<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le mer. 26 oct. 2022 à 21:08, melanie witt <<a href="mailto:melwittt@gmail.com">melwittt@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Wed Oct 26 2022 11:24:37 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time), Kendall <br>
Nelson <<a href="mailto:kennelson11@gmail.com" target="_blank">kennelson11@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> No that wasn't the plan. I think the Forum will also still happen as per <br>
> usual.<br>
<br>
TBH, I wouldn't mind it (and I think I would actually prefer it) if we <br>
went back to the OG model of having the summit and the design summit at <br>
the same time. I was never into the split off into the PTG but wanted to <br>
be open minded. I think having the user-oriented energy of the summit <br>
combined with the ability to participate on the dev side at the same <br>
event was a good thing. I might be alone in this feeling though.<br>
<br>
That said, I think gmann highlighted the challenge with this would be <br>
how we really need to have two events per year to collaborate on each <br>
upcoming release. I wonder if we could do one co-located event with the <br>
summit and then a virtual PTG for the other cycle? I dunno if the <br>
virtual PTG is too resource intensive. I'm generally not a fan of <br>
virtual events but I have quite liked the virtual PTG. I think it has <br>
been running really smoothly and very productive.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I agree with Melanie here. My personal view is that we could take the opportunity to gather back operators and developers into one single event that would happen once a year, ideally be the OIF Summit which would incidentally be at the beginning of a release period (ideal time to showcase the recent new features and to hear from feeeback before starting to draft other features)</div><div>Virtual PTGs would still be necessary at every odd release since there were no physical PTG but in this situation, we would rotate between physical and virtual every 6 months, which should give us benefits of both.</div><div><br></div><div>Last note, as we started having tick-tock releases [1], this sounds fitting perfectly our new release model : physical PTGs could happen at the beginning of a tock release and virtual PTGs at the beginning of a tick.</div><div><br></div><div>HTH,<br></div><div>-Sylvain</div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20220210-release-cadence-adjustment.html">https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20220210-release-cadence-adjustment.html</a></div><div> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Just my 2c.<br>
<br>
-melwitt<br>
<br>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 11:29 AM Sean Mooney <<a href="mailto:smooney@redhat.com" target="_blank">smooney@redhat.com</a> <br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:smooney@redhat.com" target="_blank">smooney@redhat.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 11:13 -0500, Kendall Nelson wrote:<br>
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 1:52 PM Ghanshyam Mann<br>
> <<a href="mailto:gmann@ghanshyammann.com" target="_blank">gmann@ghanshyammann.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gmann@ghanshyammann.com" target="_blank">gmann@ghanshyammann.com</a>>><br>
> > wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > > ---- On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:32:46 -0700 Kendall Nelson wrote ---<br>
> > > > Hello Everyone!<br>
> > > > Congratulations on a great virtual PTG last week :)<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > The OpenInfra Foundation is hosting the OpenInfra Summit in<br>
> Vancouver<br>
> > > [1], June 13 -15, 2023.<br>
> > > > We are trying to determine the level of interest among<br>
> contributors to<br>
> > > OpenInfra projects on attending a co-located PTG in Vancouver.<br>
> The exact<br>
> > > format and dates are still being determined. At this time, we are<br>
> > > evaluating the level of interest from an attendee and employer<br>
> perspective.<br>
> > > Please complete the following poll so we can measure the level<br>
> of interest<br>
> > > and plan accordingly. Future updates will be distributed to the<br>
> project<br>
> > > mailing lists as well as previous PTG attendees.<br>
> > > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > > Thanks, Kendall for collecting the feedback and survey. One<br>
> question to<br>
> > > understand the future PTGs schedule.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > As PTGs are aligned with the OpenStack new development cycle<br>
> timing, they<br>
> > > were very helpful to plan the<br>
> > > new cycle features/work well at the start of the cycle. But<br>
> seeing the<br>
> > > summit co-located PTG timing which<br>
> > > is June, I am curious to know if there will be a PTG for the<br>
> 2023.2 (B)<br>
> > > cycle in April (with 2023.1 Antelope releasing<br>
> > > at the March end) also? Or we are going to have only one in<br>
> June which<br>
> > > will be co-located in Vancouver Summit (once<br>
> > > it is final based on survey results).<br>
> > ><br>
> ><br>
> > We would still do the usual virtual PTG on the ''normal"<br>
> timeline. This<br>
> > potential add on to Vancouver would be in addition to the virtual<br>
> PTG.<br>
> so replacing the fourm?<br>
> <br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > > Definitely, having a co-located PTGs in Summit is a very good<br>
> idea, saving<br>
> > > travel, and being much more productive also<br>
> > > but it's just timing from OpenStack release perspective making<br>
> it a little<br>
> > > bit difficult.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > -gmann<br>
> > ><br>
> > > > Poll:<br>
> > ><br>
> <a href="https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfra_ptg_2023" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfra_ptg_2023</a><br>
> <<a href="https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfra_ptg_2023" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfra_ptg_2023</a>><br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > As a reminder, we are also gathering feedback for the<br>
> virtual PTG here:<br>
> > > <a href="https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Oct2022_PTGFeedback" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Oct2022_PTGFeedback</a><br>
> <<a href="https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Oct2022_PTGFeedback" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Oct2022_PTGFeedback</a>><br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo)<br>
> > > > [1] <a href="https://openinfra.dev/summit/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://openinfra.dev/summit/</a><br>
> <<a href="https://openinfra.dev/summit/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://openinfra.dev/summit/</a>><br>
> > ><br>
> <br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div>