Open Stack

I'm double-booked at your meeting time today, so I thought I'd write a
response here.

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Sean Roberts <seanroberts66 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> We started discussing incubating the training guides project a while ago.
> It seemed that there was enough differences to consider the project
> separate from the other docs projects. We had a new repository created as a
> first step in this direction. Due to the current publishing of the training
> guides to docs.openstack.org, we collectively decided to create the new
> repo in the OpenStack github organization.
> Fast forward to the current time. Between the neutron and nova projects,
> they are both debating spinning off sub-projects. These would have some
> incubation properties and goals.
> I recommend we wait for these incubation sub-projects plans to play out
> over the next few months before we make a decision on the training guides
> incubation.
>

I know you're not asking me, and you're asking the team, which is cool. But
I need to point out that your comparison may not be apt here. The neutron
incubation discussion is about merging features or entire APIs into the
neutron tree. I don't think that's your end goal here, your end goal sounds
like standing up a new program just for training due to the differences
from docs.

Just not sure the neutron incubation path discussion is a match for this
discussion, they're a bit too different for me to wrap my head around the
comparison.

Do you want a separate team and PTL? What benefits are you seeking?

That's more of the discussion than looking for an existing pattern, I
think. Let me know what your goals are.

Thanks,
Anne


> Team, what do you think?
>
> ~sean
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-docs mailing list
> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140922/e70ff299/attachment.html>