Open Stack

Hi,

I don't think just deleting the meeting slots due to resource constraint is
not an optimal solution.
Although there have been no meetings, I think we need to stay with
visibility.

I know the meeting slots are public resources while it definitely seems
that other SIG/teams also occupy unused resources.
I believe they are not overloaded (e.g., contributing huge network
traffic). I think this would be rather low-priority.

Three approaches I can think before I18n SIG does a next action regarding a
team meeting slot:
 1. moving (bi-)weekly rhythm to (bi-)monthly / quarterly
 2. Re-thinking meeting rhythm considering release schedule (e.g., before
soft-freeze / hard-freeze)
 3. For status update purpose (e.g., #startmeeting, #topic, #action,
#endmeeting) regardless of quorum

Love to listen to more thought, and always feel free to ping me through IRC
if urgent.. thanks!


With many thanks,

/Ian

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:28 PM Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 7:22 AM Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Akihiro: Thank you for poking this. Do you think the meeting is needed?
> Any topic would you like to bring now?
>
> IMHO I see no need for the meeting and have no topic for the meeting.
> I just noticed it just when I checked the i18n document for other
> purposes and I was surprised.
> It is confusing if a meeting which is not held is listed in the meeting
> list.
> I also remembered that someone asked if there is a meeting in the IRC
> channel several months ago. It was asked around the meeting time, so I
> guess he/she came the channel but nobody else was there. It is not a
> good situation and I think it is time to drop the regular meeting
> schedule explicitly.
>
> >
> > Hello all I18n team members,
> >
> > I will wait more on demands, but if there is no demand, I will propose a
> patch to change the description like:
> >   "Any OpenStack member can request a I18n team meeting. Feel free to
> bring your topic and tell I18n SIG lead or team members on IRC channel so
> that we have a meeting up on request"
>
> My main point is to drop the meeting slot from OpenStack meeting schedule.
> The i18n SIG reserves a slot but it is not used. While the slot
> reserved by the i18n SIG is not crowded, it waste a public resource.
> I am not sure what is your proposal. Does it mean you continue to
> reserve the meeting slot?
> Even if the i18n SIG does not reserve the meeting slot, we can have a
> meeting on demand
> in the openstack-i18n IRC channel as the meetbot supports meetings in
> any IRC channel.
>
> Thanks,
> Akihiro Motoki (irc: amotoki)
>
>
> >
> >
> > With many thanks,
> >
> > /Ian
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:18 AM Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The I18n team books a team meeting slot [1] but we don't have meetings
> >> since Jul 2019 [2].
> >> Would we like to keep the slot or can we release it?
> >> In addition, we can update our document page on the meeting [3].
> >>
> >> Thought?
> >>
> >> Akihiro Motoki (irc: amotoki)
> >>
> >> [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#I18N_Team_Meeting
> >> [2] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_i18n_meeting/
> >> [3] https://docs.openstack.org/i18n/latest/i18n_team_meeting.html
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenStack-I18n mailing list
> >> OpenStack-I18n at lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/attachments/20210228/c5bc61b2/attachment.html>