Open Stack

Hi all,
Choice B it is -- I think I understand fortnightly to mean every other
Tuesday. I hope that's' right.

I've updated the iCal feed at
https://www.google.com/calendar/ical/bj05mroquq28jhud58esggqmh4@group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics
to reflect an every other Tuesday meeting at the same time as our
meeting is now, 1300 UTC.

Feel free to add to the agenda at
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/DocTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting
.

Thanks,
Anne



On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org> wrote:

> b)
>
> On 15/08/13 09:18, Summer Long wrote:
> > Vote:
> >
> > b) Move to meeting fortnightly.
> >
> >
> > cheers, Summer
> >
> > Summer Long
> > OpenStack Documentation
> > Engineering Content Services
> >
> > Red Hat Asia Pacific
> > Brisbane, Australia
> > slong at redhat.com <mailto:slong at redhat.com>
> >
> > On 08/14/2013 07:39 AM, Steve Gordon wrote:
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Anne Gentle" <annegentle at justwriteclick.com>
> >>> To: "David Cramer" <david.cramer at rackspace.com>
> >>> Cc: "Steve Gordon" <sgordon at redhat.com>,
> openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 12:09:25 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [Openstack-docs] Update docs project meeting frequency?
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:56 AM, David Cramer
> >>> <david.cramer at rackspace.com>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 08/13/2013 10:28 AM, Steve Gordon wrote:
> >>>> ...
> >>>>> I'd like to propose that we move to meeting fortnightly (every two
> >>>> weeks). Many other OpenStack projects meet weekly but I think
> switching
> >>>> gears straight from monthly to weekly would be too much, at least
> >>>> initially. I'd be interested in hearing the thoughts of others
> however.
> >>>> Please respond indicating whether you would prefer to:
> >>>>> a) Move to meeting weekly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> b) Move to meeting fortnightly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> c) Stay with meeting monthly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As above my initial vote is for (b)
> >>> As is mine.
> >>>
> >>> Or d) meet at 2 different times alternating weeks. Too complex? Yes. I
> have
> >>> a hard enough time getting to the early ones when the time changes as
> you
> >>> all know. :)
> >> I'm somewhat wary of this approach for similar reasons.
> >>
> >>>> +1 and perhaps the new meetings could be at an alternative time? The
> >>>> current time is difficult for me to make.
> >>>>
> >>> Hi David, the only overlap with Australia and China is either early
> morning
> >>> for us or early evening for us. So 7 or 8 am or 7, 8, or 9 pm are
> about it.
> >>> Given my evening schedule I'd prefer mornings.
> >> Indeed, finding suitable overlapping timeslots for these geos is
> troublesome, and we do have a growing number of contributors in APAC. It's
> good to periodically send out a whenisgood (or equivalent) survey to check
> what times suit the most contributors but my gut feeling is right now this
> timeslot is about as good as it's going to get.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openstack-docs mailing list
> >> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openstack-docs mailing list
> > Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-docs mailing list
> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>



-- 
Anne Gentle
annegentle at justwriteclick.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20130823/c47515e0/attachment.html>