[Openstack-docs] orderedlist vs procedure
Anne Gentle
anne at openstack.org
Thu Jul 25 15:51:56 UTC 2013
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Diane Fleming <diane.fleming at rackspace.com
> wrote:
> I think it's the right way to go - procedures.
>
I do too.
As far as style goes, do we want military style numbering for procedure
titles, such as 3.1, 3.2, 3.3? That's how they're output in HTML now.
Anne
>
> *Diane*
> *----------------------------------------------*
> Diane Fleming
> Software Developer II - US
> diane.fleming at rackspace.com
> Cell 512.323.6799
> Office 512.874.1260
> Skype drfleming0227
> Google-plus diane.fleming at gmail.com
>
> From: Anne Gentle <anne at openstack.org>
> Date: Thursday, July 25, 2013 10:25 AM
> To: "openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org" <
> openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
>
> Subject: [Openstack-docs] orderedlist vs procedure
>
> Hi all,
> I've noticed a general trend towards using <procedure> markup and I like
> it, even though our original Conventions indicate to use <orderedlist>. [1]
>
> Would it be okay to change our Conventions to prefer <procedure> for
> tasks as opposed to <orderedlist>?
>
> Let me know and I'll make the change to the wiki page. Changes to the
> source can be done over time.
>
> Anne
>
> 1.
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/Conventions#Ordered_procedure_to_follow_.28where_step_2_needs_to_be_done_after_step_1.29
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20130725/0b5064c7/attachment.html>
More information about the Openstack-docs
mailing list