+1: A great way to distinguish actions from pure lists. Add <step> for items? - Nermina On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Diane Fleming <diane.fleming at rackspace.com > wrote: > I think it's the right way to go - procedures. > > *Diane* > *----------------------------------------------* > Diane Fleming > Software Developer II - US > diane.fleming at rackspace.com > Cell 512.323.6799 > Office 512.874.1260 > Skype drfleming0227 > Google-plus diane.fleming at gmail.com > > From: Anne Gentle <anne at openstack.org> > Date: Thursday, July 25, 2013 10:25 AM > To: "openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org" < > openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org> > > Subject: [Openstack-docs] orderedlist vs procedure > > Hi all, > I've noticed a general trend towards using <procedure> markup and I like > it, even though our original Conventions indicate to use <orderedlist>. [1] > > Would it be okay to change our Conventions to prefer <procedure> for > tasks as opposed to <orderedlist>? > > Let me know and I'll make the change to the wiki page. Changes to the > source can be done over time. > > Anne > > 1. > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/Conventions#Ordered_procedure_to_follow_.28where_step_2_needs_to_be_done_after_step_1.29 > > _______________________________________________ > Openstack-docs mailing list > Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20130725/7aa33355/attachment-0001.html>