[puppet] Summary of discussions at PTG Vancouver June 2023
Takashi Kajinami
tkajinam at redhat.com
Mon Jun 19 01:23:11 UTC 2023
Hello,
Thank you all for joining our PTG session !
It was really nice to meet some of the team members in person.
The etherpad for the discussion can be found in the link below, but
I'll share a summary of our discussions in this email. In case you have
any questions/concerns then feel free to let me know.
https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/vancouver-june2023-puppet-openstack
- Status update
- We share the status of each person.
- Unfortunately all of the members attending the discussion have
limited resources especially for development
- *Agreement:* we focus on priorities and de-prioritize items which
does not cause immediate problems/breackages
- *Agreement: *we ensure we finish the prioritized items in a
specific release to keep our maintenance simple
- Puppet 8 support
- We added unit/lint tests with Puppet 8 for early testing, but
adding integration tests is currently blocked
by some ruby dependencies not yet available for Ruby 3.1 which is
required by Puppet 8.
- All of the operating system versions do not provide Ruby 3.1 now
- Puppet 7 EOL is not yet declared
- *Agreement*: We leave this as non-priority for now and re-work on
it once Ruby 3.1 is globally available
- Adaptation to puppetlab-stdlib 9.0.0
- Some deprecated items were removed. We adapted our modules but are
still waiting for update
in the dependent modules
- validate_legacy was deprecated and causes large warning no*w*
- Functions from stdlib should be now namespace-d to avoid warnings
after bump is done
- *Agreement:* We prioritize replacing validate_legacy by typed
parameters
- *Agreement*: We pin stdlib to an older version for now but attempt
to bump it early
- Module modernizations
- Typed parameters
- Replacing validate_legacy needs to be prioritized now to adapt
to puppetlab-stdlib 9.0.0
- Implementing type validations for openstack config options
require further discussions.
Handling of os_service_defualt would be the main topic we have to
sort
- We prefer consistent implementations for all openstack service
modules, while we can attempt
some changes early in a few "independent" modules such as extras,
vswitch, qdr
- *Agreement: *We de-prioritize implementing validations for
config options
- *Agreement: *We ensure implementations is distributed to all
modules consistently in a single release
- Hieradata
- This is "modern" design pattern, and it's ideal to replace
legacy params class by it
- However we don't have urgent requirement to complete this work
- We have to create the common structure for hieradata files
maintained in each repositories
- Some concerns have been raised mainly how we can pick up some
values once this change is made
- *Agreement: *We de-prioritize this work for now
- *Agreement: *We can start with the flat files (pattern 1 in
https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/puppet-hieradata-structure )
- *Agreement: *tkajinam will submit a few examples and we review
how this impact the existing usage
- *Agreement: *Similarly to typed parameters, we should coordinate
this work to make the change consistently
- Making distro/version specific logic selectable by parameters
- This work is tightly related to the hieradata work
- *Agreement: *We basically leave this work until the above
hieradata work is completed, and de-prioritize this.
- Branch retirements
- We have multiple branches open now and aim to reduce number of
branches
- Red Hat is interested in keeping train open until 2023Q3
(tentative) and wallaby for some times for donwstream
- Others do not have requirement to maintain old releases in EM status
- *Agreement: *We aim to retire train/ussuri/branch after 2023Q3.
Retiring further branches is subject to future discussions
Thank you,
Takashi Kajinami
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230619/6dec2007/attachment.htm>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list