Open Stack

Hey Mike,

Would you send along your solution off-list? I'm curious, and I won't judge
:)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Mike Spreitzer <mspreitz at us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Jacob Godin <jacobgodin at gmail.com> wrote on 04/14/2015 05:12:48 PM:
>
> > Absolutely. We're trying to reduce our public IPv4 usage, so having
> > one per tenant network (not even including floating IPs) is a drain.
>
> I am having exactly the same issue.  I am currently solving it with a
> different hack that nobody likes, I will not even describe it here.  But
> total agreement that the problem is important.
>
> IPv6 is the ultimate answer, provided there is a reasonably smooth
> transition.  I think we will need to support a tenant that is using both v4
> and v6 during his transition.  This will require NAT between a tenant's v4
> and v6.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150414/0fcf34ec/attachment.html>