Open Stack

I see the situation a bit differently. I donate a lot of time to upstream
contributions of which diagrams consume a significant portion and prefer to
use whatever application makes the process most efficient and the output
most professional providing it can support files that follow open
standards. OmniGraffle meets these requirements. I don't see anyone
complaining about the use of oXygen for XML files which has a tendency to
occasionally restructure (indents, line lengths, etc.) files and add
proprietary metadata (usually in comments) to them.

On Fri Nov 28 2014 at 9:16:46 AM Christian Berendt <berendt at b1-systems.de>
wrote:

> On 11/28/2014 03:46 PM, Matt Kassawara wrote:
> > rather straightforward. As for .graffle files in the repo, I would like
> > to store them somewhere because a lot of people appear to use
> > OmniGraffle and those files contain metadata that improves efficiency
> > over SVGs.
>
> I think that it is not correct to use proprietary software running on a
> proprietary operating system generating proprietary source files to
> create graphics for the OpenStack documentation. There is usable open
> source software to create graphics (like inkscape) and I think such
> software should be used and has to be used.
>
> Christian.
>
> --
> Christian Berendt
> Cloud Solution Architect
> Mail: berendt at b1-systems.de
>
> B1 Systems GmbH
> Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
> GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20141128/0d237f35/attachment-0001.html>