Open Stack

Hello,

Actually I do not know exactly how I see a list of stable/newton 
versions in Zanata.
(Should I click all the projects and check corresponding versions 
currently?)
But yes, there are also many server-side projects, such as nova and neutron.

Andreas Jaeger wrote on 9/19/2016 9:07 PM:
> On 2016-09-16 17:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Job to sync translated projects:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365872/
>>
>> Please review - and if I missed some repos, create a new change,
> I noticed that more projects have stable-newton branches in Zanata then
> those that I added - and thus far more than are mentioned on the front page.
>
> Do you really want to allow translation of all of these - or focus like
> it's written on the Zanata front page and as Ian states in "To language
> team coordinators: Let's speed up for Newton translation​" on a few
> Horizon projects?
>
> I suggest to focus and remove stable-newton branch from those projects
> you're not handling.
>
> Should that list be the list of repos I enabled in infra? Or only the
> dashboard ones?
>
> So, basically, what I'd like to know:
> * Which projects should have stable-newton in Zanata?
That is why I intended first to check whether there will be more IBM 
translations or not,
since IBM contributed translations on server-side projects a lot.

As 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/073942.html 
shared about one year ago,
and at Austin I18n meetup, server-side projects were not included in our 
priority.
( Austin I18n meetup Etherpad: 
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/austin-i18n-meetup )

Non-prioritizing would mean non-consideration of stable/newton branches 
for server projects in Zanata?
I do not clearly remember it, but if it is okay, currently I am okay to 
remove those projects which are not handled.

But still, I would like to know to IBM's translation contribution plan, 
and also listen
to language coordinators and translators by this mailing list or later 
I18n IRC meeting.

For documentation projects (e.g., openstack-manuals), creating stable 
versions after release data is needed.

> * Which should be synced to git (IMHO the same ones)?
IMO same as the 1st
> * Do you want to point out further repos besides the dashboard ones? If
> yes, how?
I think current decision for Newton is up to Kato-san, since he is now 
Newton PTL :)
Kato-san, do you have idea on that?

And of course, I really want to point out documentation projects for 
stable/newton branch after the release date during Ocata cycle.


With many thanks,

/Ian
>
>
> Andreas