Jacob Godin <jacobgodin at gmail.com> wrote on 04/14/2015 05:12:48 PM: > Absolutely. We're trying to reduce our public IPv4 usage, so having > one per tenant network (not even including floating IPs) is a drain. I am having exactly the same issue. I am currently solving it with a different hack that nobody likes, I will not even describe it here. But total agreement that the problem is important. IPv6 is the ultimate answer, provided there is a reasonably smooth transition. I think we will need to support a tenant that is using both v4 and v6 during his transition. This will require NAT between a tenant's v4 and v6. Regards, Mike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150414/7a134251/attachment.html>