Open Stack

On 09/04/15 15:36, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 04/09/2015 09:22 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
>> On 09/04/15 15:19, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>> On 04/09/2015 09:03 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
>>>> At a quick glance, I think the rst2pot tool probably needs some work to
>>>> reduce the amount of markup that comes through.
>>>>
>>>> One low-hanging-fruit would be strings like:
>>>>
>>>> **Determine which flavor to use for your database**
>>>>
>>>> **Restore using incremental backups**
>>>
>>> We use upstream Sphinx tools here and nothing self-written, changes for
>>> that tool might impact other projects using it.
>>
>> Simply: the lack of ability to make a simple modification like this is a
>> significant regression from the existing documentation toolchain that
>> needs to be fixed.
> 
> Tom, I disagree.
> 
> When Daisy wrote up the way we implemented the RST translation
> toolchain, it was one of our goals to use what upstream delivers to have
> less trouble with maintaining our own tools,
> 
> Here's what Daisy documented:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/I18n/Tools#Tools_related_with_RST_document_translation
> 
> 
> And here's her patch to implement it:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161662/
> 

Andreas, Daisy and I are on IRC talking this now -
#openstack-translation if anyone wants to join.

Regards,

Tom