Open Stack

Hi,
Could this problem affect cinder-tempest-plugin-lvm-tgt-barbican jobs as
well? (All the nova+lvm test are failing)
https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/140630488ea745a69ce3ebadf85a41fa

Thanks
Sofia

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 3:22 PM Sylvain Bauza <sbauza at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> Le mar. 29 nov. 2022 à 09:33, Sylvain Bauza <sbauza at redhat.com> a écrit :
>
>> (early morning, needing a coffee apparently)
>>
>> Le mar. 29 nov. 2022 à 09:32, Sylvain Bauza <sbauza at redhat.com> a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le lun. 28 nov. 2022 à 14:28, Sylvain Bauza <sbauza at redhat.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>> Sorry folks, that's kind of an email I hate writing but let's be honest
>>>> : our gate is busted.
>>>> Until we figure out a correct path for resolution, I hereby ask you to
>>>> *NOT* recheck in order to not spill our precious CI resources for tests
>>>> that are certain to fail.
>>>>
>>>> Long story story, there are currently two problems :
>>>> #1 https://launchpad.net/bugs/1940425 nova-ovs-hybrid-plug and
>>>> nova-next jobs 100% fail due to a port remaining in down state.
>>>> #2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1960346 nova-lvm job 100%
>>>> fails due to a volume detach failure probably due to QEMU
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Today's update :
>>>
>>>
>>>> #1 is currently investigated by the Neutron team meanwhile a patch [1]
>>>> has been proposed against Zuul to skip the failing tests.
>>>> Unfortunately, this patch [1] is unable to merge due to #2.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Good news, kudos to the Neutron team which delivered a bugfix against
>>> the rootcause, which is always better than just skipping tests (and lacking
>>> then coverage).
>>> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/837780/18
>>>
>>> Accordingly, [1] is no longer necessary and has been abandoned after a
>>> recheck to verify the job runs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> #2 has a Tempest patch that's being worked on [2] but the current state
>>>> of this patch is WIP.
>>>> We somehow need to have an agreement on the way forward during this
>>>> afternoon (UTC) to identify whether we can reasonably progress on [2] or
>>>> skip the failing tests on nova-lvm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Given [2] is hard to write, gmann proposed a patch [3] for skipping some
>>> nova-lvm tests. Reviews of [3] ongoing, should be hopefully merged today
>>> around noon UTC.
>>>
>>> Once [3] is merged, the gate should be unblocked.
>>> Again, an email will be sent once we progress on [3].
>>>
>>
> [3] is merged, so now the gate is back \o/
> Thanks all folks who helped on those issues !
>
>
>> -S
>>>
>>>
>>>> Again, sorry about the bad news and I'll keep you informed.
>>>> -Sylvain
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865658/
>>>> [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/842240
>>>>
>>> [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865922
>>
>

-- 

Sofía Enriquez

she/her

Software Engineer

Red Hat PnT <https://www.redhat.com>

IRC: @enriquetaso
@RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat>   Red Hat
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat>  Red Hat
<https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>
<https://www.redhat.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20221202/c9915660/attachment.htm>