[Openstack-docs] Minimum time before approving a review request

Nicholas Chase nchase at mirantis.com
Mon Sep 8 18:41:43 UTC 2014


On 9/8/2014 2:30 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Christian Berendt 
> <berendt at b1-systems.de <mailto:berendt at b1-systems.de>> wrote:
>
>     I would like to propose the introduction of a minimum time before
>     approving a new review request.
>
>     Example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/119783/
>
>     Uploaded: Sep 8, 2014 4:59 PM
>     First +2: 6:10 PM
>     Second +2: 8:15 PM
>     Approval: 8:16 PM
>
>     I think we should wait at least 24 hours before approving a new review
>     request (exception: urgent or generated changes). This way
>     everybody of
>     us has the chance to realize and review new review requests.
>
>
> Interesting proposal, we did not address in 
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/ReviewGuidelines -- my 
> feeling is that we can't all review all patches so it's better to not 
> enforce a minimum wait time. The impatience people have with our 
> reviews should be reversed and we shouldn't have a policy of an 
> enforced wait time.
>
> To me, it's preferred to have hundreds of patches go through 
> efficiently rather than ensure everyone sees every patch.
>
> Just my thinking though, would love to hear what others have to say.
>

I think that it's a good thought to make sure that patches have enough 
oversight, but it's unrealistic to have "everybody" look at a patch; 
there's just not enough time, as evidenced by the backlog we already 
have. If a patch goes through and someone has a concern, opening a new 
bug is just a button-click away.

I also agree that people (all over OpenStack, not just in Docs) are 
already frustrated enough with the review process. ENSURING that it 
takes a day will only make things worse, I would think.

But perhaps if there's a patch that people are concerned about -- say 
something major is going on -- there's a way for us to flag it, or maybe 
just to have the cores to +1 it temporarily just to show that they're in 
favor, while it's being further reviewed?

----  Nick

-- 
Nick Chase
1-650-567-5640
Technical Marketing Manager, Mirantis
Editor, OpenStack:Now
<http://openstacksv.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140908/899b7e9d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: www.openstacksv.com_.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7160 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140908/899b7e9d/attachment.png>


More information about the Openstack-docs mailing list