Open Stack

Why is the email step required at all? If it's vendor-heavy or pushing a
particular product, give thumbs down and move on.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Jimmy McArthur <jimmy at openstack.org>
wrote:

> James,
>
> If you feel it's specifically a vendor pitch, feel free to send an email
> to speakersupport at openstack.org and we can review. The Foundation does
> not support single vendor pitches, and of course, the content cannot be
> about closed source products.
>
> Cheers!
> Jimmy
>
> Wolfe, Brendan <Brendan.Wolfe at netapp.com>
> February 13, 2017 at 10:49 AM
>
> Absolutely
>
>
>
> *From: *"SaintRossy, James" <James_SaintRossy at comcast.com>
> <James_SaintRossy at comcast.com>
> *Date: *Monday, February 13, 2017 at 8:29 AM
> *To: *"openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org"
> <openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org>
> <openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org>
> <openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject: *[Openstack-track-chairs] Guidance on Vendor Specific
> Presentations?
>
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
>
>
> I’m a 1st time track chair so pardon my ignorance if this question seems
> obvious.  In my initial review for the storage track I see several
> presentations that are vendor specific and possibly closed source.  Should
> that have any bearing on our evaluations?
>
>
>
> Thanks, James.
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-track-chairs/attachments/20170213/9608c543/attachment.html>