Open Stack

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Nermina Miller <nerminamiller at gmail.com>wrote:

> +1: A great way to distinguish actions from pure lists. Add <step> for
> items? - Nermina
>
>
Yep, exactly. A <procedure> has a title as well.


>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Diane Fleming <
> diane.fleming at rackspace.com> wrote:
>
>>   I think it's the right way to go -  procedures.
>>
>>   *Diane*
>>  *----------------------------------------------*
>>  Diane Fleming
>>  Software Developer II - US
>>  diane.fleming at rackspace.com
>> Cell  512.323.6799
>> Office 512.874.1260
>>  Skype drfleming0227
>> Google-plus diane.fleming at gmail.com
>>
>>   From: Anne Gentle <anne at openstack.org>
>> Date: Thursday, July 25, 2013 10:25 AM
>> To: "openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org" <
>> openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
>>
>> Subject: [Openstack-docs] orderedlist vs procedure
>>
>>   Hi all,
>> I've noticed a general trend towards using <procedure> markup and I like
>> it, even though our original Conventions indicate to use <orderedlist>. [1]
>>
>>  Would it be okay to change our Conventions to prefer <procedure> for
>> tasks as opposed to <orderedlist>?
>>
>>  Let me know and I'll make the change to the wiki page. Changes to the
>> source can be done over time.
>>
>>  Anne
>>
>>  1.
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/Conventions#Ordered_procedure_to_follow_.28where_step_2_needs_to_be_done_after_step_1.29
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openstack-docs mailing list
>> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20130725/b2f1d9aa/attachment-0001.html>