[neutron] Bug Deputy Report January 03 - 10
katonalala at gmail.com
Mon Apr 11 14:38:32 UTC 2022
We touched this topic during the PTG, but it seems that there was nobody
from the participants who would like to maintain neutron-vpnaas, so I sent
out a mail asking for help:
Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)
Christian Rohmann <christian.rohmann at inovex.de> ezt írta (időpont: 2022.
ápr. 11., H, 11:00):
> Hey Lajos,
> On 21/03/2022 11:12, Lajos Katona wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> Thanks for your efforts for reproduction.
> I will bring this topic to the team meeting tomorrow (
> https://meetings.opendev.org/#Neutron_Team_Meeting ):
> Regarding your frustration, I totally understand it. It is, I think can be
> a topic for the coming PTG.
> 1) First thanks again for raising issue of a lack of maintainers for
> VPNaaS at
> Were there any more take-aways from your PTG discussion if I may ask?
> Is there any chance anybody might look at our reported and
> DevStack-reproduced issue about the duplicate IPtable rules (
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1943449) ?
> Do you need more info of any kind?
> 2) If there is a way forward for keeping VPNaaS ...
> * Will OVN receive support at some point?
> 3) More protocols?
> Are there any plans on extending on the types as currently only IPSEC is
> supported (
> I was thinking about Wireguard which is also built into the linux kernel
> and saw amazing pick-up in recent times. Even consumer devices use it now
> as it's MUCH simpler than IPSEC.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openstack-discuss