[Openstack-docs] Replace shorten URLs with destination URLs in the operation guide
Tom Fifield
tom at openstack.org
Tue Aug 12 14:29:13 UTC 2014
On 04/08/14 22:38, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org
> <mailto:tom at openstack.org>> wrote:
>
> On 01/08/14 07:22, Tom Fifield wrote:
>
> On 30/07/14 22:36, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Christian Berendt
> <berendt at b1-systems.de <mailto:berendt at b1-systems.de>
> <mailto:berendt at b1-systems.de
> <mailto:berendt at b1-systems.de>>__> wrote:
>
> On 07/30/2014 07:52 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> > Please assign any broken link bugs for the opsgui.de
> <http://opsgui.de>
> <http://opsgui.de> URLs to Anne or
> > myself, and we can easily fix them on bit.ly
> <http://bit.ly> <http://bit.ly>. If
> anyone else is
> > interested in having access to change these URLs -
> please let me know.
>
> Ok. I'll open a bugreport with all broken URLs.
>
>
> Thanks for finding these Christian!
>
> I do agree the maintenance is a bit tougher with
> shortened... we wanted
> to try it for readability and I think it works nicely. But
> we learn as
> we go.
>
> If anyone has great ideas for grouping those shortened URLs
> or otherwise
> making something cool with them, I'd love to get more
> mileage out of those.
>
>
> I may have been misled on the capabilities here.
>
> A beverage of your choice if you can find a way to update a link
> target
> in bit.ly <http://bit.ly> - I couldn't find how to do it yesterday.
>
>
> Anyone?
>
>
> Nope, just went through all the API docs too and it appears they only
> shorten long URLs and don't think of it as a pointer service.
Thanks for checking!
We should approve this patch from Christian then, I think:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111831/
> If bit.ly <http://bit.ly> URLs can't be updated, we should remove
> them as per Christian's plan, and also submit errata to the OReilly
> book page.
>
>
> Or, create a new short URL pointing to the correct long URL. But I don't
> think that's what we want.
Yeah, agreed. Do you want to tell OReilly that we have broken links?
Otherwise, I think I know how to use the author portal to submit errata ...
>
> Really, for printed books, it's better to do the footnote as mentioned
> in the other thread. I'll reply there too.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom
>
>
More information about the Openstack-docs
mailing list