Open Stack

On 02/21/2014 03:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Joe Gordon wrote:
>>> The move to stackforge would make sense if it was developed by a nascent
>>> separate group, but I don't think that's the case here ?
>>
>> I think this is the case, currently the core group on gantt is
>> nova-core and Robert Collins, while the main commiter is Donald Dugger
>> (who asked for gantt to be kept around to play with). But now that we
>> have decided that we have no use for the gantt repo, I don't think it
>> makes sense for nova-core to take on the burdon of reviewing gantt
>> patches.  I know that I won't be anymore (I think I have reviewed
>> every gantt patch to date).
> 
> That's a fair point. In the end the granularity of a program is linked
> to the interest of its team in general and its core reviewers team in
> particular. If those don't overlap, you're better off with not having
> that code repo under your program.
> 
> From what you're saying that seems to be a "nascent separate group"
> forming, in which case I agree stackforge is probably the best bet.
> 

Good points ... I don't think any of the current gantt-core are
interested in reviewing right now.  I'm happy to open up gantt-core to
Don and whoever else would like to join him, but I would want to move it
first.

-- 
Russell Bryant