Hey Lajos, On 21/03/2022 11:12, Lajos Katona wrote: > Hi Christian, > Thanks for your efforts for reproduction. > I will bring this topic to the team meeting tomorrow > (https://meetings.opendev.org/#Neutron_Team_Meeting ): > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings#On_Demand_Agenda > > Regarding your frustration, I totally understand it. It is, I think > can be a topic for the coming PTG. 1) First thanks again for raising issue of a lack of maintainers for VPNaaS at https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/networking/2022/networking.2022-03-22-14.06.log.html#l-62 <https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/networking/2022/networking.2022-03-22-14.06.log.html#l-62>. Were there any more take-aways from your PTG discussion if I may ask? Is there any chance anybody might look at our reported and DevStack-reproduced issue about the duplicate IPtable rules (https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1943449) ? Do you need more info of any kind? 2) If there is a way forward for keeping VPNaaS ... * Will OVN receive support at some point? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/765353 <https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/765353> 3) More protocols? Are there any plans on extending on the types as currently only IPSEC is supported (https://opendev.org/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/src/branch/master/neutron_vpnaas/services/vpn/device_drivers). I was thinking about Wireguard which is also built into the linux kernel and saw amazing pick-up in recent times. Even consumer devices use it now as it's MUCH simpler than IPSEC. Regards Christian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20220411/cdab7309/attachment-0001.htm>