Open Stack

On 05/17/2015 04:33 PM, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
> Probably the solution is not selected to be backported because:
>
>   * It’s an intrusive change
>   * Introduces new dependencies
>   * Probably it’s going to introduce a performance penalty because 
> eatables is slow.
>
> I’m asking in reviews for this feature to be enabled/disabled via a flag.
>
>
I'm understand that. All neutron/ovs stuff is horrible in term of 
performance. But it makes compromise between security fix and 
'concerns'. I do not worry about problem, I worry about trading security 
for something else. If this is not fixed, why bother to talk about 
'supported/unsupported' versions of openstack?

Btw: If it is good enough for Libre, why it is not good enough for Kilo?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150522/5cc415d2/attachment.html>