pass over the volume API. I can do it as an
extension or not, whatever is more likely to be merged.
My personal feeling is that we shouldn't use extensions for something this
core, but we can do a 'full lifecycle' if we want: I'll write it as an
extension, we work on it as a community, then we promote it into core
if/when it is ready.
The thing I don't like about the extension promotion process is that it
breaks clients when the volume API is promoted. But I'm all for trying it
and seeing what happens.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Justin Santa Barbara
> <justin at fathomdb.com> wrote:
> > So: When can we expect volume support in nova? If I repackaged my
> > API as an extension, can we get it merged into Cactus?
> I would personally support this.
> Wasn't one of the ideas of the extensions API to provide a bit of a
> playground for features to bake that, at some future time, be made a
> core resource endpoint in the OpenStack API? This would be a perfect
> example of that, no?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Openstack