Open Stack

Thanks Jeremy, will try to analyze the trace.

This is not too extensive, but better then silent pin without possibility
to even notice that.

I see that there are generally not enough deep tests for Openstack driver
in Zuul since mostly issues appear in Prod.  I will to try to invest some
time there.

Artem

----
typed from mobile, auto-correct typos assumed
----

On Thu, Jun 2, 2022, 21:47 Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:

> On 2022-06-02 21:12:33 +0200 (+0200), Artem Goncharov wrote:
> [...]
> > I listen to complains carefully, and that is the reason for R1.0
> > not to exist as of now.
> [...]
>
> It's probably also worth pointing out, from a user experience
> perspective, that we anticipated backward-incompatible changes in
> 1.0.0 and so merged an openstacksdk<1 pin in nodepool's
> requirements.txt file. Unfortunately, instead the
> backward-incompatible changes were released as 0.99.0 so when the
> container images for our launchers updated we started getting
> another error back from all of the Rackspace regions we're using
> (traceback attached).
>
> I'm happy to file a bug report on that if nobody has beaten me to
> it, but further diagnostics will probably have to wait until after
> summit travel since we've rolled back to 0.61.0 for now.
> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20220602/709e32bb/attachment.htm>