Open Stack

My intention based on current understandign would be to create a git
repo called "osops-docs" as this fits current naming an thin initial
document we intend to put there and the others we may adopt from
docs-team.

My understanding being they don't to have this type of
documentention due to much reduced team size and prefer it live with
subject matter experts. It that correct?  If that's not correct I'm
not personally opposed to trying this under docs.  We'll need to
maintain enough contributors and reviewers to make the work flow go in
either location and that's my understanding of the basic issue not
where it lives.

This naming would also match other repos wich could be consolidated into an
"osops" repo to rule them all.  That may make sense as I think there's
significant overlap in set of people who might contribute, but that
can be a parallel conversation.

Doug looking at new project docs I think most of it is clear enough to
me.  Since it's not code I can skip all th PyPi stuff yes? The repo
creation seems pretty clear and I can steal the CI stuff from similar
projects.  I'm a little unclear on the Storyboard bit I've not done
much contribution lately and haven't storyboarded.  Is that relevant
(or at least relevent at first) for this use case?  If it is I
probably have more questions.

I agree governance can also be a parallel discussion.  I don't have
strong opinions there but seems based on participants and content like
a "UC" thing but < shrug />

-Jon