Open Stack

Also an option :) If something is nothing more than a sales pitch, we 
will flag it as such.

> Ruben D. Orduz <mailto:rubenoz at gmail.com>
> February 13, 2017 at 11:10 AM
> Why is the email step required at all? If it's vendor-heavy or pushing 
> a particular product, give thumbs down and move on.
>
>
> Jimmy McArthur <mailto:jimmy at openstack.org>
> February 13, 2017 at 11:07 AM
> James,
>
> If you feel it's specifically a vendor pitch, feel free to send an 
> email to speakersupport at openstack.org and we can review. The 
> Foundation does not support single vendor pitches, and of course, the 
> content cannot be about closed source products.
>
> Cheers!
> Jimmy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
> Wolfe, Brendan <mailto:Brendan.Wolfe at netapp.com>
> February 13, 2017 at 10:49 AM
>
> Absolutely
>
> *From: *"SaintRossy, James" <James_SaintRossy at comcast.com>
> *Date: *Monday, February 13, 2017 at 8:29 AM
> *To: *"openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org" 
> <openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject: *[Openstack-track-chairs] Guidance on Vendor Specific 
> Presentations?
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I’m a 1st time track chair so pardon my ignorance if this question 
> seems obvious.  In my initial review for the storage track I see 
> several presentations that are vendor specific and possibly closed 
> source.  Should that have any bearing on our evaluations?
>
> Thanks, James.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-track-chairs/attachments/20170213/15a6686d/attachment.html>