Open Stack

Hi Jay,

We had a discussion a few months ago about closing pre-train branches
https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-June/029274.html

Train Ussuri and Victoria we should probably raise this in the upstream
meeting (to see what people will also think about it, in case we don't have
responses here)

Thanks!

Em ter., 4 de out. de 2022 às 15:20, Jay Faulkner <jay at gr-oss.io> escreveu:

> Hi all,
>
> Ironic has a large amount of stable branches still in EM. We need to take
> action to ensure those branches are either retired or have CI repaired to
> the point of being usable.
>
> Specifically, I'm looking at these branches across all Ironic projects:
> - stable/queens
> - stable/rocky
> - stable/stein
> - stable/train
> - stable/ussuri
> - stable/victoria
>
> In lieu of any volunteers to maintain the CI, my recommendation for all
> the branches listed above is that they be marked EOL. If someone wants to
> volunteer to maintain CI for those branches, they can propose one of the
> below paths be taken instead:
>
> 1 - Someone volunteers to maintain these branches, and also report the
> status of CI of these older branches periodically on the Ironic whiteboard
> and in Ironic meetings. If you feel strongly that one of these branches
> needs to continue to be in service; volunteering in this way is how to save
> them.
>
> 2 - We seriously reduce CI. Basically removing all tempest tests to ensure
> that CI remains reliable and able to merge emergency or security fixes when
> needed. In some cases; this still requires CI fixes as some older inspector
> branches are failing *installing packages* in unit tests. I would still
> like, in this case, that someone volunteers to ensure the minimalist CI
> remains happy.
>
> My intention is to let this message serve as notice and a waiting period;
> and if I've not heard any response here or in Monday's Ironic meeting (in 6
> days), I will begin taking action on retiring these branches.
>
> This is simply a start; other branches (including bugfix branches) are
> also in bad shape in CI, but getting these retired will significantly
> reduce the surface area of projects and branches to evaluate.
>
> I know it's painful to drop support for these branches; but we've provided
> good EM support for these branches for a long time and by pruning them
> away, we'll be able to save time to dedicate to other items.
>
> Thanks,
> Jay Faulkner
>


-- 
*Att[]'s*

*Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira *
*MSc in Computer Science at UFCG*
*Ironic PTL *
*Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat Brazil*
*Social*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/iurygregory
*E-mail:  iurygregory at gmail.com <iurygregory at gmail.com>*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20221004/83e323a8/attachment-0001.htm>