Open Stack

Le mer. 26 oct. 2022 à 21:08, melanie witt <melwittt at gmail.com> a écrit :

> On Wed Oct 26 2022 11:24:37 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time), Kendall
> Nelson <kennelson11 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > No that wasn't the plan. I think the Forum will also still happen as per
> > usual.
>
> TBH, I wouldn't mind it (and I think I would actually prefer it) if we
> went back to the OG model of having the summit and the design summit at
> the same time. I was never into the split off into the PTG but wanted to
> be open minded. I think having the user-oriented energy of the summit
> combined with the ability to participate on the dev side at the same
> event was a good thing. I might be alone in this feeling though.
>
> That said, I think gmann highlighted the challenge with this would be
> how we really need to have two events per year to collaborate on each
> upcoming release. I wonder if we could do one co-located event with the
> summit and then a virtual PTG for the other cycle? I dunno if the
> virtual PTG is too resource intensive. I'm generally not a fan of
> virtual events but I have quite liked the virtual PTG. I think it has
> been running really smoothly and very productive.
>
>
I agree with Melanie here. My personal view is that we could take the
opportunity to gather back operators and developers into one single event
that would happen once a year, ideally be the OIF Summit which would
incidentally be at the beginning of a release period (ideal time to
showcase the recent new features and to hear from feeeback before starting
to draft other features)
Virtual PTGs would still be necessary at every odd release since there were
no physical PTG but in this situation, we would rotate between physical and
virtual every 6 months, which should give us benefits of both.

Last note, as we started having tick-tock releases [1], this sounds fitting
perfectly our new release model : physical PTGs could happen at the
beginning of a tock release and virtual PTGs at the beginning of a tick.

HTH,
-Sylvain

[1]
https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20220210-release-cadence-adjustment.html


> Just my 2c.
>
> -melwitt
>
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 11:29 AM Sean Mooney <smooney at redhat.com
> > <mailto:smooney at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 11:13 -0500, Kendall Nelson wrote:
> >      > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 1:52 PM Ghanshyam Mann
> >     <gmann at ghanshyammann.com <mailto:gmann at ghanshyammann.com>>
> >      > wrote:
> >      >
> >      > >  ---- On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:32:46 -0700  Kendall Nelson  wrote
> ---
> >      > >  > Hello Everyone!
> >      > >  > Congratulations on a great virtual PTG last week :)
> >      > >  >
> >      > >  > The OpenInfra Foundation is hosting the OpenInfra Summit in
> >     Vancouver
> >      > > [1], June 13 -15, 2023.
> >      > >  > We are trying to determine the level of interest among
> >     contributors to
> >      > > OpenInfra projects on attending a co-located PTG in Vancouver.
> >     The exact
> >      > > format and dates are still being determined. At this time, we
> are
> >      > > evaluating the level of interest from an attendee and employer
> >     perspective.
> >      > > Please complete the following poll so we can measure the level
> >     of interest
> >      > > and plan accordingly. Future updates will be distributed to the
> >     project
> >      > > mailing lists as well as previous PTG attendees.
> >      > >  >
> >      > >
> >      > > Thanks, Kendall for collecting the feedback and survey. One
> >     question to
> >      > > understand the future PTGs schedule.
> >      > >
> >      > > As PTGs are aligned with the OpenStack new development cycle
> >     timing, they
> >      > > were very helpful to plan the
> >      > > new cycle features/work well at the start of the cycle.  But
> >     seeing the
> >      > > summit co-located PTG timing which
> >      > > is June, I am curious to know if there will be a PTG for the
> >     2023.2 (B)
> >      > > cycle in April (with 2023.1 Antelope releasing
> >      > > at the March end) also? Or we are going to have only one in
> >     June which
> >      > > will be co-located in Vancouver Summit (once
> >      > > it is final based on survey results).
> >      > >
> >      >
> >      > We would still do the usual virtual PTG on the ''normal"
> >     timeline. This
> >      > potential add on to Vancouver would be in addition to the virtual
> >     PTG.
> >     so replacing the fourm?
> >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > > Definitely, having a co-located PTGs in Summit is a very good
> >     idea, saving
> >      > > travel, and being much more productive also
> >      > > but it's just timing from OpenStack release perspective making
> >     it a little
> >      > > bit difficult.
> >      > >
> >      > > -gmann
> >      > >
> >      > >  > Poll:
> >      > >
> >     https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfra_ptg_2023
> >     <https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfra_ptg_2023>
> >      > >  >
> >      > >  > As a reminder, we are also gathering feedback for the
> >     virtual PTG here:
> >      > > https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Oct2022_PTGFeedback
> >     <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Oct2022_PTGFeedback>
> >      > >  >
> >      > >  > -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo)
> >      > >  > [1] https://openinfra.dev/summit/
> >     <https://openinfra.dev/summit/>
> >      > >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20221027/25cfeb5f/attachment.htm>